Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for YuKongA | Channel

Channel

YuKongA | Channel

@YuKongA13579

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,207subscribers

+1,662 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001376694766
TypeChannel
Username@YuKongA13579
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/YuKongA13579

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,5458,2077,3766 August 2026 — 6,545 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,562 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,667 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,788 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,939 subscribers18 August 2026 — 7,022 subscribers21 August 2026 — 7,108 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,234 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,370 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,466 subscribers4 September 2026 — 7,563 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,731 subscribers13 September 2026 — 7,978 subscribers17 September 2026 — 8,207 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net +1,662. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,296–8,456 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 12:598,207+229
13 Sept 2026, 11:557,978+247
9 Sept 2026, 09:217,731+168
4 Sept 2026, 06:197,563+97
31 Aug 2026, 11:357,466+96
28 Aug 2026, 03:587,370+136
25 Aug 2026, 02:247,234+126
21 Aug 2026, 14:577,108+86
18 Aug 2026, 20:437,022+83
16 Aug 2026, 07:046,939+151
12 Aug 2026, 13:256,788+121
9 Aug 2026, 22:316,667+105
6 Aug 2026, 22:356,562+17
6 Aug 2026, 07:316,545first reading

Engagement

44 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 44 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
18s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,839 reactions across 38 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
55330.1%
🤣31317.0%
🥰21511.7%
👍21011.4%
🔥1377.45%
😱633.43%
🤯472.56%
😁432.34%
🤔361.96%
💩321.74%
🤩311.69%
🌭281.52%
😡241.31%
👏231.25%
👾170.924%
👌130.707%
🫡90.489%
🤮80.435%
🌚50.272%
🐳50.272%
12 further kinds271.47%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,937 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
22
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 44 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
8
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @YuKongA13579. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 44 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 25 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

25 Aug 2026, 06:26 UTC≈2,610 views49 reactionsread 28 August 2026

目前打算完全重写 TWRP 的 UI,征集一下设计,有想法的可以提供设计图, AI 画的也可,但要求是不要过分花哨,不要复古风格。 另开了一个专门的群:https://t.me/+cjOFmIIiqFBmZjY1

41👍8

24 Aug 2026, 13:18 UTC≈3,560 views51 reactionsread 28 August 2026
File

🤨 小米 17 系列 TWRP-16 3.7.1 B3 🤨 更新日志: - 添加 Wi-Fi 支持 - 大量依赖现代化 注意: 由于引入 Wi-Fi 支持需要多干很多事情,首屏速度变慢了 支持设备: Xiaomi 17 Xiaomi 17 Pro Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Xiaomi 17 Ultra 主要测试设备: Xiaomi 17 Pro Max,我自己只有该设备,仅在该设备测试 可选捐赠: 爱发电 GitHub: https://github.com/YuKongA/twrp_device_xiaomi_sm8850 #TWRP

37🤩8👍5💋1

22 Aug 2026, 05:02 UTC≈4,030 views71 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

左边 View 应用,右边 Flutter 应用。 这次不说 Flutter 技术栈,来看看小米给 Flutter 应用用的基础图标。 先看左边 View 版本的,中规中矩吧。 ArrowRight 和 UpdownArrow 粗细合适,宽度合适,视觉平衡。 那右边 Flutter 版本的呢,错落有致吧。 1、UpdownArrow 明显比 ArrowRight 粗 2、ArrowRight 明显比 UpdownArrow 宽 3、UpdownArrow 比 ArrowRight 更靠内 这就是小米对打算转型 Flutter 应用的基本预期吗? 是原来的这套图标版权到期了 Flutter 里不能用吗? #hyperos #misc

🤣638

17 Aug 2026, 09:55 UTC≈5,830 views49 reactionsread 28 August 2026
File

Mishka 1.0.0 Pre-release 7 - 更新内核 v1.19.30 - 支持渐进顶栏 - 支持侧滑返回 - 更新其他依赖 #mishka

🥰406👍3

15 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTC≈11,000 views115 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

笔记的右上角弹出菜单,浅色模式是 miuix 图标,深色模式是 material 图标。AI 能写出这种代码么😳 #xiaomi #misc

🤣91🤔14😁64

15 Aug 2026, 04:13 UTC≈5,800 views18 reactionsread 28 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

👏162

15 Aug 2026, 03:55 UTC≈6,040 views31 reactionsread 28 August 2026

REDMI K90 Pro Max 和 Xiaomi 17、Xiaomi 17 Ultra 的 6.12.69 仍然可以 GhostLock-App 一键越狱,在可利用范围。其他几个机型不能用这条利用链了,CVE-2026-43499 的问题还在,需要用其他利用链,但基本上是不能免 ADB 了。 也可以尝试新的 CVE-2026-64560,但是这个堆风水的成功率应该更低😂 #xiaomi #ghostlock #misc

27👏4

15 Aug 2026, 02:36 UTC≈5,030 views51 reactionsread 28 August 2026

别找我问 OS4 的 TWRP 了,我不吃屎的 至于昨天发的那两个动态,都是群友的图 #twrp #xiaomi #misc

👍36🤣102🥰2🔥1

14 Aug 2026, 07:29 UTC≈5,120 views76 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

你这中间是否有点太敷衍了😳 #misc

🤣71👏32

14 Aug 2026, 07:21 UTC≈4,940 views50 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

我了个豆,OS4 这效果好像还不如隔壁任何一家,偏偏它性能要求最高 #misc

🤣41💩53😁1

13 Aug 2026, 12:27 UTC≈4,820 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Poll

你觉得安卓和苹果的正统设计中谁最好看

  1. iOS 26+ Liquid Glass26%
  2. iOS 7-18 Flat Design18%
  3. Android 5.0-8.1 Material Design 15%
  4. Android 9-11 Material Design 210%
  5. Android 12.0-16.0 Material Design 318%
  6. Android 16.1+ Material 3 Expressive23%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2

13 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC≈4,930 views43 reactionsread 28 August 2026

https://x.com/GoogleDesign/status/2087195277094695096 这辈子没见过这么富有表现力的丑设计,感谢我们伟大的 Google Inc. #m3e #misc

💩27😁12😭2🤨1🤯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @YuKongA13579. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@YuKongA13579 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Aug 2026, 12:27 UTCAnonymous Poll989 voters

你觉得安卓和苹果的正统设计中谁最好看

  1. iOS 26+ Liquid Glass26%
  2. iOS 7-18 Flat Design18%
  3. Android 5.0-8.1 Material Design 15%
  4. Android 9-11 Material Design 210%
  5. Android 12.0-16.0 Material Design 318%
  6. Android 16.1+ Material 3 Expressive23%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 25 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

SCENE Downloads
@scene2023 · 54,890
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 12 September 2026
HyperCeiler | Release & Notice
@cemiuiler_release · 26,729
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 12 September 2026
5ec1cff
@real5ec1cff · 36,882
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 2 September 2026
FunProject
@QToolCI · 49,454
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 12 September 2026
不靠谱的喵(>^ω^<) #CatGPT
@MlgmXyysd_bibilailai · 21,600
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 23 September 2026
LuckyTool
@LuckyTool · 28,293
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 12 September 2026
Nagram Tips
@NagramTips · 46,239
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 30 August 2026
LSPosedArchives
@LSPosedArchives · 25,293
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 14 September 2026
MiTechTalks
@MiTechTalks · 46,593
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 28 August 2026
Tech Mukul | Xiaomi HyperOS 4 🧑‍💻🧑‍💻
@TECH_MUKUL · 31,313
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 6 September 2026
Xiaomi Fans Home
@Mi_Global_Community · 28,891
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 9 September 2026
HyperOS & MIUI Updates Tracker
@MIUIUpdatesTracker · 50,173
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“YuKongA | Channel” (@YuKongA13579), 8,207 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/YuKongA13579.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.