Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for LuckyTool

Channel

LuckyTool

@LuckyTool

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

28,293subscribers

+1,487 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001754519712
TypeChannel
Username@LuckyTool
Description禁止引流、搬运、转载、售卖、分享、分流 频道已关联讨论群,点击关联群组即可跳转 加入讨论群后才可以在频道信息中进行评论
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/LuckyTool

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

26,80628,29327,549.57 August 2026 — 26,806 subscribers7 August 2026 — 26,826 subscribers8 August 2026 — 26,859 subscribers9 August 2026 — 26,887 subscribers10 August 2026 — 26,939 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26,991 subscribers12 August 2026 — 27,026 subscribers14 August 2026 — 27,052 subscribers15 August 2026 — 27,086 subscribers16 August 2026 — 27,129 subscribers17 August 2026 — 27,154 subscribers18 August 2026 — 27,217 subscribers19 August 2026 — 27,269 subscribers20 August 2026 — 27,311 subscribers22 August 2026 — 27,355 subscribers23 August 2026 — 27,389 subscribers25 August 2026 — 27,455 subscribers25 August 2026 — 27,472 subscribers26 August 2026 — 27,509 subscribers27 August 2026 — 27,532 subscribers28 August 2026 — 27,552 subscribers29 August 2026 — 27,570 subscribers30 August 2026 — 27,633 subscribers31 August 2026 — 27,682 subscribers1 September 2026 — 27,720 subscribers2 September 2026 — 27,764 subscribers4 September 2026 — 27,810 subscribers6 September 2026 — 27,912 subscribers9 September 2026 — 28,030 subscribers12 September 2026 — 28,104 subscribers13 September 2026 — 28,186 subscribers15 September 2026 — 28,227 subscribers17 September 2026 — 28,293 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 41 days, net +1,487. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,583–28,516 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 12:5828,293+66
15 Sept 2026, 13:4128,227+41
13 Sept 2026, 22:1728,186+82
12 Sept 2026, 02:5628,104+74
9 Sept 2026, 18:3928,030+118
6 Sept 2026, 13:5727,912+102
4 Sept 2026, 06:5727,810+46
2 Sept 2026, 22:3527,764+44
1 Sept 2026, 19:2527,720+38
31 Aug 2026, 20:3627,682+49
30 Aug 2026, 20:3427,633+63
29 Aug 2026, 23:3327,570+18
28 Aug 2026, 19:5327,552+20
27 Aug 2026, 20:2627,532+23
26 Aug 2026, 20:4727,509+37
25 Aug 2026, 23:0127,472+17
25 Aug 2026, 01:5527,455+66
23 Aug 2026, 16:4827,389+34
22 Aug 2026, 01:5827,355+44
20 Aug 2026, 18:4627,311first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 26 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.2%
avg views ÷ 28,293 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,440
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 September 2026
Posts held31 (26 January 202619 September 2026)
Views total54,400
Reactions total545
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken19 Sept 2026, 07:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
112
Videos
2
Links
71

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 16s
Average length
1m 08s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,321 reactions across 30 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,17327.1%
😱97222.5%
👍82019.0%
😭57613.3%
😡2124.91%
🥰1413.26%
😁952.20%
🤣591.37%
👏581.34%
🫡420.972%
🤔290.671%
🔥280.648%
👻180.417%
💔150.347%
🕊140.324%
😢100.231%
😨100.231%
90.208%
🌚80.185%
👀60.139%
10 further kinds260.602%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,321 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 26 January 2026 to 19 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
94
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 30 we hold a reading for · 23%
Most on one post
34
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @LuckyTool. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 31 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 January 2026 to 19 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

18 Sept 2026, 05:51 UTC≈4,270 views38 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍2594

17 Sept 2026, 03:20 UTC≈5,360 views42 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍375

17 Sept 2026, 03:20 UTC≈5,100 views9 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍72

2 Sept 2026, 11:23 UTC≈6,440 views101 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

17 号见!

75🕊14👍10👏1🤔1

1 Sept 2026, 22:48 UTCviews —

LuckyTool pinned «https://github.com/luckyzyx/LuckyTool LuckyTool目前已重新开源并且使用GPL 3.0许可证»

30 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC≈11,500 views182 reactions1 Starread 4 September 2026

更新此版本后出现的legacy提示可以忽略,在v2.3.0之前不影响功能使用,后期正在准备适配迁移libxpsoed 102,敬请期待!

👍15214🥰8👻5👏2🔥1

30 Aug 2026, 08:30 UTC≈7,220 views19 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Forwarded from @LSPosed

v2.2.0 重要 - New XSharedPreferences 计划于 2.3.0 正式移除,模块页面已为有兼容风险的模块加入废弃警告。判断逻辑为 legacy 模块声明支持 nsp 并存在 others 可读 xml。升级到 libxposed 或将 xposedminversion 设置为 82 并删除 xposedsharedprefs 以移除警告。 新增 - 支持注入 HyperOS Runtime 应用(需要兼容 Zygisk Next API 的 Zygisk 实现) - 在 A17 及以上以注入方式处理 dex2oat 包装器,避免挂载泄漏(需要兼容 Zygisk Next API 的 Zygisk 实现) 改进 - 提升多进程应用中模块服务连接的稳定性 - 优化管理器中的兼容性状态展示与异常提示 修复 - 修复资源 Hook XML 重写长期失效的问题 - 修复模块热重载失败后可能产生状态异常的问题

👍134👻2

1 Aug 2026, 12:07 UTC≈29,600 views395 reactions34 Starsread 4 September 2026

https://github.com/luckyzyx/LuckyTool LuckyTool目前已重新开源并且使用GPL 3.0许可证

292👍64😱13🔥11🥰10👏3🤣2

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @LuckyTool. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

5ec1cff
@real5ec1cff · 36,523
#1
AdClose Official
@AdClose · 12,173
#2
橘橘橘子汁 & 🍊
@microblock_pub · 15,261
#3
QAuxiliary CI Builds
@QAuxiliary_CI · 19,506
#4
akashaProxy ci channel
@akashaProxy · 1,740
#5
InstallerX
@InstallerX · 8,678
#6
TSBattery CI Builds
@TSBattery_CI · 3,599
#7
FlClash Channel
@FlClash · 46,371
#8
HyperCeiler | Canary Test
@cemiuiler_canary · 18,690
#9
Zzz Backup
@Genshin_Backup · 341
#10
Freedom+
@FreedomPlugin · 9,007
#11
盐酸乙酰胆碱
@teb1e · 525
#12
爱玩机工具箱(文件/通知)
@aiwanji · 8,491
#13
OPlus Official ROMs
@oplus_official_roms · 4,627
#14
LSPosed
@LSPosed · 193,348
#15
Real Nullptr
@nullptr_dev · 19,799
#16
ColorOS Pro
@colorospro · 2,675
#17
RandomFree
@c001apk · 6,704
#18
XiReiki
@xiayinlily · 2,863
#19
康娜酱酱酱
@K0bayashi_Kanna · 3,271 (as read 12 September 2026)
#20
NPatch
@NPatch · 19,080
#21
风向旗参考快讯
@xhqcankao · 163,238
#22
在花🎗️科技圈
@zaihuapd · 282,472
#23
LibChecker CI
@libchecker_ci · 3,485
#24
YuKongA | Channel
@YuKongA13579 · 8,207
#25
企业级欢乐花园
@MaterialDesign3 · 9,178
#26
QQ Updates
@QQUpdates · 10,190
#27
QQ/TIM Update Log
@qq_updatelog · 6,756
#28
Thanox Release
@thanoxrel · 3,080
#29
蓝点网订阅频道
@landiansub · 44,729
#30
Yummy 😋
@GodlyNews1 · 68,855
#31
LetITFly News
@LetITFlyW · 9,586
#32
𝐄𝟓 𝟖𝟔 𝟗𝟓
@e58695 · 3,449
#33
OnePlus Resources
@OnePlusRes · 1,713
#34
FunProject
@QToolCI · 49,469
#35
LoopDNS资讯播报
@DNSPODT · 71,856
#36
Voyager HyperOS Update
@VoyagerMIUIUpdate · 21,457
#37
AWAvenue Ads Rule
@AWAvenueAdsRule · 3,891
#38
Sakion Team
@Sakion_Team · 1,958
#39
SCENE Downloads
@scene2023 · 54,890
#40
亚托莉世界第一可爱
@atri0828 · 2,547
#41
Kimmy's 公开备忘录
@KimmyXYC_Soliloquize · 1,535
#42
VPS信号旗播报
@vps_xhq · 49,725
#43
PUI The Newsroom 😍
@PUINewsroom · 13,835
#44
Oxygen Customizer
@OxygenCustomizer · 1,941
#45
Pixel Props
@PixelProps · 14,197
#46
ColorOS System Apps
@oneoxygenos · 13,005
#47
ColorOS System Apps Updates
@Coloros17App · 14,556
#48
GApps Leaks
@GappsLeaks · 21,382
#49
DrDisagree's Projects
@DrDsProjects · 9,325
#50
Nagram
@nagram_channel · 67,794
#51
Mishaal's Android News Feed
@MishaalAndroidNews · 11,819
#52
ATT • Tech News
@agamtechtricks · 6,210
#53
Yamby Release
@yamby_release · 36,793
#54
Reveny
@reveny1 · 7,454
#55
OnePlus 11R/ACE 2 updates
@Oneplus11R_News · 824
#56

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

SCENE Downloads
@scene2023 · 54,890
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 12 September 2026
FunProject
@QToolCI · 49,469
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 12 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“LuckyTool” (@LuckyTool), 28,293 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LuckyTool.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.