Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ZEF GIRLS

Channel

ZEF GIRLS

@ZEF_GIRLS

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

10,812subscribers

+2,112 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001663570332
TypeChannel
Username@ZEF_GIRLS
Description21+ Канал не занимается продажей товаров и носит исключительно информационный характер!
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ZEF_GIRLS

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,23310,8129,522.56 August 2026 — 8,700 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,698 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,686 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,658 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,628 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,602 subscribers23 August 2026 — 8,575 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,553 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,531 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,519 subscribers6 September 2026 — 8,491 subscribers11 September 2026 — 8,444 subscribers14 September 2026 — 8,429 subscribers18 September 2026 — 8,416 subscribers28 September 2026 — 8,380 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,357 subscribers11 October 2026 — 8,339 subscribers15 October 2026 — 8,327 subscribers18 October 2026 — 8,309 subscribers21 October 2026 — 8,292 subscribers24 October 2026 — 8,269 subscribers26 October 2026 — 8,253 subscribers30 October 2026 — 8,233 subscribers2 November 2026 — 8,584 subscribers4 November 2026 — 10,067 subscribers6 November 2026 — 10,812 subscribers6 August 20266 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 91 days, net +2,112. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,846–11,199 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 02:5710,812+745
4 Nov 2026, 23:3710,067+1,483
2 Nov 2026, 04:098,584+351
30 Oct 2026, 00:068,233-20
26 Oct 2026, 23:258,253-16
24 Oct 2026, 04:488,269-23
21 Oct 2026, 13:218,292-17
18 Oct 2026, 01:188,309-18
15 Oct 2026, 05:408,327-12
11 Oct 2026, 22:558,339-18
5 Oct 2026, 18:598,357-23
28 Sept 2026, 11:018,380-36
18 Sept 2026, 22:368,416-13
14 Sept 2026, 20:418,429-15
11 Sept 2026, 01:388,444-47
6 Sept 2026, 04:578,491-28
2 Sept 2026, 05:438,519-12
30 Aug 2026, 09:358,531-22
27 Aug 2026, 08:378,553-22
23 Aug 2026, 23:378,575first reading

Engagement

45 posts held, back to 27 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.9%
avg views ÷ 10,812 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,180
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.88%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 45 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held45 (27 November 2025 – 6 November 2026)
Views total28,291
Reactions total815
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 22:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
19
Videos
74
Links
8

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
5m 18s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 32 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,253 reactions across 43 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥33226.5%
❤16112.8%
👍15812.6%
custom 545876995851735222614011.2%
custom 525586179635022406313210.5%
💅997.90%
🍌917.26%
🥰806.38%
🦄604.79%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,253 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 27 November 2025 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
67
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 45 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ZEF_GIRLS. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 45 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 November 2025 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 24 posts held from the last 30 days (8.33%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 07:56 UTC318 views26 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

И это я только разминаюсь 💃

❤‍🔥12🍌6🦄6❤2

5 Nov 2026, 07:01 UTC404 views26 reactions2 Starsread 6 November 2026
Video

Я давно определилась со своим выбором 🤩😍 А вы какую электронку выберете? BAD ACID или The Anime? 🫦

❤13custom 52558617963502240637custom 54587699585173522266

4 Nov 2026, 13:56 UTC533 views20 reactionsread 6 November 2026

3️⃣3️⃣3️⃣ - используй этот код, чтобы увеличить шансы на победу в розыгрыше 🩷 Следи за постами и историями, что бы не пропустить остальные 🔥

❤‍🔥9👍7🥰4

4 Nov 2026, 08:41 UTC561 views27 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Баланс, детка🩷🤸🏽‍♀️ Случай, когда действительно всё под контролем)

🦄14custom 52558617963502240637custom 54587699585173522265❤‍🔥1

3 Nov 2026, 07:28 UTC645 views29 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Чай, кофе, Рик и Морти? ☕️ Пусть с такой погодой за окном единственное, что будет холодным, - это Rick and Morty на замерзоне 🌃

💅14❤‍🔥8custom 54587699585173522267

2 Nov 2026, 08:33 UTC802 views38 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Лучший костюм на Хэллоуин 🎃

❤‍🔥16👍13🦄9

31 Oct 2026, 21:00 UTC≈1,050 views59 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026
Video

Охота на нечисть начинается 🫦 Любимый вкус 🔤🔣🔤 уже заряжен

👍27❤‍🔥17🍌9custom 54587699585173522264custom 52558617963502240632

31 Oct 2026, 13:57 UTC≈10,600 views129 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Розыгрыш iPhone 18 Pro Max 📱 Тот самый бургундовый красавец с картинки может стать твоим 🌚 Для участия: 🖤 Подпишись на ZEF GIRLS. 👍 Нажми кнопку Участвую. Итоги подведём 20 ноября. В боте будут дополнительные задания: выполняй их, чтобы заметно увеличить свои шансы на победу. Комментарии засчитываются от 25 символов! 💬

❤‍🔥72custom 545876995851735222626🍌19❤8👍3🦄1

31 Oct 2026, 06:58 UTC891 views48 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Сладость или гадость? 🩸 В эту ночь бойся не приведений, а остаться без любимой 🩸🩸🩸

👍24❤‍🔥14🥰10

30 Oct 2026, 09:10 UTC807 views30 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Под спортивным костюм один сюрприз, а в руке другой 🤫

❤‍🔥16🍌7custom 52558617963502240635❤1🥰1

29 Oct 2026, 07:02 UTC711 views22 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

И как вы поняли речь вообще не об икре…😏🫥 А об электронке Rick&Morty BAD ACID, такой яркой, дерзкой, обжигающе-кислой, насыщенной, сжимающей все внутри🤲

🍌12❤‍🔥5custom 52558617963502240635

28 Oct 2026, 06:59 UTC656 views25 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Oops…😅 Я снова забылась Ведь единственное, что не выходит у меня из головы это любимый R&M😐💋

custom 545876995851735222611💅7custom 52558617963502240637

Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @ZEF_GIRLS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Nov 2025, 11:02 UTCAnonymous Poll173 voters

А что выберешь ты? 😋

  1. Мармелад 🍡29%
  2. Клубника киви 🍓🥝33%
  3. Ягоды лимон 🫐🍒🍋38%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 27 November 2025 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ZEF GIRLS” (@ZEF_GIRLS), 10,812 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZEF_GIRLS.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.