Posted without readable text
👍9custom 53504944944101787525custom 53507798047926828424

Channel
@tasty_lab
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
13,361subscribers
+2,568 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002181128067 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tasty_lab |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tasty_lab |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 15:20 | 13,361 | +2,177 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 20:56 | 11,184 | +76 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 05:57 | 11,108 | +28 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:58 | 11,080 | +68 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:24 | 11,012 | +55 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:38 | 10,957 | +30 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:13 | 10,927 | +33 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:44 | 10,894 | +216 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:26 | 10,678 | +33 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:43 | 10,645 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 10,646 | -12 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 10,658 | -17 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 10,675 | -15 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:52 | 10,690 | -10 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:53 | 10,700 | -11 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:26 | 10,711 | -1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 10,712 | -15 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:07 | 10,727 | -14 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:18 | 10,741 | -5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:26 | 10,746 | first reading |
32 posts held, back to 20 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 32 (20 November 2025 – 1 September 2026) |
| Views total | 12,592 |
| Reactions total | 270 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 02:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,215 reactions across 32 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5350779804792682842 | 272 | 22.4% | |
| custom 5354790093066372871 | 239 | 19.7% | |
| custom 5350494494410178752 | 209 | 17.2% | |
| 🔥 | 155 | 12.8% | |
| custom 5350798792843100327 | 70 | 5.76% | |
| custom 5388774674630999540 | 70 | 5.76% | |
| 🎄 | 60 | 4.94% | |
| 👍 | 47 | 3.87% | |
| ❤🔥 | 45 | 3.70% | |
| 🌚 | 18 | 1.48% | |
| 😁 | 9 | 0.741% | |
| 🦄 | 5 | 0.412% | |
| 🌭 | 4 | 0.329% | |
| 😘 | 4 | 0.329% | |
| 🍓 | 3 | 0.247% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 0.165% | |
| 🤪 | 2 | 0.165% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.082% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,215 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 20 November 2025 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tasty_lab. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 32 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 November 2025 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Posted without readable text
👍9custom 53504944944101787525custom 53507798047926828424
🌈 РИК И МОРТИ SKITTLES Скитлс рассыпаны по всей мультивселенной, радуга заряжена, портал открыт — новая линейка ZEF VAPE × TASTY LAB уже здесь! 🍬 Скитлс на любой вкус 😮💨 20 000 затяжек 🦋 20 вкусов 1➖Скитлс лесные ягоды 2➖Скитлс энергетик 3➖Скитлс манго 4➖Скитлс персик 5➖Скитлс голубика 6➖Клубничный скитлс 7➖Арбузный скитлс 8➖Вишнёвый скитлс 9➖Малиновый скитлс 10➖Ежевичный скитлс 11➖Скитлс клюква …
custom 53887746746309995407🦄5custom 53547900930663728713
😍ВСЕЛЕННАЯ РИК И МОРТИ😍 🦋 В ассортименте их одноразок запутался уже я сам, но это и побудило на создание данного ролика! ➡️ В этой видеозаписи я расскажу про особенности каждой из имеющихся в арсенале «видов» Рик и Морти. Разберёмся! Спасибо, ZEF VAPE: https://t.me/zefvape
🔥11custom 53507798047926828424custom 53504944944101787523
Розыгрыш PlayStation 5 и GTA 6 🎁 Для участия нужно подписаться на: - ZEF VAPE - TASTY LAB - 21 КАНАЛ - 21 NEWS Этого уже достаточно. Но если хотите повысить свои шансы, участвуйте в дополнительных активностях и ищите секретные коды - они будут появляться по ходу розыгрыша во всех 4х каналах. Итоги подведём 10.09.2026 в 20:00 по Москве.
🔥29👍11🌭4
Вилли Вонка, подвинься 😋 Найдёшь золотой Morty Smith — заберёшь 1 000 000 ₽. Теперь открывать коробку будет чуточку волнительнее 🫨
custom 538877467463099954018custom 53504944944101787526custom 53507798047926828425
🥒 RICK AND MORTY BAD TRIP Пристегнитесь. Путешествие будет незабываемым, ярким и очень вкусным — легендарная линейка ZEF VAPE × TASTY LAB! 😶🌫️ Атмосфера безумного путешествия 🥑 Ягоды, фрукты, напитки и сладости 🥒 30 вкусов 1➖Арбуз малина 2➖Банан кокос 3➖Барбарис энергетик 4➖Виноград энергетик 5➖Гранат клубника 6➖Гранат смородина 7➖Грейпфрутовый швепс 8➖Киви личи 9➖Киви маракуйя гуава 10➖Клубника …
🔥12custom 53504944944101787523custom 53507798047926828423
Чёрная смородина - это база или вкус на любителя? 🫐
🌚11custom 53504944944101787524💯2
Video, posted without a caption
custom 53507798047926828425🔥1custom 53504944944101787521
Posted without readable text
custom 535479009306637287124custom 53504944944101787525custom 53507798047926828425custom 53507987928431003272
Posted without readable text
custom 535479009306637287115custom 53507798047926828424custom 53504944944101787523custom 53887746746309995402
🪞ОНИ ВЕРНУЛИСЬ!🪞 Рик и Морти снова с нами, поэтому пробуем новинки одноразок BAD ACID и ZOMBIE😈 🔤🔤🔠 🔤🔠🔠🔠 30000 тяг - киви лайм возможность менять крепость и кислинку 🔠🟢🔠🔤🔠🔠23000 тяг - персик малина Каналы: ZEF TASTY LAB 🚨 Контент является строго ознакомительной информацией и не призывает к употреблению никотиносодержащей продукции
🔥9custom 53504944944101787522custom 53507798047926828422
Posted without readable text
custom 535077980479268284218custom 53887746746309995405custom 53504944944101787523custom 53507987928431003273👍1custom 53547900930663728711
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @tasty_lab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@tasty_lab named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TASTY LAB” (@tasty_lab), 13,361 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tasty_lab.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.