Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Прямая линия с Н.Платошкиным

Channel

Прямая линия с Н.Платошкиным

@ZNSourfuture

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

33,876subscribers

+119 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001684441613
TypeChannel
Username@ZNSourfuture
DescriptionДанный канал даёт возможность получать оперативно информацию от Н.Платошкина и А.Глазковой
Created28 June 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ZNSourfuture

Growth

33,75733,89633,826.56 August 2026 — 33,757 subscribers6 August 2026 — 33,759 subscribers7 August 2026 — 33,763 subscribers8 August 2026 — 33,778 subscribers9 August 2026 — 33,823 subscribers10 August 2026 — 33,829 subscribers11 August 2026 — 33,841 subscribers12 August 2026 — 33,849 subscribers13 August 2026 — 33,850 subscribers15 August 2026 — 33,852 subscribers16 August 2026 — 33,854 subscribers17 August 2026 — 33,855 subscribers18 August 2026 — 33,856 subscribers19 August 2026 — 33,858 subscribers20 August 2026 — 33,846 subscribers21 August 2026 — 33,861 subscribers23 August 2026 — 33,868 subscribers25 August 2026 — 33,864 subscribers27 August 2026 — 33,863 subscribers28 August 2026 — 33,886 subscribers30 August 2026 — 33,896 subscribers31 August 2026 — 33,878 subscribers1 September 2026 — 33,875 subscribers2 September 2026 — 33,874 subscribers3 September 2026 — 33,870 subscribers5 September 2026 — 33,876 subscribers33,8766 August 20265 September 2026
26 measurements spanning 30 days, net +119. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33,736–33,917 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 02:5933,876+6
3 Sept 2026, 06:0733,870-4
2 Sept 2026, 04:2633,874-1
1 Sept 2026, 01:4833,875-3
31 Aug 2026, 01:2433,878-18
30 Aug 2026, 00:5633,896+10
28 Aug 2026, 23:1233,886+23
27 Aug 2026, 04:2633,863-1
25 Aug 2026, 01:0733,864-4
23 Aug 2026, 14:4633,868+7
21 Aug 2026, 22:2933,861+15
20 Aug 2026, 17:0433,846-12
19 Aug 2026, 15:4133,858+2
18 Aug 2026, 15:1233,856+1
17 Aug 2026, 18:2333,855+1
16 Aug 2026, 16:4633,854+2
15 Aug 2026, 00:3433,852+2
13 Aug 2026, 18:0733,850+1
12 Aug 2026, 14:0533,849+8
11 Aug 2026, 15:2733,841first reading

Engagement

112 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.6%
avg views ÷ 33,876 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,970
76 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
76
of 112 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 September 2026
Posts held112 (30 July 20267 September 2026)
Views total529,480
Reactions total39,124
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Sept 2026, 01:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,500
Videos
371
Links
1,780

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 52m
Average length
4m 11s

Measured directly from 27 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

57,542 reactions across 112 posts, in 49 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍25,12743.7%
🔥12,36521.5%
💯6,09110.6%
5,76710.0%
🤬2,3634.11%
🤣1,3002.26%
😡1,0111.76%
❤‍🔥9291.61%
👏6801.18%
💊4800.834%
🤔4080.709%
2130.37%
😱1640.285%
🤯940.163%
🙉780.136%
🖕750.13%
🤝710.123%
😢410.071%
🥱320.056%
🌚270.047%
29 further kinds2260.393%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 112 of the 112 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 57,542 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 112 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Sept 2026, 10:23 UTC≈3,150 views264 reactionsread 8 September 2026

https://youtu.be/XGG9myzsIKM?is=pMuYPUW9luDXwczz

🔥180👍77321💊1

7 Sept 2026, 04:42 UTC≈3,900 views337 reactionsread 8 September 2026

ПОДКЛЮЧАЙТЕСЬ! Сегодня, в 18:00 ЮТУБ https://youtube.com/live/zSm8IBLnw1Y РУТУБ https://rutube.ru/video/5e66da3c5091c0f0aee572a0f8930837/

👍268🔥45203💊1

6 Sept 2026, 20:30 UTC≈4,380 views448 reactionsread 8 September 2026

Агитбригада КПРФ и ДЗНС в Крыму. Мы сильнее всех!

💯297🔥69👍54❤‍🔥138💊5👀1🤝1

6 Sept 2026, 20:30 UTC≈4,330 views421 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥264👍123💯179❤‍🔥4💊4

6 Sept 2026, 17:31 UTC≈4,650 views407 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Photo

ПРИГЛАШАЕМ НА МЕРОПРИЯТИЕ! ВЫСТУПЛЕНИЕ НИКОЛАЯ ПЛАТОШКИНА ИСТОРИЯ ВЕНЕСУЭЛЫ. УГО ЧАВЕС • РОБЕРТ КЕННЕДИ: УПУЩЕННЫЙ ШАНС МИРОВОЙ ИСТОРИИ Платошкин Николай Николаевич ВЫСТУПЛЕНИЕ СОСТОИТСЯ. 10 сентября 2026 в 19:00 часов в Интеллектуальном центре URSS (Москва, Нахимовский проспект, 56) ПО СЛУЧАЮ ВЫХОДА В СВЕТ КНИГ «ИСТОРИЯ ВЕНЕСУЭЛЫ: УГО ЧАВЕС и его знаменитый эксперимент „Социализм XXI века“» «РОБЕРТ КЕННЕДИ: Упущен

🔥252👍12424💊4❤‍🔥1🖕1🤝1

5 Sept 2026, 17:37 UTC≈4,810 views488 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Forwarded from @glazkovaaeVideo

Video, posted without a caption

🔥338👍10347

5 Sept 2026, 15:02 UTC≈4,690 views469 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Forwarded from @krasnoeradioVideo

Как прекратить блокировки интернета в России? Анжелика Глазкова о законопроекте КПРФ #Глазкова #КПРФ #Блокировки #Выборы

🔥306👍142👏1261🤬1😡1

4 Sept 2026, 05:25 UTC≈6,700 views737 reactionsread 8 September 2026

Товарищи Ашихмин и Варанкин, вам не стыдно? Руководство КПРФ Сахалина (Ашихмин, Варанкин) сообщило, что День Победы над Японией был восстановлен в 2023 году благодаря фракции КПРФ в Госдуме. Но как раз они-то прекрасно знают, что восстановлен этот праздник после обращения народного депутата Глазковой к президенту. Когда Глазкова приезжала помогать коммунистам Сахалина и Курил ( по их просьбе) на выборах в 2023 год

👍479💯206🤔1911💊10😡10👀2

3 Sept 2026, 19:51 UTC≈7,090 views553 reactionsread 8 September 2026

Медведь и косатка они если честно не пара, не пара, не пара.

🔥280🤣166👍57💯418👀1

3 Sept 2026, 19:50 UTC≈7,180 views715 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥297🔥188🤣127👍807💊65👏3

3 Sept 2026, 09:08 UTC≈6,620 views589 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Forwarded from @krasnoeradio

Победа над Японией: Спасибо Глазковой! Важную дату Победы вернули ЮТУБ https://youtu.be/3j_NnLl3Z8k РУТУБ https://rutube.ru/video/29b8e3a720cd56e56ff5c92e71f542fc/ ВК https://vkvideo.ru/video-212582457_456242629

👍465🔥7736❤‍🔥4🤨3💊2💯1🤬1

3 Sept 2026, 07:31 UTC≈7,560 views673 reactionsread 8 September 2026

КПРФ и ДЗНС активно агитируют в Крыму. Там от КПРФ баллотируется народный депутат Глазкова ( номер 8 в бюллетене)

👍542🔥91❤‍🔥1712💊3🤝3🤣3🤬2

Showing the 12 most recent of 112 posts we hold for @ZNSourfuture. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

2 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Выборы губернатора Алтайского края (2023) (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…archive.org/web/20230712051430/https://t.me/sovietAltai/966|url-status=live}}{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/ZNSourfuture/639|title=Прямая линия с…”
read 23 August 2026
Платошкин, Николай Николаевич (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…archive.org/web/20240330144516/https://t.me/krasnoeradio/3940|url-status=live}}{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/ZNSourfuture/2439|title=Прямая линия…”
read 23 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Прямая линия с Н.Платошкиным” (@ZNSourfuture), 33,876 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZNSourfuture.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.