Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Красное Радио

Channel

Красное Радио

@krasnoeradio

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

18,417subscribers

+69 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001633923169
TypeChannel
Username@krasnoeradio
Created11 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held51
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/krasnoeradio

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

18,32718,44518,3866 August 2026 — 18,348 subscribers6 August 2026 — 18,348 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,354 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,377 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,376 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,380 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,378 subscribers13 August 2026 — 18,376 subscribers14 August 2026 — 18,379 subscribers16 August 2026 — 18,372 subscribers18 August 2026 — 18,373 subscribers19 August 2026 — 18,374 subscribers20 August 2026 — 18,370 subscribers21 August 2026 — 18,385 subscribers23 August 2026 — 18,329 subscribers25 August 2026 — 18,327 subscribers26 August 2026 — 18,330 subscribers28 August 2026 — 18,327 subscribers29 August 2026 — 18,360 subscribers30 August 2026 — 18,362 subscribers31 August 2026 — 18,358 subscribers1 September 2026 — 18,356 subscribers2 September 2026 — 18,357 subscribers4 September 2026 — 18,362 subscribers9 September 2026 — 18,363 subscribers12 September 2026 — 18,359 subscribers13 September 2026 — 18,363 subscribers15 September 2026 — 18,371 subscribers17 September 2026 — 18,368 subscribers28 September 2026 — 18,425 subscribers5 October 2026 — 18,415 subscribers9 October 2026 — 18,425 subscribers13 October 2026 — 18,445 subscribers17 October 2026 — 18,444 subscribers18 October 2026 — 18,439 subscribers19 October 2026 — 18,438 subscribers20 October 2026 — 18,437 subscribers23 October 2026 — 18,432 subscribers26 October 2026 — 18,428 subscribers28 October 2026 — 18,424 subscribers29 October 2026 — 18,427 subscribers30 October 2026 — 18,424 subscribers31 October 2026 — 18,428 subscribers1 November 2026 — 18,429 subscribers2 November 2026 — 18,432 subscribers3 November 2026 — 18,431 subscribers4 November 2026 — 18,437 subscribers5 November 2026 — 18,434 subscribers6 November 2026 — 18,431 subscribers7 November 2026 — 18,426 subscribers8 November 2026 — 18,417 subscribers18,4176 August 20268 November 2026
51 measurements spanning 94 days, net +69. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,309–18,463 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 51
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 11:4918,417-9
7 Nov 2026, 06:3418,426-5
6 Nov 2026, 07:3418,431-3
5 Nov 2026, 07:5618,434-3
4 Nov 2026, 10:2518,437+6
3 Nov 2026, 08:0018,431-1
2 Nov 2026, 10:4718,432+3
1 Nov 2026, 09:4418,429+1
31 Oct 2026, 08:0518,428+4
30 Oct 2026, 09:4518,424-3
29 Oct 2026, 06:2118,427+3
28 Oct 2026, 06:0018,424-4
26 Oct 2026, 03:0918,428-4
23 Oct 2026, 05:2518,432-5
20 Oct 2026, 22:5518,437-1
19 Oct 2026, 19:3018,438-1
18 Oct 2026, 19:0718,439-5
17 Oct 2026, 21:2918,444-1
13 Oct 2026, 13:1618,445+20
9 Oct 2026, 10:5918,425first reading

Engagement

158 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.2%
avg views ÷ 18,417 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,790
40 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.67%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 158 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held158 (27 July 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total111,711
Reactions total9,684
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 04:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3h 10m
Average length
3m 35s

Measured directly from 53 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

39,568 reactions across 157 posts, in 44 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍19,00548.0%
🔥5,59014.1%
💯3,0897.81%
❤2,7346.91%
🤬2,2225.62%
⚡2,1655.47%
😁1,0792.73%
🤣8072.04%
👎4211.06%
🤯4181.06%
👏3790.958%
😡3210.811%
❤‍🔥2560.647%
💊2400.607%
🤔2270.574%
🙈2160.546%
🎉660.167%
🙏570.144%
😱550.139%
🤨340.086%
24 further kinds1870.473%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 157 of the 158 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39,568 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 158 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
351
across the posts below
Posts paid on
36
of 157 we hold a reading for · 23%
Most on one post
251
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @krasnoeradio. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 158 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 40 posts held from the last 30 days (17.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 16:52 UTC≈1,400 views346 reactions1 Starread 8 November 2026
Video

❤️ Выражаем искреннюю благодарность Президенту и народу Беларуси за верность исторической памяти и сохранение красного дня календаря - 7 ноября. Для социалистов всего мира это мощный знак верности идеалам социальной справедливости, который вдохновляет левые силы по всему миру. 🤝✊🇧🇾 С уважением, Красное радио

👍285❤31💯22👏3🔥2🤝2⚡1

7 Nov 2026, 16:32 UTC981 views177 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥129👍35❤‍🔥8❤5

7 Nov 2026, 14:42 UTC≈1,410 views225 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥123👍87🔥14❤1

7 Nov 2026, 12:01 UTC≈1,650 views294 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

День 7 ноября - КРАСНЫЙ ДЕНЬ КАЛЕНДАРЯ!

👍242🔥47🤝3❤‍🔥2

7 Nov 2026, 11:13 UTC≈1,660 views278 reactionsread 8 November 2026

https://youtu.be/klFHSC-EQyE Николай Платошкин: горжусь, что родился в СССР! | 7 ноября Короткое поздравление и размышление о значении 7 ноября и советском прошлом. 🎬 Смотреть ролик: RUTUBE — https://rutube.ru/video/0f26d28d606fcec74a3dcd00c656d89e/ VK Видео — https://vkvideo.ru/video-212582457_456242729

❤178🔥54👍43❤‍🔥3

7 Nov 2026, 09:25 UTC≈1,620 views226 reactionsread 8 November 2026

https://youtu.be/Uuly46AsEZc 7 ноября: почему надежда на справедливость жива | Камиль Короткий ролик о надежде на справедливость и значении 7 ноября. 🎬 Смотреть ролик: https://youtu.be/Uuly46AsEZc

👍206❤‍🔥11🔥6❤2👎1

7 Nov 2026, 07:28 UTC≈1,800 views221 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Анжелика Глазкова. Эпидемия бедности

🔥171👍43❤7

7 Nov 2026, 06:52 UTC≈1,760 views191 reactionsread 8 November 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/tVT-o9IcbBs?feature=share 7 ноября: одним — поздравления, другим — новые штрафы! Короткий ролик о разном отношении к памятной дате 7 ноября. 🎬 Смотреть ролик: https://youtube.com/shorts/tVT-o9IcbBs?feature=share

👍169❤16⚡6

7 Nov 2026, 06:24 UTC≈1,750 views246 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Почему они боятся 7 ноября? | Елена Съянова ЮТУБ https://youtu.be/b57n-sFtOBU РУТУБ https://rutube.ru/video/c79f519b2f9774d7bff1967066611d27/

👍225❤10❤‍🔥6⚡2👎1💊1🔥1

7 Nov 2026, 01:19 UTC≈1,850 views202 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Чем мешает дружба народов? Хлобустов отвечает Матвееву и «Царьграду» Олег Хлобустов разбирает заявления Михаила Матвеева и дискуссию о национальном вопросе, дружбе народов и политической повестке. 🎬 Смотреть ролик: YouTube — https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQAtWuvrlTc VK Видео — https://vkvideo.ru/video-212582457_456242727

👍193❤4⚡3🤔2

6 Nov 2026, 12:35 UTC≈2,050 views188 reactionsread 8 November 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbAf0056Eh4 Колпакиди и «Аврора»: зачем вам коммунизм, если главное — прибыль? Захарьящев Дмитрий Захарьящев разбирает дискуссию об «Авроре», коммунистических убеждениях, коммерции и политической ответственности. Чтобы посмотреть ролик, переходите по ссылкам: YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbAf0056Eh4 RUTUBE: https://rutube.ru/video/55ccf62f0904da661f107f78beac5bb1/

👍165🔥13❤5👎5

6 Nov 2026, 11:08 UTC≈2,020 views182 reactionsread 8 November 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSWGXtJrn4M НКВД и ополченцы: как сражалась Москва, когда враг был у ворот | Хлобустов Олег Хлобустов рассказывает о народном ополчении, НКВД, защите Москвы и сохранении памяти о защитниках столицы. Чтобы посмотреть ролик, переходите по ссылкам: YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSWGXtJrn4M RUTUBE: https://rutube.ru/video/b2a9a86035843c4cf531f6ab49ebfe52/ VK Видео: https://v…

👍175❤7

Showing the 12 most recent of 158 posts we hold for @krasnoeradio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@krasnoeradio edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
2 September 2026
Most recent edit
2 September 2026

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Sept 2026, 06:10 UTCAnonymous Poll1,120 voters approx.

Поддерживаете ли Вы решение КПРФ не допускать Платошкина (доверенное лицо КПРФ) к участию в дебатах на телевидении:

  1. Да4%
  2. Нет97%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Aug 2026, 09:24 UTCAnonymous Poll705 voters

Товарищи, как по Вашему, достоин ли такой человек как Спицын быть доверенным лицом КПРФ?

  1. Да13%
  2. Нет87%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 158 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Платошкин, Николай Николаевич (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…archive.org/web/20240330144516/https://t.me/krasnoeradio/3940|url-status=live}}{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/ZNSourfuture/2439|title=Прямая линия…”
read 1 November 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Красное Радио” (@krasnoeradio), 18,417 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/krasnoeradio.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.