Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 43 days, net +495. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34,155–35,357 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 11:19
35,196
+464
15 Sept 2026, 13:38
34,732
-136
14 Sept 2026, 01:19
34,868
+93
12 Sept 2026, 07:17
34,775
-35
10 Sept 2026, 02:56
34,810
+32
6 Sept 2026, 21:38
34,778
+79
4 Sept 2026, 08:36
34,699
+10
3 Sept 2026, 00:05
34,689
+110
1 Sept 2026, 20:16
34,579
+36
31 Aug 2026, 23:18
34,543
-52
30 Aug 2026, 21:23
34,595
-28
29 Aug 2026, 23:05
34,623
-32
29 Aug 2026, 00:37
34,655
+361
27 Aug 2026, 21:53
34,294
-162
26 Aug 2026, 19:13
34,456
-202
25 Aug 2026, 19:22
34,658
-265
24 Aug 2026, 18:16
34,923
-6
22 Aug 2026, 23:27
34,929
-32
21 Aug 2026, 13:58
34,961
-29
20 Aug 2026, 16:43
34,990
first reading
Engagement
371 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 81 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
30.7%
avg views ÷ 35,196 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,800
189 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.233%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
190
of 371 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 183 of 189 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held
371 (4 August 2026 – 23 September 2026)
Views total
2,040,850
Reactions total
4,618
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
23 Sept 2026, 16:06 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈6,980
Videos
≈1,190
Links
≈13,500
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 56s
Average length
23s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8,727 reactions across 335 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👎
3,577
41.0%
👍
2,086
23.9%
😁
989
11.3%
🙈
486
5.57%
🥰
455
5.21%
👏
434
4.97%
😭
364
4.17%
👀
137
1.57%
🤩
102
1.17%
🤔
97
1.11%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 355 of the 371 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,142 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 371 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Первое заседание Госдумы IX созыва может пройти уже 30 сентября. Ключевой вопрос повестки — распределение комитетов.
По традиции между оппозиционными партиями и 🐻«Единой Россией» будет заключено «пакетное соглашение». Партия власти заберет около половины руководящих мест. Остальные партии поделят кресла пропорционально размеру своих фракций.
Учитывая итоги выборов, в новом созыве расклад поменяется: 🚶♀️«Новые люди…
Подведение итогов выборов в Госдуму выходит на финишную прямую. ЦИК обрабатывает последние протоколы, и общая картина уже ясна: парламент останется пятипартийным. Поэтому менять название канала нам не придется. Мы по-прежнему «Пять партий».
Интрига конфигурации нового созыва Госдумы сохранялась практически до самого конца обработки данных в ЦИК. Тем не менее, 🟨 «Справедливой России» удалось преодолеть пятипроцентный…
🎤🟨 Феноменом выборов стала очень большая явка.
#мнение_партийца
Михаил Делягин, зампред комитета Госдумы по экономической политике:
Причем, действительно, люди очень хотели проголосовать, это оказалось неожиданностью. Скажем, в Москве, которая находилась под ударом, и об этом было сообщено, никто не скрывал ничего, ПВО сработало замечательно, но все понимали ситуацию. Так вот, в Москве выстроились очереди на избир…
#цитатадня
👔Честно говоря, после таких новостей становится немного зябко... Только прошли выборы, и тут нам сообщают (пока в пространстве собственно Минфина), что личные деньги «добровольно-принудительно» (как я понимаю) перегоняют в цифровой формат.👔
🟥 Нина Останина о переводе заработной платы сотрудников Минфина в цифровой рубль.
👉 Подписаться на Пять партий
❗️Важное объявление для всех политиков и партийцев!
Если вы хотите стать соавтором главного канала о политических партиях и внутрипартийных раскладах или поделится мнением вашей партии по какой-либо теме, пишите нам в бот обратной связи @FivePartiesBot.
Свои колонки у нас эксклюзивно публикуют: Сергей Миронов, Юрий Афонин, Сергей Перминов, Сардана Авксентьева, Мария Воропаева и многие другие. Присоединяйтесь к парт…
🧷🔗📎🖇📐📏💬Эксперты оценили прошедшие выборы в Госдуму девятого созыва, специально для канала "Пять партий":
🗣Валерий Прохоров, заместитель директора Центра ПРИСП, член Российской ассоциации политических консультантов (РАПК), автор телеграм-канала "Телеграбля":
"Итоги голосования показывают изменение самой логики электорального поведения. Для части избирателей, критически настроенных к власти, выборы могли потерять преж…
Депутат Госдумы от 🧴«Новых людей» 🧴Ксения Горячева точно не проходит в нижнюю палату Парламента. Последние пять лет она представляла Петербург, но на этот раз шла первым номером в территориальной группе по Тульской, Калужской, Смоленской и Тверской областям.
По словам самой Горячевой, явка там оказалась значительно ниже ожидаемой, и «партия здесь ни при чём».
Для 🧴«Новых людей» это может стать ощутимой потерей. Гор…
❗️Выбывают из Госдумы в девятом созыве по первым инсайдерским данным:
🟨Дмитрий Гусев и 🟥Сергей Обухов — ключевые идеологи, ответственные за информационное освещение работы и во многом — за избирательные кампании Справедливой России и КПРФ соответственно.
🟥 Коммунисты также, предварительно, теряют экс-губернатора Иркутской области, зампреда комитета по энергетике в прошлом созыве Сергея Левченко. Кроме того, вероятн…
🚶♀️ «Единая Россия» сформирует крупнейшую фракцию в Госдуме в истории партии: не менее 348 мандатов, больше трех четвертей мест. 139 «списочников» и 209 одномандатников. Прежний рекорд держался с 2016 года — 343 места. И главное: результат получен в беспрецедентно сложных условиях.
Нынешняя Дума избиралась на фоне специальной военной операции, которая идет уже почти пять лет. Добавьте топливный кризис, удары по скл…
На фоне рекордных показателей в Госдуме на региональных выборах у 🚶♀️ «Единой России» обнаружились слабые места. Партия власти показала самые низкие результаты в заксобраниях пяти субъектов:
▫️ Карелия — 28,46% (в 2021 году — 28,96%)
▫️ Вологодская область — 32,14% (в 2021 году — 35,65%)
▫️ Кировская область — 33,5% (в 2021 году — 27,26%)
▫️ Томская область — 38,74% (в 2021 году — 33,21%)
▫️ Новгородская область — …
ЦИК подвела итоги региональных выборов в заксобрания. Главный аутсайдер — 🟨 «Справедливая Россия»: эсеры лишились сразу десятка фракций.
🟨 СР не прошла пятипроцентный барьер и потеряла представительство в Санкт-Петербурге, Ленинградской, Московской, Тюменской, Омской, Самарской и Тверской областях, Красноярском крае, Мордовии и ХМАО. В этих регионах партия имела представительство в предыдущих созывах, но теперь лиши…
👍15👎10👀4😭3
Showing the 12 most recent of 371 posts we hold for @agendarussia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 10 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Кого бы вы не хотели видеть в следующем созыве Госдумы?
Опрос для жителей Челябинской области. #уходящие_натуры
🐻Павлов Владимир Викторович — округ №18929%
🐻Бурматов Владимир Владимирович — округ №19028%
🟨Гартунг Валерий Карлович — округ №19119%
🐻Бахметьев Виталий Викторович — округ №19226%
🐻Колесников Олег Алексеевич — округ №19326%
🐻 Вяткин Дмитрий Федорович — избран по списку28%
🐻Голиков Олег Александрович — избран по списку26%
🟥Берулава Михаил Николаевич — избран по списку55%
🟨Швецов Василий Георгиевич — избран по списку15%
🧴Скрозникова Анна Валерьевна — избрана по списку12%
The shares total 264%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Кого бы вы НЕ хотели видеть в следующем созыве Госдумы?
Опрос для жителей Республики Северная Осетия - Алания #уходящие_натуры
🐻Таймазов Артур Борисович — округ №25 (Северо-Осетинский)29%
🐻Макиев Зураб Гайозович — (избран по партийному списку)12%
🟥Кочиев Роберт Иванович — (избран по партийному списку)50%
🟨Каноков Тимур Борисович — (избран по партийному списку)9%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 371 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 23 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 53 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 127 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@agendarussia named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@radio_sputnik named in 1 post, 7 September 2026 – 7 September 2026
@ivenskikhirina named in 1 post, 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 3 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Восьмой созыв @rugosduma · 28,801 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
САРДАНА @RealSardana · 30,302 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
Выборка @vyborka · 39,369 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 31 August 2026
Выборный @vibornyk · 101,270 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 16 August 2026
НЕЧАЕВ @nechaev_official · 36,899 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 1 September 2026
ЛДПР @zhirinovskylive · 22,031 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 September 2026
ЦИК России @cikrossii · 29,236 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
Партия «Новые люди» @partynewpeople · 83,546 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 August 2026
СТРАНОВЕД @stranoved · 115,552 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 14 August 2026
Зеленая папка @greenfolder · 34,148 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 3 September 2026
ГосСовет 2.0 @GosSovet · 22,418 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 September 2026
ДАВАНКОВ // Вице-спикер Госдумы @davankov · 225,326 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
ПолитологОрлов @politolog_Orlov · 23,946 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 17 September 2026
Замгубернатора @matrosou · 37,743 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 1 September 2026
ФоРГО @FoRGO_official · 48,631 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 26 August 2026
16 негритят @Gubery · 84,149 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 August 2026
Солодовников. Кратко @solodovnikovia · 121,882 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026
Единая Россия. Официально @er_molnia · 49,170 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 26 August 2026
ДумаТВ.Brief @dumabrief · 26,769 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 September 2026
Станислав Дружинин: правда о важном @svdruzhinin · 31,897 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 7 September 2026
КПРФ @kompartya · 23,861 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 16 September 2026
Политбюро 2.0 @politburo2 · 39,791 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 30 August 2026
Яна Лантратова @lantratovaDOBRO · 224,907 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 August 2026
Дума ТВ @dumatv · 80,767 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 36 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
2 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Yana Lantratova(en.wikipedia.org) “…Oblast,” 1st class (2022).{{Cite web |title=Пять партий |url=https://t.me/agendarussia/10961 |access-date=2026-06-08 |website=Telegram}}
* Order…” read 13 September 2026
Лантратова, Яна Валерьевна(ru.wikipedia.org) “…перед Херсонской областью» I степени (2022){{Cite web |url=https://t.me/agendarussia/10961 |title=Яна Лантратова. Пять партий |access-date=2023-07-20…” read 13 September 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пять партий” (@agendarussia), 35,196 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/agendarussia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.