Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
64 measurements spanning 94 days, net +261. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34,134–35,521 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 07:50
34,962
+25
7 Nov 2026, 00:07
34,937
+173
6 Nov 2026, 00:24
34,764
+25
5 Nov 2026, 02:40
34,739
+109
3 Nov 2026, 22:59
34,630
-198
3 Nov 2026, 02:17
34,828
-90
2 Nov 2026, 00:26
34,918
+164
31 Oct 2026, 21:05
34,754
-57
30 Oct 2026, 18:21
34,811
-132
29 Oct 2026, 21:27
34,943
-118
28 Oct 2026, 22:39
35,061
+53
27 Oct 2026, 18:47
35,008
+116
26 Oct 2026, 17:15
34,892
+124
25 Oct 2026, 18:26
34,768
-4
24 Oct 2026, 18:51
34,772
-62
23 Oct 2026, 21:18
34,834
+10
22 Oct 2026, 22:59
34,824
+144
21 Oct 2026, 17:37
34,680
-48
20 Oct 2026, 14:09
34,728
-55
19 Oct 2026, 16:56
34,783
first reading
Engagement
731 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 172 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
28.0%
avg views ÷ 34,962 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,780
226 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
226
of 731 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 209 of 226 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held
731 (4 August 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total
2,210,330
Reactions total
2,669
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 05:59 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
10m 15s
Average length
1m 28s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
13,628 reactions across 670 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👎
5,450
40.0%
👍
3,765
27.6%
😁
1,442
10.6%
🙈
676
4.96%
🥰
652
4.78%
👏
588
4.31%
😭
536
3.93%
🤔
206
1.51%
👀
173
1.27%
🤩
140
1.03%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 690 of the 731 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,043 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 731 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 226 posts held from the last 30 days (2.21%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🧴«Новые люди» готовятся к кадровым перестройкам. Руководитель исполкома партии Айрат Ахметзянов может возглавить аппарат думской фракции НЛ. Его кандидатуру подтвердил вице-спикер Госдумы Владислав Даванков: по его словам, у Ахметзянова есть большой опыт государственной службы, а сам он «зарекомендовал себя как профессионал».
Исполком НЛ отвечает за текущую работу партии, связь с региональными отделениями и организа…
Профильный комитет Госдумы рекомендовал отклонить пакет избирательных инициатив 🟥КПРФ. Главная из них — проект нового Избирательного кодекса России объёмом 453 страницы, который коммунисты внесли ещё в феврале 2023 года.
В 🟥КПРФ предлагали вернуть однодневное голосование и отказаться от ДЭГ, перенести единый день голосования на третье воскресенье марта и запретить «паровозы» — практику, когда известные политики возг…
Новость о сокращении аппаратов обычно вызывает у обывателей щенячий восторг
Хотя на самом деле это ещё один шаг по превращению Госдумы и палаты регионов в клоунаду
Меньше качественной экспертизы в парламенте - больше хайпа и эпатажа, больше влияния исполнительной власти и частных интересов
Хотите больше новостей в стиле «В Госдуме предложили кастрировать каждого третьего петуха»? - кушайте, не обляпайтесь
🥴❤️ Сны российских депутатов при температуре 40 градусов
#странное_в_эфире
Председатель комитета Госдумы по финансовому рынку Анатолий Аксаков поделился со своими подписчиками интересным сновидением. Аксакову, не много не мало, приснилось, что он играет в шахматы с Президентом США Дональдом Трампом. Но и это еще не все — после игры два гроссмейстера должны были провести важные переговоры:
Я ему: «Дональд, мне пора…
Вам знакомо выражение «голос общества»? Так вот тут не голос, а требование: разберитесь. И его услышали! Самокатчики-курьеры получат жёсткие правила движения и строгий регламент эксплуатации.
То, что подключились и Минтранс, и Единая Россия означает, что высокий социальный запрос есть, и решение его уже находится в безотлагательной фазе. Чтобы изменения почувствовали на себе, норматив нужен к весне, к началу сезона,…
✏️Знакомимся с депутатами Госдумы IX созыва
Совместный проект канала "Пять партий" с каналом "Восьмой созыв".
Корытников Павел Владиславович
🧴 Фракция: «Новые люди»
🗳 Избран: по федеральному партийному списку (региональная группа № 7: город Санкт-Петербург)
📌 Досье
▫️Образование и управленческий бэкграунд
Родился 2 сентября 1974 года в Ленинграде (ныне Санкт-Петербург). В 1997 году окончил Санкт-Петербургский ин…
📣 Минтранс составил проект ужесточения правил для электросамокатов, согласно которому запрещается выезжать на тротуары курьерам, пользователям транспорта тяжелее 35 кг, а также детям младше 16 лет. Партийцы прокомментировали эти предложения:
🟦 Леонид Слуцкий, председатель ЛДПР:
"Наша фракция давно этого добивается. Почему пешеход должен оглядываться, чтобы уступить дорогу курьеру на электровелосипеде? Одно столкнове…
Экс-депутат Госдумы 🟥 Михаил Матвеев, ныне депутат Самарской губернской думы, стал помощником на общественных началах председателя ЦК КПРФ 🟥 Геннадия Зюганова. Он будет заниматься вопросами местного самоуправления и миграционной политики. Кроме того, при думской фракции КПРФ, вероятно, создадут специальный экспертный совет по этим направлениям, который может возглавить Матвеев.
Обе темы хорошо знакомы Матвееву. В во…
Изменение границ одномандатных округов может приводить к снижению явки на выборах.
#политические_исследования
К такому выводу пришёл в своей статье «Побочный эффект редистриктинга: реконфигурация электорального окружения и явка на выборы» исследователь Вадим Девятников. Он изучил результаты региональных выборов в 18 субъектах России за 2014–2023 годы и обнаружил, что последствия редистриктинга зависят прежде всего …
🐻 «Единая Россия» объявила первую акцию в рамках подготовки к своему 25-летнему юбилею, который будет отмечаться 1 декабря. Её посвятят участию женщин в партийной работе. В рамках проекта «Моя история в истории "Единой России"» женщины — члены и сторонницы партии — расскажут о том, какую роль ЕР сыграла в их жизни. Собранные истории объединят в единую юбилейную летопись. Инициатором акции выступило «Женское движение …
Showing the 12 most recent of 731 posts we hold for @agendarussia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@agendarussia edited 6 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
25 September 2026
Most recent edit
18 October 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @agendarussia as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
9 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
25 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
22 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Polls
The 6 most recent of 10 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Кого бы вы не хотели видеть в следующем созыве Госдумы?
Опрос для жителей Челябинской области. #уходящие_натуры
🐻Павлов Владимир Викторович — округ №18929%
🐻Бурматов Владимир Владимирович — округ №19028%
🟨Гартунг Валерий Карлович — округ №19119%
🐻Бахметьев Виталий Викторович — округ №19226%
🐻Колесников Олег Алексеевич — округ №19326%
🐻 Вяткин Дмитрий Федорович — избран по списку28%
🐻Голиков Олег Александрович — избран по списку26%
🟥Берулава Михаил Николаевич — избран по списку55%
🟨Швецов Василий Георгиевич — избран по списку15%
🧴Скрозникова Анна Валерьевна — избрана по списку12%
The shares total 264%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Кого бы вы НЕ хотели видеть в следующем созыве Госдумы?
Опрос для жителей Республики Северная Осетия - Алания #уходящие_натуры
🐻Таймазов Артур Борисович — округ №25 (Северо-Осетинский)29%
🐻Макиев Зураб Гайозович — (избран по партийному списку)12%
🟥Кочиев Роберт Иванович — (избран по партийному списку)50%
🟨Каноков Тимур Борисович — (избран по партийному списку)9%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 731 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 57 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 139 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@agendarussia named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@radio_sputnik named in 1 post, 7 September 2026 – 7 September 2026
@ivenskikhirina named in 1 post, 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 3 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Госдума 2026 @duma_2021 · 20,836 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 28 September 2026
Восьмой созыв @rugosduma · 29,396 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
САРДАНА @RealSardana · 28,970 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
Выборка @vyborka · 39,968 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 31 August 2026
Выборный @vibornyk · 93,296 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 16 August 2026
НЕЧАЕВ @nechaev_official · 37,029 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 1 September 2026
ЛДПР @zhirinovskylive · 21,721 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 September 2026
ЦИК России @cikrossii · 29,089 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
Партия «Новые люди» @partynewpeople · 82,121 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 August 2026
СТРАНОВЕД @stranoved · 116,157 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 14 August 2026
Зеленая папка @greenfolder · 34,549 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 3 September 2026
ГосСовет 2.0 @GosSovet · 22,500 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 September 2026
ДАВАНКОВ // Вице-спикер Госдумы @davankov · 212,460 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
ПолитологОрлов @politolog_Orlov · 20,699 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 17 September 2026
Замгубернатора @matrosou · 39,089 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 1 September 2026
ФоРГО @FoRGO_official · 48,517 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 26 August 2026
Дмитрий Гусев @gusev_tg · 19,909 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 27 September 2026
16 негритят @Gubery · 83,493 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 August 2026
Солодовников. Кратко @solodovnikovia · 110,404 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026
Единая Россия. Официально @er_molnia · 55,542 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 26 August 2026
ДумаТВ.Brief @dumabrief · 24,897 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 September 2026
Станислав Дружинин: правда о важном @svdruzhinin · 31,947 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 7 September 2026
КПРФ @kompartya · 24,754 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 16 September 2026
Политбюро 2.0 @politburo2 · 39,865 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 30 August 2026
This channel appears in 38 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
2 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Yana Lantratova(en.wikipedia.org) “…occupation authorities in Ukraine.{{Cite web |title=Пять партий |url=https://t.me/agendarussia/10961 |access-date=2026-06-08 |website=Telegram}}<ref…” read 1 November 2026
Лантратова, Яна Валерьевна(ru.wikipedia.org) “…перед Херсонской областью» I степени (2022){{Cite web |url=https://t.me/agendarussia/10961 |title=Яна Лантратова. Пять партий |access-date=2023-07-20…” read 1 November 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пять партий” (@agendarussia), 34,962 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/agendarussia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.