Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Телеграбля

Channel

Телеграбля

@prokhorov11

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,493subscribers

+832 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001491344343
TypeChannel
Username@prokhorov11
Created29 April 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/prokhorov11

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9,66110,51610,088.56 August 2026 — 9,661 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,661 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,673 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,844 subscribers13 August 2026 — 9,961 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,081 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,123 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,161 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,199 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,236 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,290 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,349 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,368 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,365 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,362 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,360 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,361 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,345 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,339 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,343 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,367 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,391 subscribers5 September 2026 — 10,422 subscribers8 September 2026 — 10,491 subscribers11 September 2026 — 10,502 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,448 subscribers15 September 2026 — 10,516 subscribers17 September 2026 — 10,493 subscribers10,4936 August 202617 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 42 days, net +832. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,533–10,644 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 05:3910,493-23
15 Sept 2026, 03:1510,516+68
13 Sept 2026, 10:5810,448-54
11 Sept 2026, 13:1710,502+11
8 Sept 2026, 20:1710,491+69
5 Sept 2026, 14:5810,422+31
3 Sept 2026, 19:0010,391+24
2 Sept 2026, 13:1810,367+24
1 Sept 2026, 10:2410,343+4
31 Aug 2026, 07:0610,339-6
30 Aug 2026, 06:3210,345-16
29 Aug 2026, 07:2710,361+1
28 Aug 2026, 05:5410,360-2
27 Aug 2026, 06:2510,362-3
26 Aug 2026, 03:1110,365-3
25 Aug 2026, 04:0710,368+19
24 Aug 2026, 01:3710,349+59
22 Aug 2026, 12:0410,290+54
20 Aug 2026, 23:2310,236+37
19 Aug 2026, 22:2610,199first reading

Engagement

107 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
39.2%
avg views ÷ 10,493 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,120
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
24
of 107 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held107 (31 July 202629 August 2026)
Views total98,780
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 15:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 34s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC≈1,500 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

#Нам_пишут 📥🇷🇺🗳️Великолепное прислали! Шикарная листовка от новолюдов – я лучше не видел никогда... Это у нас в Бутово седня утром увидела

29 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC≈2,090 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

#Разгребаем_повестку 🗳️🇷🇺⚖️ В подборке экспертных мнений на канале «Пять партий» обсудили с коллегами шансы снятого с дистанции, а затем возвращённого в предвыборную гонку кандидата от КПРФ Михаила Матвеева. 🗣Валерий Прохоров, заместитель директора Центра ПРИСП, член Российской ассоциации политических консультантов (РАПК), автор телеграм-канала "Телеграбля": "Для Матвеева это почти идеальный сценарий. Сначала его сни

29 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC≈2,490 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

#Секреты_политцеха 🗳️💻🤫 Где-то (где – большой секрет!) сейчас одна распределённая по всей стране и не присутствующая в самом избирательном округе команда ведёт кампанию оппозиционного кандидата почти без полей, офлайн-агитации и классического АПМ. Без привычного набора: дворов, встреч, кубов, раздачи макулатуры и прочих ништяков, листовок, газет, наружки, а главное – постоянного физического присутствия кандидата и к

28 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC≈3,340 viewsread 29 August 2026

#Просто_новости 🗳️🇷🇺🏍️ 🚨 История о том, как можно въехать в большую политику на мотоцикле, устроив небольшое ДТП. Не было бы счастья, как говорится. А ЛДПР пополнилась яркой личностью...

28 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC≈3,430 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

#Домыслы_и_смыслы 🇪🇸🤦‍♂️🇮🇱🆚🇬🇲То что нужно знать про «антисемитизм», чтобы не налететь на обвинение в разжигании от какого-нибудь просвещённого израильтянина. 🧳 А ведь ещё сам Штирлиц знал - нельзя трогать чужие чемоданы!

28 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC≈3,490 viewsread 29 August 2026

#Секреты_политцеха 🗳️🇷🇺🤔 Интересно, коммунисты под готовый слоган кандидата нашли или слоган под человека придумывали?

28 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC≈3,640 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

#Секреты_политцеха 🗳️🤫 Вопрос о появлении «нового Жириновского» сегодня, на мой взгляд, утратил актуальность. Политическая среда изменилась настолько, что харизма сама по себе уже не гарантирует кандидатам успеха в дебатах. Более того, новый политик, который попробует слишком активно «ярчить», скорее рискует попасть в категорию неформата — непривычного, странного, даже немного «не от мира сего», — чем стать новой бол

27 Aug 2026, 11:42 UTC≈4,650 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

#Хвалим_валим 🗳️ 🇷🇺 👮‍♀️ У этой первой полосы предвыборной газеты кандидата в депутаты Юрия Солдатова есть главное достоинство, которого катастрофически не хватает большинству агитационных газет: её хочется открыть. Обычно контакт избирателя с предвыборной агитухой заканчивается ещё в момент первого соприкосновения. Кандидат смотрит с обложки, рядом партийный логотип, имя-фамилия крупным шрифтом, несколько правильн

27 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC≈4,600 viewsread 29 August 2026

#Хвалим_валим 🇷🇺 🗳️ 📺 Теперь фанаты Анастасии Павлюченковой, обрывающие её листовки отовсюду, куда дотягиваются, попали в затруднительное положение. За яркого кандидата агитируют сложные технические системы. Телевизор, на котором крутятся запоминающиеся ролики, с собой не утащишь. Придётся настиным поклонникам кататься на лифтах... Анастасию же за искромётные идеи и блестящую реализацию мы в очередной раз 👍#хвалим

27 Aug 2026, 07:03 UTC≈4,300 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

#Разгребаем_повестку 🗳️🇷🇺🤔 Насколько дорожные инциденты с авто известных политиков, вызывающие повышенный интерес у публики, могут влиять на электоральные расклады? Высказались с коллегами на эту тему в публикации на канале "Пять партий". 🗣Валерий Прохоров, заместитель директора Центра ПРИСП, член Российской ассоциации политических консультантов (РАПК), автор телеграм-канала "Телеграбля": "Само по себе обычное ДТП со

26 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC≈4,450 viewsread 29 August 2026

#Домыслы_и_смыслы 🗳️🇷🇺📆 Это же какой-то шабат шолом?

26 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC≈4,380 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

#Домыслы_и_смыслы ⛔️ 💸 🤔Активно обсуждаемая на Западе новость о том, что «эксперт предложил списать госдолг США методами шумеров», на деле является авторской колонкой в The New York Times, где журналист Пол Винья использует древний термин ama-gi как яркую метафору, а не как призыв к действию. Он исходит из того, что США и мир в целом пересекли черту, когда с текущими долгами можно справиться обычными бюджетными путям

Showing the 12 most recent of 107 posts we hold for @prokhorov11. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 39 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ФоРГО
@FoRGO_official · 48,631
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Телеграбля” (@prokhorov11), 10,493 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prokhorov11.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.