Channel
@ZZlZZI
On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
14,976subscribers
-308 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001451051113 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ZZlZZI |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ZZlZZI |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:39 | 14,976 | -22 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 07:39 | 14,998 | -21 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 11:16 | 15,019 | -16 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 23:21 | 15,035 | -22 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 01:38 | 15,057 | -24 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 04:00 | 15,081 | -32 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 22:37 | 15,113 | +7 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:18 | 15,106 | -20 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:12 | 15,126 | -10 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:35 | 15,136 | -13 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:36 | 15,149 | -10 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:14 | 15,159 | -7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:14 | 15,166 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:32 | 15,168 | +11 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:26 | 15,157 | +46 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:32 | 15,111 | -6 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:42 | 15,117 | -11 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 10:37 | 15,128 | -19 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 21:48 | 15,147 | -9 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:23 | 15,156 | first reading |
28 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 28 (23 June 2026 – 31 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,507 |
| Reactions total | 25 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 10:58 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
183 reactions across 28 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 115 | 62.8% | |
| 💔 | 21 | 11.5% | |
| 😭 | 18 | 9.84% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 8.20% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 4.92% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 2.73% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 183 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ZZlZZI. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 28 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 June 2026 to 31 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
لأنك ترى في التفاصيل الصغيرة ما لا يراه غيرك، وتمنح الأشياء من قلبك أكثر مما تمنحك، ستجد نفسك متعبًا في كثير من الأحيان. ستتأثر بكلمة عابرة، وبموقف ينساه الآخرون سريعًا، لأنك لا تعرف كيف تمر على الأشياء دون أن تترك شيئًا منك فيها. يا صديقي، لا تكن قاسيًا على قلبك؛ فالعالم قد لا ينتبه لكل ما تشعر به، لكن حساسيتك ليست عيبًا، وما تحتاجه فقط أن تتعلم كيف تحمي قلبك دون أن تفقد طيبته.
💯4❤1
أحزن على نفسي، وعلى ما تركته الأيام في قلبي من آثار لا تزول بسهولة. أشعر أحيانًا أنني تغيرت أكثر مما ينبغي، وأن الشخص الذي كنت أعرفه في داخلي لم يعد يشبهني كما كان. لم تعد الأشياء تلامسني بالطريقة نفسها، ولا صرت أفهم مشاعري كما كنت، وكأنني ابتعدت عن نفسي قليلًا حتى أصبحت غريبًا عنها.
❤4💔2
حقيقة...
😭12❤2
كيف لي أن أتجاوز كلَّ ذلك الشعور تجاهها، بعدما أخبرتني أنني لستُ سوى أفضلِ أخٍ لها؛ كيف أُقنع قلبي بأن يتراجع عن شعورٍ ترسخ في أعماقه، وأن يتقبل حقيقةً لم يكن مستعدًّا لها؟
💔12
كل يوم أشعر أن الحياة تضع على قلبي ما يفوق احتماله، وتدفعني لأن أكون شخصا لا يشبهني. أتعب من كثرة التفكير، ومن أشياء لم تحدث، وأخرى حدثت ولم أستطع تجاوزها، ومن طرق سلكتها ثم انتهت قبل أن أصل. أحيانا أشعر أنني غريب عن نفسي، عن المكان الذي أعيش فيه، وحتى عن الصورة التي أصبحت عليها، وأتساءل متى أصبحت الأيام تحتاج مني كل هذا الصبر. ومع ذلك، ما زال في داخلي قلب بسيط يحب التفاصيل الصغيرة، ويد حانية تخفف عن الآخرين ما استطا…
❤4💯1
تمعّنتُ في نفسي طويلًا، فاكتشفتُ أن أكثر ما أتعبني لم يكن ما حدث، بل ما كنتُ أصدّقه عن كل ما يحدث؛ كنتُ أرى الهاوية قبل أن أصل إليها، وأسمع صوتًا في داخلي يقنعني أن النجاة وهم، فأعود كل مرةٍ إلى النقطة ذاتها محمّلًا بخيبةٍ لم تقع بعد، حتى سئمتُ من هذا العقل الذي يحاكمني قبل أن تمنحني الحياة فرصةً لأعيش، وسئمتُ من كذبٍ داخليٍّ يتقن ارتداء هيئة الحقيقة، وكل ما أريده الآن أن يصمت هذا الضجيج قليلًا، وأن أجد في داخلي شيئً…
❤9
ستبقى أنت الرفيق الوحيد الذي لا يفارقك مهما تبدّلت الوجوه والطرق، فلا تجعل قسوة الأيام سببًا لأن تقسو على نفسك، ولا تحمل قلبك فوق احتماله، يكفي أن تمضي بما تستطيع، وتمنح نفسك شيئًا من الرحمة التي تمنحها للآخرين.
❤9👍1
الأصدقاء لا يكشفهم الوقت بقدر ما تكشفهم المواقف؛ يمرّ الكثيرون من حياتك كأنهم لم يكونوا، ويبقى القليل منهم حتى تضيق الدائرة تمامًا، فلا تجد إلى جوارك إلا من كان حضوره صادقًا منذ البداية.
🔥6❤2
في داخلي مساحةٌ لا يبلغها أحد، عزلةٌ لا تصنعها الوحدة، بل ذلك الشعور الغامض بأنك حاضرٌ بين الجميع، ولا يجد أحدٌ الطريق إليك.
❤10
قد يطول الطريق وتثقل الخطى، لكن الأرواح التي تحمل الدعاء في قلبها، والإصرار في عينيها، لا تضلّ وجهتها. سر خلف الضوء الذي يسكن داخلك،
❤2
إذا كان لك نصيب في شيء، فلن تُعجزه المسافات، ولن تمنعه العوائق، ولن تُطفئه كثرة الأبواب المغلقة. قد تتأخر الأقدار لتُعلّمك الصبر، وقد تلتف الطرق لتمنحك ما هو أصلح، لكن ما كتبه الله لك سيأتي في الوقت الذي اختاره بحكمته. لذلك اطمئن، واسعَ بقلبٍ مطمئن، فما عند الله لا يضيع، وما قُدِّر لك سيجد طريقه إليك ولو بدا للعين مستحيلًا.
❤5
“Happiness is only real when shared.” «السعادة لا تكون حقيقية إلا عندما تُشارك»… كانت هذه إحدى آخر الحكم التي كتبها كريس ماكاندلس قبل موته، بعد أن ذهب بعيدًا عن الناس، باحثًا عن السعادة في العزلة والطبيعة. وربما نركض جميعًا طويلًا خلف أشياء نظن أن السعادة تختبئ في نهايتها، نترك حاضرنا معلّقًا على موعدٍ قادم ونقول: حين أصل، سأكون بخير. ثم نصل، فنكتشف أن الطريق كان أطول من الفرح الذي انتظرناه، وأن بعض الأمنيات كانت جمي…
❤2🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @ZZlZZI. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“رصيف المتعبين” (@ZZlZZI), 14,976 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZZlZZI.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.