Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for کانال پرسش و‌ پاسخ های زئوس

Channel

کانال پرسش و‌ پاسخ های زئوس

@Zeusquestions

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,802subscribers

+11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001795357523
TypeChannel
Username@Zeusquestions
CreatedBetween 1 January 2022 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Zeusquestions

Topic

Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,7901,8081,7997 August 2026 — 1,791 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,794 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,790 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,793 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,798 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,799 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,795 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,797 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,798 subscribers7 September 2026 — 1,806 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,808 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,804 subscribers19 September 2026 — 1,802 subscribers1,8027 August 202619 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 43 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,787–1,811 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 14:011,802-2
15 Sept 2026, 12:421,804-4
12 Sept 2026, 02:391,808+2
7 Sept 2026, 13:581,806+8
2 Sept 2026, 16:081,798+1
27 Aug 2026, 19:041,797+2
24 Aug 2026, 09:591,795-4
20 Aug 2026, 15:151,799+1
17 Aug 2026, 11:461,798+5
14 Aug 2026, 09:571,793+3
11 Aug 2026, 03:121,790-4
7 Aug 2026, 18:531,794+3
7 Aug 2026, 06:451,791first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

25 reactions across 5 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1352.0%
👎520.0%
😁416.0%
👍28.00%
🍌14.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 13:08 UTC212 viewsread 7 August 2026

نه. اصلا دور از ذهن نیست. فیزیکدانها جوری در موردش صحبت میکنن که انگار این یک فضاپیمای پیشرفته است، که در آینده ساخته میشه. :)

Signed Sarvin

1 Aug 2026, 13:08 UTC209 viewsread 7 August 2026

بله و میگن المان نازی خیلی دنبالش بود که موفق نبود

Signed Sarvin

1 Aug 2026, 13:08 UTC203 viewsread 7 August 2026

از نظر فیزیک، روی کاغذ، امکان سفر در زمان وجود داره. آره. اما اینکه واقعا در عمل، بشه سفر کرد؟ فعلا که نمیشه. آینده رو نمیدونیم!

Signed Sarvin

1 Aug 2026, 13:08 UTC187 viewsread 7 August 2026

یه سوال داشتم ایا امکان سفر در زمان وجود داره یا صرفا یه چیزه تخیلی هست

Signed Sarvin

1 Aug 2026, 13:06 UTC163 viewsread 7 August 2026

خب اینها مدلهای علمی هستن. نظر خاصی ندارم. مگر اینکه نکته ی خاصی مدنظرت باشه.

Signed Sarvin

1 Aug 2026, 13:06 UTC173 viewsread 7 August 2026

بسیار خب. صرفا خواستم بدونم نظر خاصی راجع به این موارد دارید یا نه

Signed Sarvin

1 Aug 2026, 13:06 UTC158 viewsread 7 August 2026

نظرتون درباره بازگشت پوئینکاره چیست جناب زئوس. و دیگر مدل های Cyclic universe.

Signed Sarvin

1 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTC88 viewsread 7 August 2026

درود بر زئوس خردمند نظر شما راجب پاگانیسم (paganism) چیه؟

Signed Sarvin

1 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTC97 viewsread 7 August 2026

درود دوست عزیز. بنظرم آدم برای زندگی کردن، نیازی به هیچ نوع خرافاتی نداره.

Signed Sarvin

1 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTC150 viewsread 7 August 2026

اره دقیقا منظورم همینه ولی خوب بیانش نکردم

Signed Sarvin

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Zeusquestions. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

I am Zeus
@zeus110 · 23,180
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 September 2026
گوساله
@gusaleh · 27,449
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 10 September 2026
دروغ‌ها و خرافات اسلام
@islie · 21,501
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 23 September 2026
ایمان سلیمانی امیری- IMAN SOLEIMANI AMIRI
@Imansoleymaniamiri · 25,565
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“کانال پرسش و‌ پاسخ های زئوس” (@Zeusquestions), 1,802 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Zeusquestions.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.