Computer use is everywhere now, so I'd say it's worth testing Vercel's implementation too. It can be used with any harness, and having already extensively tested agent-browser, I'd confidently say it's a solid open-source product. https://x.com/ZypherHQ/status/2116429186948542813

Channel
Zypher’s Diary
@ZypherDiary
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
17,798subscribers
+1,609 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001192656715 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ZypherDiary |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 52 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ZypherDiary |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 17:04 | 17,798 | -78 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 16:17 | 17,876 | -35 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 16:06 | 17,911 | -68 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 18:19 | 17,979 | -123 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 15:04 | 18,102 | -180 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 13:19 | 18,282 | -154 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 16:46 | 18,436 | -176 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 14:07 | 18,612 | -109 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 11:29 | 18,721 | -92 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 14:14 | 18,813 | -109 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 16:16 | 18,922 | -115 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 18:16 | 19,037 | -251 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 16:19 | 19,288 | -129 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 18:08 | 19,417 | -188 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 15:56 | 19,605 | +1,536 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 15:28 | 18,069 | -595 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 15:44 | 18,664 | -479 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 12:26 | 19,143 | -19 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 10:17 | 19,162 | -10 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 12:37 | 19,172 | first reading |
Engagement
308 posts held, back to 10 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 43 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 11.5%
- avg views ÷ 17,798 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,060
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 308 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 308 (10 August 2026 – 31 October 2026) |
| Views total | 41,100 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 15:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 3m 45s
- Average length
- 45s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (5.00%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Despite this shitty market, keep building what you believe in. We're living through one of the worst economic situations imaginable, but we're making it through. Fuck all the bullshit out there, let's just take the best out of every experience. Start experimenting, there's truly so much potential out there waiting for you. Step out of your comfort zone and you'll see results, for better or worse, you'll gain some…
In just ONE WEEK, $VEIL cooked up all this: Automated buyback & burn system $57K in buybacks & burns $67K in platform & creator fees Private DCA Chrome extension I’m super bullish. Veil it! https://x.com/veilzk/status/2112963019269705827
Fable 5.5 is coming, friends. A game changer that will open up new opportunities in every field. Always dare and you will be rewarded. Remember not to buy memecoins launched by automations. Coooking for everyone.
Switched from UGC to simple shilling. Let's get this project trending on X. https://x.com/ZypherHQ/status/2111030205682766043
good opportunity for everyone! https://x.com/ZypherHQ/status/2110753962659840236
Rome wasn't built in a day. Neither was anything that truly changed the world. The greatest technological and financial infrastructures weren't recognized overnight. They were built, tested, challenged, and refined until the world could no longer ignore them. The team behind $VEIL is building toward that kind of future. Give this protocol the time it needs to mature, and we may witness a level of adoption that take…
https://x.com/ZypherHQ/status/2110548002050064490
https://x.com/zypherhq/status/2110482504188600564
The second largest $VEIL holder sold his entire bag and handed us a discount. My conviction? Stronger than ever. These moments show you who actually believes in the project and who was only here for a quick flip. Some people can’t look beyond 48 hours. I’m looking at what Veil can become. I haven’t sold a single dollar, and neither have the other top holders I’m referring to. I have no intention of selling here. We…
https://x.com/ZypherHQ/status/2110353751144005864
Be careful of anyone contacting you via DMs. I'm not here to sell you anything! I will never DM you first. Scammers are already going around using usernames similar to mine, but you can find my official accounts in this channel's bio. Stay safe!
Showing the 12 most recent of 308 posts we hold for @ZypherDiary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@ZypherDiary edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 24 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 24 August 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @ZypherDiary as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 19 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 1 September 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 26 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@ZypherDiary named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 18 August 2026 – 18 August 2026 · confirmed gone 26 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Zypher’s Diary” (@ZypherDiary), 17,798 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZypherDiary.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.