Channel
@a0x405
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
216subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001430856326 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @a0x405 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/a0x405 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 19:39 | 216 | +6 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 210 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 209 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 209 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 4 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
139 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🕊 | 64 | 46.0% | |
| 👀 | 32 | 23.0% | |
| custom 5343828297144893276 | 22 | 15.8% | |
| 🗿 | 8 | 5.76% | |
| 🌚 | 7 | 5.04% | |
| custom 5341280178947523537 | 6 | 4.32% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 139 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2025 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @a0x405. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 July 2025 to 27 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Вместе с Андреем и Иваном мы сделали игру для GMTK Game Jam 2026. Игра называется Field, она о трудностях, с которыми сталкивается крестьянская семья в России периода Гражданской войны. Поиграть и оценить можно по ссылке: a0405u.itch.io/field
🕊11
Написал две системы поиска путей для hill. На видео можно увидеть их в действии. A* используется для поиска путей жителей, его суть состоит в выборе наиболее выгодного пути на каждом шаге поиска используя эвристику (оценку расстояния до цели). Это эффективно по причине наличия у каждого жителя собственной цели. Алгоритм находит кратчайший путь от одной точки до другой, минимизируя обход игрового поля. Flowfield исп…
👀2🕊2
https://a0405u.itch.io/hill Поучаствовали в джеме с ребятами, сделали прикольную штуку, концептуально интересно, но как игра она вышла недоделанной - сейчас работаем над этим. Задумка простая - строишь домики, обороняешься от чертей с помощью мортиры. На джеме заняли 41 место. Я как обычно рисовал графику, Толя работал над кодом в LOVE2D, над музыкой работал Дима BLUNSH. Отдельное спасибо Дане 1de, что хелпанул с а…
🕊2
Наконец, после более трёх недель с начала работ над экспериментом, я могу сказать, что моя теория по крайней мере качественно подтверждена! На картинках можно видеть результат рендеринга SDF-сетки и SDF-дерева, построенного по моему методу. Разница в том, что для первого случая компьютеру требуется хранить в памяти XxYxZ значений SDF-функции в каждом вокселе сетки. Для второго же случая требуется примерно в два-три …
👀2🕊2🌚1
SDF-сетка сферы визуализированная в виде объёма и цветового разреза.
🕊5
Это или лучи Царства Божьего, пробивающиеся сквозь твердь небесную, или медиатор моего уныния. https://youtu.be/6aJnnOnHK6g
🕊2
В данный момент я занимаюсь проверкой моей теории о возможности эффективного обратного (дифференцируемого) рендеринга SDF-сеток с помощью построения SDF-дерева (или SDF-пирамиды, если быть точнее). Суть моей теории заключается в том, что рендеринг и оптимизацию SDF можно осуществлять оперируя только неполным множеством значений SDF-сетки, а именно набором множеств нулевого уровня исходной сетки и её аппроксимаций. Э…
🕊1
Экстерьер и интерьер капсулы.
👀15🕊2🌚1🗿1
Дизайн инвазивной космической капсулы.
🕊14
Слово огласительное святителя Иоанна Златоуста на Святую Пасху Кто благочестив и боголюбив, – тот пусть насладится этим прекрасным и светлым торжеством. Кто раб благоразумный, – тот пусть, радуясь, войдёт в радость Господа своего. Кто потрудился, постясь, – тот пусть возьмёт ныне динарий. Кто работал с первого часа, – тот пусть получит сегодня должную плату. Кто пришёл после третьего часа, – пусть с благодарностью п…
🌚3
Вместе с Валерой делаем игру. Обычно делает только Валера, я ничего не делаю. В этот раз тоже, но немножечко сделал, как обычно. Реализовал систему лазания основанную на методе Barycentric Triangle Walking. Этот метод позволяет прикрепляться к любым геометрическим объектам, а именно к их треугольным сеткам, и перемещаться по поверхности объекта ориентируясь на барицентрические координаты. Такие координаты позволяют …
🕊11👀6🗿1
Что ж, могу констатировать следующее: заявления о том, что мой сервер никогда не будет заблокирован, оказались ложными. Сегодня я ощутил на себе, как работают так называемые "белые списки". Естественно, моего сервера в этих списках нет, поэтому доступ к нему получить в такой ситуации невозможно. Также как и ко многим другим серверам и веб-страницам обычных людей, малого бизнеса, и просто бизнеса, которому не посчастл…
🕊1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @a0x405. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“0x405” (@a0x405), 216 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/a0x405.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.