Learnings from Sep'26 Attempt Must Watch For Jan'27 & Onwards😊🙌 https://youtu.be/KyJDIcidUBU
❤🔥23❤19💋6🙈5🙏1

Channel
@aakashkandoicainter
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
83,237subscribers
+4,951 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002224090992 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aakashkandoicainter |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aakashkandoicainter |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
41,300 average views per post against 83,237 subscribers — an engagement rate of 49.6%. Across the 3,668 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,635–99,947 subscribers, posting mainly in English — the middle half sit between 1.72% and 11.0%, with a median of 5.09%.
| Window | 30 days (25 August 2026 – 24 September 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 12 of 12 published in the window (0 exact, 12 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 495,730 |
| Mature posts only | 49.6% over 12 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 83,237 measured 18 September 2026 |
| Cohort | b31623:eng · 3,668 channels · p10 0.397% · p25 1.72% · p50 5.09% · p75 11.0% · p90 21.6% |
| Position in cohort | 99.100th percentile · 9.8× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.019% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | English · 100.0% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 24 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 06:15 | 83,237 | +168 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 00:37 | 83,069 | +118 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 10:37 | 82,951 | +55 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 23:16 | 82,896 | +93 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 01:39 | 82,803 | +52 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 00:21 | 82,751 | -21 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 11:01 | 82,772 | +44 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:47 | 82,728 | +140 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:57 | 82,588 | +512 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:53 | 82,076 | +396 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:44 | 81,680 | +296 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:12 | 81,384 | +210 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:28 | 81,174 | +454 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:25 | 80,720 | +343 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 09:38 | 80,377 | +215 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 07:38 | 80,162 | +171 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 04:56 | 79,991 | +157 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 14:58 | 79,834 | +145 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 07:04 | 79,689 | +70 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 05:11 | 79,619 | first reading |
33 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 99 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 33 (18 July 2026 – 21 September 2026) |
| Views total | 499,700 |
| Reactions total | 7,583 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Sept 2026, 11:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
16,399 reactions across 33 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 13,390 | 81.7% | |
| 💋 | 894 | 5.45% | |
| 🙏 | 476 | 2.90% | |
| 🔥 | 438 | 2.67% | |
| 👍 | 187 | 1.14% | |
| 💯 | 152 | 0.927% | |
| 🫡 | 134 | 0.817% | |
| ❤🔥 | 111 | 0.677% | |
| 🥰 | 111 | 0.677% | |
| 🗿 | 57 | 0.348% | |
| 🍾 | 51 | 0.311% | |
| 😘 | 47 | 0.287% | |
| 👏 | 37 | 0.226% | |
| 🏆 | 36 | 0.22% | |
| 🤔 | 29 | 0.177% | |
| ⚡ | 27 | 0.165% | |
| 😢 | 25 | 0.152% | |
| 😨 | 23 | 0.14% | |
| 🤪 | 22 | 0.134% | |
| 🤗 | 19 | 0.116% | |
| 13 further kinds | 133 | 0.811% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16,399 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Learnings from Sep'26 Attempt Must Watch For Jan'27 & Onwards😊🙌 https://youtu.be/KyJDIcidUBU
❤🔥23❤19💋6🙈5🙏1
https://youtu.be/dnwCbKFBx_w?si=gmuIyOAQG3SHgVIW
❤145👍7💋6💯3❤🔥2🏆2🔥2🥰2
Today is Teachers Day. But my students taught me more than I ever taught them. You made me better. Every single day. A teacher is nothing without his students. And I mean that🙏🏻 Love You all 😊❤️ AK Hai Bhaisaahab 😎
❤2,250💋179🙏63🥰31❤🔥29😘13🙈11🔥9
Kasa Kaaaay?? Aajao let’s meet @ 6:30 PM for the last day overnight marathon 🔥 Finish GST before you sleep - Milte hai 🫡 https://www.youtube.com/live/9Bv4NAoQjco?is=d5PG63Xcra5ByBDN
❤165👍20🤪10💋3😨3🙏2
https://www.youtube.com/live/bK03GsCs4KE?si=3fr5FX07e51ci4LC Telegram Channel - https://t.me/ca_cs_karan17 CA Inter Law - THE GAME CHANGER MARATHON! 4 Hours • 40 Marks • 4 High-Weightage Chapters Don’t miss this marathon. Attend LIVE and give your Law preparation the final push! #LawWithKK
❤80💋11🏆4😢3🙏2😁1
https://youtu.be/Gk9pK4gN0Fs?si=QWgT6N3-XhG-nPcV
❤69🗿10🙏6💋5🔥2
How was Today’s Accounts Paper?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤264💋56🍾35👍23🤪12😘12🤔8😱8
Hello Everyone, Best of luck for Your CA Exams Tension mat lena kisi chiz ka Just give your best Full Paper attempt karne ka try karna If you see a new / tricky ques - Always remember we don't want 100 out of 100 Our Focus area should be the ques which we know Baaki aapne jo bhi padha hai woh sab yaad aayega buss bharosa rakhna apne upar Stay Calm jaisa bhi situation ho😊 Love You All ❤️ Best of Luck Again❤️😊 #…
❤2,370🙏124💋64👍27🔥13🥰11⚡9😘8
Last Minute Tips to Score 80+ in Adv Accounts | CA Inter Sep'26 Exams https://youtu.be/lPGfCbM9Usg
❤260💋35👍8🙏8🫡6🔥4🥰4🤗3
A Very Important Video for all Students ❤️ In this Video I Have Discussed: - How to Attempt Full 100 Marks in 3 Hours - How to Utilise 15 Mins Reading Time - Sequence of Attempting Ques - When to Attempt MCQs etc. Video Link: https://youtu.be/otHZJGOOAMQ
❤306💋53🙏12💯8👍7❤🔥6🔥5👏4
All Important Links for Sep 26 Exams: Adv Accounts 5 Days Revision Planner: https://t.me/aakashkandoicainter/672 Revision Lectures Playlist: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLm8RLlq6Pj_nO-nvlmFjZgcOn_Jb9-t5F&si=hy6OlEEvofea3AmN AS Marathon (15 Topics): https://www.youtube.com/live/F77NXKLwHec?si=lXxGLG49g7tZ8XjT LDR Ques List: https://t.me/aakashkandoicainter/585 May 26 RTP Video: https://youtu.be/Hjy6Vz2X…
❤359🙏23💋21❤🔥16🍾12🥰8👻6😁2
Most Important Tips for Last Few Days Prep | CA Inter Sep'26 Exams | CA Aakash Kandoi https://youtu.be/S4omC0f7Aek
❤75🔥5💋4👍1😱1
Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @aakashkandoicainter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
How was Today’s Accounts Paper?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 21 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CA Inter with Aakash Kandoi😎” (@aakashkandoicainter), 83,237 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aakashkandoicainter.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.