Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CostFin by CA Ganesh Bharadwaj

Channel

CostFin by CA Ganesh Bharadwaj

@costfin

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,170subscribers

+312 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001898897720
TypeChannel
Username@costfin
DescriptionThis channel is your one-stop destination for all your Costing & FM preparation for CA & CMA courses. Join our community of like-minded students and embark on a journey of conceptual learning.
CreatedBetween 1 November 2022 and 31 August 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded19 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held21
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/costfin

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,8588,1708,01419 August 2026 — 7,858 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,862 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,870 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,875 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,868 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,882 subscribers5 September 2026 — 7,927 subscribers10 September 2026 — 7,989 subscribers13 September 2026 — 8,010 subscribers17 September 2026 — 8,026 subscribers27 September 2026 — 8,051 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,092 subscribers12 October 2026 — 8,091 subscribers15 October 2026 — 8,099 subscribers18 October 2026 — 8,098 subscribers21 October 2026 — 8,123 subscribers24 October 2026 — 8,149 subscribers27 October 2026 — 8,164 subscribers29 October 2026 — 8,167 subscribers1 November 2026 — 8,165 subscribers4 November 2026 — 8,170 subscribers19 August 20264 November 2026
21 measurements spanning 78 days, net +312. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,811–8,217 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 21:278,170+5
1 Nov 2026, 21:458,165-2
29 Oct 2026, 23:418,167+3
27 Oct 2026, 02:098,164+15
24 Oct 2026, 07:308,149+26
21 Oct 2026, 17:518,123+25
18 Oct 2026, 08:048,098-1
15 Oct 2026, 15:118,099+8
12 Oct 2026, 06:218,091-1
5 Oct 2026, 10:228,092+41
27 Sept 2026, 02:378,051+25
17 Sept 2026, 22:398,026+16
13 Sept 2026, 22:418,010+21
10 Sept 2026, 15:197,989+62
5 Sept 2026, 16:377,927+45
1 Sept 2026, 17:427,882+14
29 Aug 2026, 07:447,868-7
26 Aug 2026, 08:557,875+5
23 Aug 2026, 08:367,870+8
19 Aug 2026, 13:547,862first reading

Engagement

34 posts held, back to 17 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.7%
avg views ÷ 8,170 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,260
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.307%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 34 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held34 (17 January 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total24,863
Reactions total71
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 11:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
102
Videos
6
Links
164

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

640 reactions across 32 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤49577.3%
👍528.13%
🙏457.03%
🤯162.50%
🔥142.19%
❤‍🔥40.625%
🕊30.469%
🤗30.469%
💯20.313%
🤣20.313%
🫡20.313%
🤝10.156%
🥰10.156%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 640 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 17 January 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 11 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

3 Nov 2026, 06:07 UTC772 views1 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DfRGXZDuXYa/?mdxt=MTUzMzY2cmZmN2I3

❤1

2 Nov 2026, 11:39 UTC961 views2 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

https://youtu.be/ZxzGtEPJXoU?si=781r0VwpMvorQ003

❤2

1 Nov 2026, 05:18 UTC≈1,160 views4 reactionsread 6 November 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/f393VmgXpg0?si=83sSWVhWKQ89GYeH

❤4

29 Oct 2026, 15:09 UTC≈1,720 viewsread 6 November 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/cI83e7f4VE0?si=tUGeuPoMXZbWWqa5

29 Oct 2026, 15:09 UTC≈1,610 views2 reactionsread 6 November 2026

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DfFQyF5OxYn/?dlrf=M2o0ZjN6aTB4cnNm

❤2

27 Oct 2026, 13:07 UTC≈1,950 views1 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

https://youtu.be/oUlMhhZOvWY?si=ig2WJ2a1BSg2bX_-

👍1

22 Oct 2026, 04:03 UTC≈2,970 views1 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

https://youtu.be/3d1L0n7ojys?si=xRaPCg_jutyZDUPh

👍1

21 Oct 2026, 04:12 UTC≈3,030 views2 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

https://youtu.be/lVNCc80G-Xs?si=W0rWkPtzQrg80x8_

👍2

20 Oct 2026, 16:34 UTC≈2,910 views4 reactionsread 6 November 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

❤3👍1

13 Oct 2026, 10:48 UTC≈3,960 views9 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

👍9

13 Oct 2026, 10:48 UTC≈3,820 views45 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Guys! Beware 🛑 Someone has created a fake channel with my name and image and are providing stock tips and collecting money. Pls do not believe this as it's a scam. I have reported them and request you to also do the same. This is a clear case of impersonation and fraud. Please protect yourself and share this with as many people as possible so that everyone can stay safe from these people. Love, CA Ganesh Bharadwaj

👍33❤5🤯5🤣2

18 Sept 2026, 17:34 UTC≈4,750 views13 reactionsread 6 November 2026

📢 Important App Update for CostFin Students Hey Folks! Our CostFin App has recently been updated with several new features and enhancements to improve your learning experience. 🚀 📲 *Mandatory Update:* If you have not received the mandatory update, you can manually update the app using the link below: 🔗 *Update App:* https://www.techhand.in/applinks/bn2 If you still face any issue after updating the app, please c…

❤13

Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @costfin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

FeelFreetoLearn_Official
@FeelFreetoLearn_Official · 24,334
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 15 September 2026
CA Inter with Aakash Kandoi😎
@aakashkandoicainter · 86,236
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 19 August 2026
CA CS Karthik Manikonda
@ManikondaKarthik · 36,134
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CostFin by CA Ganesh Bharadwaj” (@costfin), 8,170 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/costfin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.