Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Анна Берсенева, писатель

Channel

Анна Берсенева, писатель

@aberseneva

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,561subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001065808340
TypeChannel
Username@aberseneva
Created9 July 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/aberseneva

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,5611,5691,5656 August 2026 — 1,567 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,567 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,566 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,563 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,569 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,567 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,565 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,563 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,562 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,564 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,565 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,562 subscribers17 September 2026 — 1,561 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 42 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,560–1,570 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 02:571,561-1
13 Sept 2026, 03:371,562-3
3 Sept 2026, 21:371,565+1
28 Aug 2026, 02:571,564+2
25 Aug 2026, 06:431,562-1
22 Aug 2026, 01:181,563-2
18 Aug 2026, 23:421,565-2
16 Aug 2026, 07:121,567-2
12 Aug 2026, 19:331,569+6
9 Aug 2026, 18:111,563-3
7 Aug 2026, 00:001,566-1
6 Aug 2026, 11:351,567no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:451,567first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 26 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

336 reactions across 26 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😢12537.2%
10832.1%
👍7823.2%
👎257.44%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 336 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC111 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Мародеры. https://t.me/dwglavnoe/67313

😢9👎1

7 Aug 2026, 12:16 UTC145 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Остается только горько улыбнуться над игрушкой Рootin. https://t.me/moscowtimes_opinion/11895

👍1

7 Aug 2026, 08:52 UTC164 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Пушкинист и литературоведы в штатском. https://t.me/radiosvoboda/102195

👍3😢2

6 Aug 2026, 23:05 UTC218 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

«Берлинские соломинки» в США. https://virgolapress.com/product/20260805/

13👍1

6 Aug 2026, 21:26 UTC252 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Из фейсбука москвича: «Признаться, я надеялся уже никогда в жизни этого не увидеть. Но - не будь наивен. Вот эта очередь к мощам человека, сыгравшего такую жуткую роль в истории страны, после всего, что сегодня известно о его людоедских взглядах, не просто поражает, а угнетает. Наверное, в ней немало просто любопытных, но всё же. И ведь стоят в ней в основном люди, которым, в отличие от моих ровесников, в школе не в

😢10👍42👎1

6 Aug 2026, 18:36 UTC258 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

По трейлеру понятно, что шедевр. Но, кстати, не понятно, с чего вдруг такой игнор. На аналогичное три богатыря прекрасно ходили. https://t.me/ogomoscow/14064

👍71

6 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC267 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

А ведь действительно ни один путинолюб не может реалистично ответить на этот вопрос. https://t.me/baryakinaru/3728

😢10👎2

6 Aug 2026, 09:08 UTC254 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сандармох - это, как и Катынь, кость в горле путинского государства и населения, поддерживающего это государство. Это такое прямое и неопровержимое свидетельство преступления этого государства против человечности, от которого гэбэшная банда просто корчится, как на раскаленной сковородке. Они отправили в тюрьму историка Юрия Дмитриева, нашедшего и изучившего свидетельства их преступления, и задействовали всех своих аг

😢15👎1

5 Aug 2026, 22:07 UTC254 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

МОЯ ЛИТЕРАТУРНАЯ ПРЕМИЯ ПО СРЕДАМ № 365 НА КУХОННЫХ ДОЩЕЧКАХ ИСТОРИИ В Книжном клубе Бориса Акунина МОЯ ЛИТЕРАТУРНАЯ ПРЕМИЯ. СИМА ВАСИЛЬЕВА — BAbook В Российском Антивоенном Журнале (РАЖ) https://ragh2023.com/%e2%84%96-365/

6👎1

5 Aug 2026, 20:55 UTC255 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Экономика «Анны Карениной». https://t.me/bookswithklishin/934

👍6

5 Aug 2026, 20:47 UTC256 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Правильные выводы и правильные навыки. https://t.me/mayofis/5637

14👎1

5 Aug 2026, 09:55 UTC278 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Логичное развитие событий. https://t.me/faust_patronum/161

👍3😢2👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @aberseneva. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Анна Берсенева, писатель” (@aberseneva), 1,561 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aberseneva.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.