بیخیال، یعنی تو شب سرت رو روی بالشت میذاری با خودت فکر نمیکنی این چه رفتارهایی بود با آدمی که انقدر لطیف و صادقانه و کودکانه دوستت داشت، کردی؟

Channel
ابرکِ اُمـید☁
@abrak_tweet
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,797subscribers
+33 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001486686245 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @abrak_tweet |
| Description | 「𝐧𝐞𝐩𝐡𝐨𝐩𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐞 ☁」 از روزنه اُمید گلوله ایِ به جنس رویآ به مَـغزم شلیک شد .. 🪐🌱 . . . ورود به دنیای رویا و امید☁️ 𝙄𝙣𝙛𝙤 ➯ @info_dreem |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/abrak_tweet |
Topic
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 20:01 | 7,797 | -4 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 03:15 | 7,801 | +7 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 11:01 | 7,794 | +2 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 07:57 | 7,792 | -11 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 15:40 | 7,803 | -5 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 22:56 | 7,808 | -4 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 09:09 | 7,812 | +1 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 20:15 | 7,811 | -4 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 11:44 | 7,815 | +10 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 05:38 | 7,805 | -6 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 02:19 | 7,811 | -35 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 02:16 | 7,846 | +5 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 23:00 | 7,841 | -5 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 03:58 | 7,846 | +2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 13:35 | 7,844 | +15 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 02:17 | 7,829 | +25 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 16:25 | 7,804 | -5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:56 | 7,809 | +8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:13 | 7,801 | +16 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 7,785 | first reading |
Engagement
100 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 13.4%
- avg views ÷ 7,797 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,040
- 34 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.40%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 34
- of 100 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 31 of 34 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 100 (26 July 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 35,495 |
| Reactions total | 466 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 01:11 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 732
- Videos
- 506
- Links
- 639
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 44s
- Average length
- 22s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,507 reactions across 92 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 655 | 43.5% | |
| 💔 | 375 | 24.9% | |
| 😢 | 78 | 5.18% | |
| 💘 | 71 | 4.71% | |
| 🕊 | 63 | 4.18% | |
| ❤🔥 | 57 | 3.78% | |
| 🍓 | 46 | 3.05% | |
| 👏 | 35 | 2.32% | |
| 👌 | 31 | 2.06% | |
| 🌚 | 25 | 1.66% | |
| 🤗 | 17 | 1.13% | |
| 🥰 | 16 | 1.06% | |
| 👀 | 14 | 0.929% | |
| 😇 | 10 | 0.664% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 0.464% | |
| 🐳 | 4 | 0.265% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 0.199% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 96 of the 100 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,535 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 100 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 34 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
اگه ترسیدی، خسته شدی، استرس داری، گم شدی، نمیدونی داری چیکار میکنی؛ میخوام بهت بگم باورکن همه همینیم، هیچکی نمیدونه داره چیکار میکنه. همه داریم با آزمون و خطا زندگی میکنیم. عیبی هم نداره. فوقش خراب میکنی. فدای سرت. کی به کیه. بذار اصن گند بزنی. چی میشه مگه؟ بهت قول میدم؛ هیچی.
❤2🍓2
ولی این هوای بارونی واقعا مناسبِ کسی که پارتنر نداره نیست.
اسم این بیکلام ترکیب بارون و پیانو و ویالون شکستگی قلبه. این بیکلام افرادی که قلبشون شکسته رو بغل میکنه و بهشون کل وایب خوب و آرامش و رهایی میده.🫂 @dream_liffee
❤🔥2🌚2
هر چی میخوای بگو؛ حیوونا به سمتم میان، بچهها بهم لبخند میزنن، غریبهها داستان زندگیشون رو برام تعریف میکنن، آدما کنارم احساس امنیت میکنن، انرژی هیچوقت دروغ نمیگه.
❤14
آدم باید یکیو داشته باشه که خودشو بخاطرش جمع و جور کنه، یه کاراییو انجام نده، یه اخلاقایی رو ترک کنه، انگیزه برای پیشرفت پیدا کنه، خودشو دوست داشته باشه و به زندگی جدیتر نگاه کنه.
❤8
💘
❤4
آقا من واقعا آدم خوب و مهربونیام، ولی نمیدونم چرا انقدر دارم اذیت میشم.
💔10❤7
دیگه آدم مورد علاقهم نیستی. شدی خاطره مورد علاقهم.
❤9
دلم با رفتن نبود اما چاره دیگهای نداشتم.
من ذاتا شروعکننده خوبی نیستم؛ تو هر زمینهای که فکرشو میکنم من آغازگر نبودم. نه تو عشق، نه همکاری، نه دشمنی، نه دوستی، نه آشتی، نه خیانت و نه ... ولی اگه تو هر مورد، تُو شروعکننده باشی، من تو ادامه دادنش، برات سنگ تموم میذارم عزیزم ❤️
❤17
مرا اتفاقی پیر کرد که هرگز رخ نداد.
💔17
Showing the 12 most recent of 100 posts we hold for @abrak_tweet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 7 posts on @abrak_tweet as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 10 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 25 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 4 days
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 86 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@subliminal_radan · 10,44932 posts🖤*¨*•.¸Missing heart¸.•*¨*🖤
@DELTANGIM_B · 33,82928 postsپروکسی پرسرعت
@proxyporsoat · 34,70928 posts𝗔𝗿𝗮𝘇 𝗘𝗻𝗴𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗵
@Araz_English · 17,72425 posts• iNteRvaAl •💫
@iNteRvaAl · 19,51425 postsکدکیهانی
@KoOdkEYHani888 · 21,78225 postsصدای پای آبツ🌊🌊
@sedayepayeaaaab · 12,88125 postsتولدم مبارک 🔴 تولـــــــدت مــبــــارک
@tavalodtavalod99 · 29,24325 postsکلیپ اینستاگرام( تُ عشقمی )
@to_eshghami · 25,13325 posts❤ دلــــ♡ــتـنـگــ♡ــی ❤
@deeeltangam · 25,53424 postsࡅߺ߳ܭࡄࡅߺ߳ࡉ🖤
@Teext_post · 22,43924 posts•|نَـبـــا࣫͝ ❁|•
@nabatnevis · 18,47523 postsاستوریجات...🦊
@sttoryiinstaa · 11,47422 postsریسمون سیاه ◌
@RisMonSiyaH · 12,31920 posts‹سرزمین اُمیــدواری🌱🤍›
@Magic_OF_Hope · 11,71819 postsمآنارِم؛
@patoghe_mon · 9,73018 postsعکس های شیک
@akshay_naab · 11,71717 postsAraz Turkçe 🇹🇷
@ArazTurkish · 10,49617 postsهوش مصنوعی | tecno
@instageram_star · 8,01217 postsسرای شعر
@onlyshear · 9,56717 postsخانوم خونه|𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐚🍓
@khanedari_org · 9,03216 postsنوشته های ناب و عاشقانه
@nevshtehay_nab · 11,24016 posts𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝒚𝒐𝒖🫀
@MOTIVATIONAL78 · 8,02015 postsopen minded
@paradoooo · 10,55215 posts
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@hihopefully · 20,667
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 26 September 2026
@Cpti0n · 18,750
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 5 October 2026
@aaso_channel · 19,461
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 1 October 2026
@sabzbemannn · 31,247
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 8 September 2026
@CafeStoory · 24,527
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 25 September 2026
@iErota1 · 22,188
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 September 2026
@yalitilmiss · 106,238
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 15 August 2026
@Teext_post · 22,439
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 September 2026
@marinaachannel · 28,199
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 9 September 2026
@fale_rooz_ost · 105,218
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 1 September 2026
@arome_Delam · 49,609
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 28 August 2026
@iNteRvaAl · 19,514
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 1 October 2026
@dozham98 · 27,463
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 September 2026
@sun_flowerr7 · 19,394
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 1 October 2026
@dosti_khoda · 42,357
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 29 August 2026
@shinevis · 32,706
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 5 September 2026
@Girly_Royal · 45,207
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 3 September 2026
@RAMONA_HE · 25,931
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 13 September 2026
@DEL_ANGIZ_JAN · 21,138
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 25 September 2026
@PDFbo0ok · 116,457
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 August 2026
@khatzendgii · 32,920
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 6 September 2026
@angizeshi75 · 120,261
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ابرکِ اُمـید☁” (@abrak_tweet), 7,797 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/abrak_tweet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.