Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ahror

Channel

Ahror

@acceptthyself

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

61,955subscribers

+3,370 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002017090467
TypeChannel
Username@acceptthyself
DescriptionAll opinions are my own, credit to authors is given when their words are shared here. acceptthyself.com
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live20 October 2026
Measurements held44
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 20 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/acceptthyself

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

58,21761,95560,0867 August 2026 — 58,585 subscribers7 August 2026 — 58,585 subscribers8 August 2026 — 58,591 subscribers9 August 2026 — 58,613 subscribers10 August 2026 — 58,638 subscribers11 August 2026 — 58,693 subscribers12 August 2026 — 58,720 subscribers13 August 2026 — 58,733 subscribers14 August 2026 — 58,863 subscribers16 August 2026 — 58,965 subscribers17 August 2026 — 59,019 subscribers18 August 2026 — 59,053 subscribers19 August 2026 — 59,072 subscribers20 August 2026 — 59,122 subscribers21 August 2026 — 59,195 subscribers23 August 2026 — 59,261 subscribers24 August 2026 — 59,344 subscribers25 August 2026 — 59,435 subscribers26 August 2026 — 59,472 subscribers27 August 2026 — 59,495 subscribers28 August 2026 — 59,574 subscribers29 August 2026 — 59,592 subscribers30 August 2026 — 59,610 subscribers31 August 2026 — 59,684 subscribers1 September 2026 — 59,731 subscribers2 September 2026 — 59,773 subscribers4 September 2026 — 59,813 subscribers6 September 2026 — 59,085 subscribers10 September 2026 — 58,639 subscribers12 September 2026 — 58,444 subscribers13 September 2026 — 58,388 subscribers15 September 2026 — 58,408 subscribers17 September 2026 — 58,217 subscribers27 September 2026 — 58,403 subscribers4 October 2026 — 59,608 subscribers9 October 2026 — 60,163 subscribers13 October 2026 — 60,718 subscribers14 October 2026 — 60,936 subscribers15 October 2026 — 61,141 subscribers16 October 2026 — 61,372 subscribers17 October 2026 — 61,586 subscribers18 October 2026 — 61,709 subscribers19 October 2026 — 61,765 subscribers20 October 2026 — 61,955 subscribers7 August 202620 October 2026
44 measurements spanning 74 days, net +3,370. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 57,656–62,516 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 44
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
20 Oct 2026, 18:4961,955+190
19 Oct 2026, 21:4861,765+56
18 Oct 2026, 21:5561,709+123
17 Oct 2026, 18:5661,586+214
16 Oct 2026, 21:3861,372+231
15 Oct 2026, 18:4861,141+205
14 Oct 2026, 19:5760,936+218
13 Oct 2026, 10:0660,718+555
9 Oct 2026, 06:5560,163+555
4 Oct 2026, 21:5959,608+1,205
27 Sept 2026, 14:3658,403+186
17 Sept 2026, 17:1958,217-191
15 Sept 2026, 13:3758,408+20
13 Sept 2026, 20:0058,388-56
12 Sept 2026, 04:4058,444-195
10 Sept 2026, 00:5758,639-446
6 Sept 2026, 15:2059,085-728
4 Sept 2026, 04:3759,813+40
2 Sept 2026, 14:3959,773+42
1 Sept 2026, 13:5459,731first reading

Engagement

42 posts held, back to 13 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 150 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.6%
avg views ÷ 61,955 subscribers
Avg views / post
14,000
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.733%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 42 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 October 2026
Posts held42 (13 April 2026 – 18 October 2026)
Views total182,350
Reactions total1,336
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Oct 2026, 20:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
103
Links
31

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

6,024 reactions across 42 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,74645.6%
🤣1,02817.1%
😁5068.40%
🕊3435.69%
🔥2874.76%
💯2684.45%
✍2313.83%
👍1452.41%
🤩1422.36%
😢1141.89%
🤯1031.71%
👀831.38%
🤔280.465%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,024 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2026 to 18 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
21
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 42 we hold a reading for · 24%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @acceptthyself. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 42 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 April 2026 to 18 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

18 Oct 2026, 12:47 UTC≈4,650 views68 reactionsread 20 October 2026
Voice message

You can't connect the dots looking forward, you can only connect them looking backwards. You have to trust that the dots will somehow connect in your future. You have to trust in something, your gut, destiny, life, karma, whatever. Because believing that the dots will connect down the road would give you the confidence to follow your heart even when it leads you off the well-worn path. You've got to find what you lov…

❤44✍12💯6👍3🔥2👀1

13 Oct 2026, 16:29 UTC≈10,400 views117 reactionsread 20 October 2026
Photo

What a year! (one of the best ones ever since 2019) @acceptthyself

😁84❤18💯12🕊3

9 Oct 2026, 16:53 UTC≈14,100 views92 reactionsread 20 October 2026

If you can't spot the difference between a human-written content and an AI(SI) one, then you are NGMI. Not going to write a boasting post about how good I became at noticing it, the produced outputs simply have that uncanny valley vibes in them to the point that are hard to not notice and at the same time inexplicable. Europe is notorious for regulation, yet what they did with watermarking outputs of LLMs is a good t…

❤60✍10👍10🔥8💯2🕊2

5 Oct 2026, 14:24 UTC≈17,200 views168 reactions2 Starsread 20 October 2026
Photo

Bureaucracy after bureaucracy and finally this (completed in July, received it today), now it's officially official by the state law) @acceptthyself

🤩97❤38🔥22👍9🕊2

3 Oct 2026, 10:00 UTC≈16,700 views167 reactionsread 20 October 2026

This lady from spotify keeps telling me to tap some banner)) @acceptthyself

🤣131❤16😁15💯5

1 Oct 2026, 15:03 UTC≈16,800 views84 reactionsread 20 October 2026

"You are much too exacting and hungry for this simple, easy-going and easily contented world of today. You have a dimension too many. Whoever wants to live and enjoy his life to-day must not be like you and me. Whoever wants music instead of noise, joy instead of pleasure, soul instead of gold, creative work instead of business, passion instead of foolery, finds no home in this trivial world of ours—” - Hermine f…

❤55✍10💯8🕊7🔥3👍1

28 Sept 2026, 09:42 UTC≈18,300 views111 reactionsread 20 October 2026
Photo

IELTS result itself and a few factors to mention from my end: 1. Reading was not supposed to be a 7.0 here because it was the only skill I finished with the confidence of getting at least an 8.0, which would have made the overall score an 8.0 as well. Retaking exists, I know, and it is so tempting for me to do so, which is what IDP wants here at the same time. I am not blaming them here, but my next attempt will def…

❤68🔥20✍11👍7🤩3😁2

28 Sept 2026, 07:42 UTC≈13,100 views40 reactionsread 20 October 2026
Poll

My results are finally out)

  1. 6.510%
  2. 7.016%
  3. 7.525%
  4. 8.026%
  5. 8.513%
  6. 9.09%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥19👀12❤9

27 Sept 2026, 15:21 UTC≈13,500 views127 reactions3 Starsread 20 October 2026

Two things I have learned in life: 1. Everything a child says and does is an iteration of the same question: "Am I loved? Am I *really* loved?" 2. Nobody ever grows up. - Berto @acceptthyself

❤88💯20✍14👍3🔥1😢1

25 Sept 2026, 13:22 UTC≈13,900 views131 reactionsread 20 October 2026

Exited from the exam. It genuinely feels like I am going to get 6.5 or even 6.0 and flop this bad. My English has degraded over the past 4 years apparently. Also tell me what kind of moron writes 281 words for Task 1 alone instead of focusing more on Task 2 (300+)? @acceptthyself

🤣69😢26❤20😁9🔥5🕊2

22 Sept 2026, 17:13 UTC≈15,400 views102 reactionsread 20 October 2026
Photo

>be me >sign up on chess.com and lichess.org >play 1 rated game on each >fluke a win on pure vibes and illegible moves >provisional rating jumps straight to 1680+ >close tabs immediately >never touch chess again >retired undefeated >Grandmaster with 100% winrate @acceptthyself

🤣75❤12😁6👀4🔥3💯2

21 Sept 2026, 11:12 UTC≈13,500 views72 reactionsread 20 October 2026

Any super-duper way to learn sign language under 10 minutes? How do I explain this seller that I need to buy that specific product?

😁34🤣23❤10👀4😢1

Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @acceptthyself. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@acceptthyself edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
23 September 2026
Most recent edit
23 September 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Sept 2026, 07:42 UTCFinal Results1,150 voters approx.

My results are finally out)

  1. 6.510%
  2. 7.016%
  3. 7.525%
  4. 8.026%
  5. 8.513%
  6. 9.09%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2026 to 18 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Maths in You
@mathsinyou · 749 (as read 29 August 2026)
#1
CRACK NEET/JEE 2024
@crackneetjee · 1,268
#2
Ulug'bek Umidjonov
@ulugbekumidjonov · 10,677
#3
Sinamor
@ssinamorr · 5,087
#4
Funny Memes & Sarcasm
@Funny_Memes_Sarcasm · 39,932
#5
Valera Notes
@valeranotes · 7,618
#6
GMAT Wallah by PW
@gmatwallah · 5,257
#7
ТЎЛҚИН ОФЙ ЁШЛАРИ РАСМИЙ КАНАЛИ
@tolqinyoshlari · 142
#8
bohemian
@inbohemia · 4,339
#9
IISERs || IAT'27 | NEST |PREP4IISER
@Akshay_IISERB · 1,154
#10
FALSAFA FANIDAN KUNDUZGI DARS MATERIALLARI
@falsafa_2209 · 53
#11
Booktrovert📚
@booktrovert_world · 380 (as read 29 August 2026)
#12
Grammarway2 😎
@grammarway2_2 · 2,235
#13
ACTIVATE AUDIO PROVIDER
@activate_audio · 681
#14
CHDPU | Turizm fakulteti rasmiy kanali
@turizm_rasmiy_kanal · 1,385
#15
Dialogues and Lectures
@dialogues_lectures_9 · 1,126
#16
alight motion xml | Авто
@L1mb000000 · 1,507
#17
ECAMPUZ
@PROJECT_ECAMPUZ · 281
#18
.
@shamchiroooq · 4
#19
Self-Study
@Selfstudymaterials · 475 (as read 29 August 2026)
#20
Tarixçilik
@tarixchilik_uz · 4,681
#21
Anvarov’s blog
@anvarovsblog · 41,102
#22
Guccigo: where technology makes sense!
@gucigo · 2,297
#23
Anime Tik Tok
@anime_tik_tok_videos · 1,168
#24
SPAYK_YT brawl stars meme
@spayk_yt1 · 306
#25
Physics And Mathematics
@PhysicsAndMathematics5 · 2,367
#26
Hot english آموزش زبان مجله آموزشی زبان انگلیسی تنها مرجع مجله هات انگلیش تبلیغات تماس با ادمین
@learnhotenglish · 1,492
#27
IELTS Writing Task 2
@IELTSwriting_task2 · 1,553
#28
JDPU (Sayiljoy) AL (rasmiy)
@JDPUsayiljoyi · 1,396
#29
EDITING MATERIALS
@clips_for_editing · 3,188
#30
Yuldoshev's Blog
@YuldoshevG · 5,420
#31
Bobirjon's Blog | IELTS 9 | SAT 1600
@BobirjonsThoughts · 15,641
#32
KUNDUZIY
@kunduziy · 16,996
#33
uktamova
@uktamovaposts · 2,765
#34

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Funny Memes & Sarcasm
@Funny_Memes_Sarcasm · 39,932
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ahror” (@acceptthyself), 61,955 subscribers as measured 20 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/acceptthyself.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.