Channel
@gucigo
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,297subscribers
-136 since we began measuring on 29 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001203302827 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gucigo |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 29 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gucigo |
Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Oct 2026, 11:56 | 2,297 | -3 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 20:55 | 2,300 | -2 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 18:51 | 2,302 | -11 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 10:35 | 2,313 | -12 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 19:39 | 2,325 | -25 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 15:59 | 2,350 | -21 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:58 | 2,371 | -21 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:00 | 2,392 | -20 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 10:59 | 2,412 | -11 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:48 | 2,423 | -14 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 2,437 | +4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 2,433 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 6 May 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
41 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 21 | 51.2% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 43.9% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 4.88% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2024 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Guccigo: where technology makes sense! pinned «🚨 🎁 50 FREE CREDITS — IG702 BOT Want 50 FREE credits for the Instagram mass reporting Bot? @IG702_bot👀🔥 All you have to do is support my open-source cybersecurity project VulnX Security Scanner by giving it a ⭐ on GitHub! 🔗 Repo1: https://github.com/sh…»
🚨 🎁 50 FREE CREDITS — IG702 BOT Want 50 FREE credits for the Instagram mass reporting Bot? @IG702_bot👀🔥 All you have to do is support my open-source cybersecurity project VulnX Security Scanner by giving it a ⭐ on GitHub! 🔗 Repo1: https://github.com/shubhushubhu99/vulnXscanner 🔗 Repo1: https://github.com/shubhushubhu99/scanX ⭐ How to Star the Repository 1️⃣ Open the GitHub link above. 2️⃣ Log in to your GitHub …
Signed Shubham Yadav
https://youtu.be/gYab8IceoCM
❤5
Signed Shubham Yadav
https://youtu.be/_y7v6YnrNvM?si=kjBrVKIzhOk5d-Wy
❤8🥰1
Signed Shubham Yadav
https://youtu.be/4zzdEbYElQc?si=vvAZhXxjZKTAghur
Signed Shubham Yadav
Binary and Decimal Converter This Python program converts binary numbers to decimal and vice versa. It's a practice project by Guccifer Shubham, a learner exploring Python programming. Please note that slight inaccuracies may occur in binary to decimal conversions due to rounding assumptions in the code. Features - Binary to Decimal Conversion: Convert binary numbers to decimal. - Decimal to Binary Conversion: Con…
👍5
Signed Guccifer Shubham
Leak in Nuevatel ( www.viva.com.bo ) Leak include: The amount of data reaches 10TB and includes: 198Gb - infrastructure, locations, development plan, power supply, maintenance, tests, documentation, photo reports of all LTE hotspots - CONFIDENTIAL 205Gb - support and development of hotspots network by years 11Gb - hotspots audit 80Gb - monitoring 35Gb - user data 3Gb - client database - HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL 15Gb - …
👍4
Signed Guccifer Shubham
Guccigo: where technology makes sense! pinned Deleted message
Guccigo: where technology makes sense! pinned Deleted message
Thanks for your kind words 😊🙏
❤8
Signed Guccifer Shubham
🤗 100 members completed.. 🎯 Target - 1k IG502 will be uploaded in free once we reached on 1k (current price 50$ ) Due to spam protection, board is currently set on admin verification so it'll take few times to activate the account, if you have any problem while registering then you can contact us by below link 👇 https://gucigo.com/memberlist.php?mode=contactadmin
🥰1
Signed Guccifer Shubham
https://youtu.be/HfFqyW-O7GY?si=ggigB7JEwU7T5Fj_
Signed Guccifer Shubham
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @gucigo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Guccigo: where technology makes sense!” (@gucigo), 2,297 subscribers as measured 18 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gucigo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.