Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for AdGuard

Channel

AdGuard

@adguarden

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,374subscribers

+93 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001196919695
TypeChannel
Username@adguarden
Created16 August 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/adguarden

Growth

7,2817,3767,328.56 August 2026 — 7,281 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,281 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,283 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,286 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,289 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,317 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,331 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,343 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,345 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,350 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,353 subscribers4 September 2026 — 7,376 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,374 subscribers7,3746 August 20269 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 34 days, net +93. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,267–7,390 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 14:597,374-2
4 Sept 2026, 09:177,376+23
1 Sept 2026, 08:287,353+3
29 Aug 2026, 05:277,350+5
26 Aug 2026, 10:237,345+2
23 Aug 2026, 01:177,343+12
19 Aug 2026, 05:047,331+14
16 Aug 2026, 15:377,317+28
12 Aug 2026, 15:337,289+3
10 Aug 2026, 02:017,286+3
7 Aug 2026, 00:037,283+2
6 Aug 2026, 18:307,281no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:207,281first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.3%
avg views ÷ 7,374 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,130
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.87%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held26 (14 July 202619 August 2026)
Views total6,776
Reactions total127
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 11:42 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
40s
Average length
40s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

611 reactions across 26 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
22236.3%
👍18630.4%
🔥6210.1%
😍325.24%
🏆213.44%
🎃182.95%
🥰111.80%
🤝101.64%
❤‍🔥91.47%
👏91.47%
71.15%
🤯71.15%
🎉50.818%
🍾30.491%
🕊30.491%
😁30.491%
😐20.327%
🙈10.164%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 611 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 26 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @adguarden. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 26 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 July 2026 to 19 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTC696 views12 reactionsread 20 August 2026

🧾 Time to settle your attention bill 1-day flash sale: 👉 AdGuard VPN two-year subscription 80% off Offer valid on August 19th only!

9❤‍🔥2🎃1

19 Aug 2026, 12:08 UTC627 views9 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

⏱ Nothing on the internet is actually free. You’re always paying — just in different currencies Over the next three days, we’re breaking down what “free” and “paid” content really costs you. Today’s currency: your attention, your time, and your device’s resources. We did the math ourselves: with an ad blocker enabled, web pages load roughly 45% faster and consume 30–40% less data. This isn't just about a cleaner sc

8🎃1

14 Aug 2026, 16:19 UTC≈1,470 views21 reactionsread 20 August 2026

🎤 Speak at the Ad Blocker Developer Summit — Copenhagen, November 3–4 Once a year, the people dedicated to making the web cleaner and more private gather in one room for two days. This year, that room is in Copenhagen, and there’s still space for you on stage! 🌟The people Devs from the likes of AdGuard, Brave, eyeo, Ghostery, Google, Malwarebytes, Mozilla, and Opera, filter maintainers and privacy researchers 🌟The

8👍5🥰5🤝2🎃1

12 Aug 2026, 13:13 UTC≈1,630 views58 reactions11 Starsread 20 August 2026
Photo

💚 The team behind uAssets, the filter lists used by uBlock Origin, says it will stop fixing ad-blocking issues on Facebook. They say Facebook keeps finding ways around new fixes, making the work increasingly difficult to sustain. This won’t affect AdGuard’s Facebook filters. We maintain our own rules and will continue updating them. There’s nothing to celebrate here. It shows how hard it is for small, often volunte

31👍16👏5🏆4😐2

11 Aug 2026, 14:11 UTC≈1,640 views18 reactionsread 20 August 2026

📬 AdGuard Mail v1.6: Easier feedback and in-app version history Great services aren’t built in a vacuum — your feedback means the world to us. In the AdGuard Mail v1.6 update, we’ve made it seamless to report bugs, export logs, or check the changelog in just a couple of clicks. What’s new in this release: 🌟Quick reports for rejected aliases If a website refuses to accept an alias you created, you no longer have to

8👍8🏆2

10 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC≈1,540 views16 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

🚨 Last chance to join the speaker lineup at the ABDS! Only a week until the call for paper closes. Whether you’re a dev, researcher, or privacy advocate — if you’ve got something to share, we want to hear it! 👉 Submit your talk idea for the Ad Blocker Developer Summit 2026 — deadline: August 16. If you know someone who might want to attend or speak — share this post with them! This event is community-driven, and t

6🔥6👍4

7 Aug 2026, 07:19 UTC≈1,930 views32 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

🫥 You didn't log in, didn't leave an email, switched on "incognito" — and the site still recognizes you. How? It's because of your digital fingerprint. As you simply open a page, your browser helpfully reveals dozens of small things: device model, OS version, language, screen resolution, installed fonts, time zone, exactly how your graphics card renders images. Individually, not a big deal. Together, a combination t

👍139🔥6🍾3🎃1

5 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC≈1,560 views14 reactionsread 20 August 2026

As the saying goes, better to ship a hotfix than regret it forever! We recently released AdGuard for Android v4.13, and now we’re dropping a quick hotfix to squash a couple of bugs that popped up right after the launch. ⚡️ A crucial note for anyone using Integration mode: To keep AdGuard Ad Blocker and AdGuard VPN running seamlessly together, make sure to update both apps to their latest versions. This is critical

44👍4🤝2

5 Aug 2026, 06:35 UTC≈1,660 views40 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

🔗 Copy any link from social media and look at the tail: ?utm_source=…&fbclid=… That's not a technical necessity, those are tags. They tell the site where you came from, and some (like fbclid) can tie your click to your social profile. And when you forward that link to a friend, you send your tags along with it. 💚 AdGuard's Tracking protection (formerly Stealth Mode) strips these tails automatically: the page opens

18👍11🔥9🎃1👏1

4 Aug 2026, 04:35 UTC≈1,560 views6 reactionsread 20 August 2026

💚 AdGuard Mini for Mac v2.3: New setup checks and better diagnostics AdGuard Mini is designed to run quietly in the background. But when ad blocking suddenly stops working after a macOS update or data migration to a new Mac, tracking down the issue can be tricky. In the latest version of AdGuard Mini, we decided to take the hassle out of it — now the app diagnoses problems on the fly, explains what's wrong, and show

3👍2🎃1

3 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC≈1,410 views27 reactionsread 20 August 2026

🥷 New versions of AdGuard VPN for Android and iOS! “VPNs, assemble!" (We Googled it and confirmed it's the legendary superhero battle cry, so we thought it would be super cool to drop it into our post about the latest VPN updates). In these releases, we’ve packed in handy new features, squashed annoying bugs, and tackled crucial security upgrades: 🌟 Instant disconnection (Android & iOS): We fixed a critical bug —

8👍8❤‍🔥6🥰2😍2🎃1

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @adguarden. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

AdGuard [RU]
@adguardru · 35,926
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
Proton
@proton_privacy · 37,602
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 31 August 2026
apkmirror.com official
@apkmirror_official · 32,614
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AdGuard” (@adguarden), 7,374 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/adguarden.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.