25 measurements spanning 27 days, net +26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35,807–36,048 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
2 Sept 2026, 10:27
35,876
-17
1 Sept 2026, 07:05
35,893
-23
31 Aug 2026, 04:04
35,916
+13
30 Aug 2026, 01:05
35,903
-1
28 Aug 2026, 21:54
35,904
-4
28 Aug 2026, 00:38
35,908
-10
26 Aug 2026, 23:46
35,918
-17
26 Aug 2026, 01:14
35,935
+3
25 Aug 2026, 04:26
35,932
-21
24 Aug 2026, 03:04
35,953
-50
22 Aug 2026, 07:28
36,003
-17
20 Aug 2026, 22:47
36,020
+76
20 Aug 2026, 01:28
35,944
+23
18 Aug 2026, 22:36
35,921
+19
17 Aug 2026, 19:18
35,902
+7
16 Aug 2026, 13:46
35,895
+30
14 Aug 2026, 17:24
35,865
+12
13 Aug 2026, 09:38
35,853
+18
12 Aug 2026, 06:02
35,835
-12
10 Aug 2026, 03:42
35,847
first reading
Engagement
35 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
28.0%
avg views ÷ 35,876 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,000
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.876%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 35 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
35 (19 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
210,740
Reactions total
1,847
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 08:24 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈622
Videos
≈6
Links
≈1,070
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
43s
Average length
43s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,252 reactions across 35 posts, in 37 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,534
47.2%
❤
894
27.5%
🔥
183
5.63%
🤡
109
3.35%
🤝
95
2.92%
🤯
55
1.69%
🥰
50
1.54%
⚡
45
1.38%
😍
35
1.08%
👏
28
0.861%
😁
28
0.861%
💯
25
0.769%
✍
19
0.584%
🎉
18
0.554%
💩
17
0.523%
🤔
17
0.523%
🤷♂
17
0.523%
🤬
11
0.338%
👾
8
0.246%
🏆
7
0.215%
17 further kinds
57
1.75%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,252 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
29
across the posts below
Posts paid on
19
of 35 we hold a reading for · 54%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @adguardru. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 35 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
📉 Сначала Chrome, теперь Edge. Microsoft прощается с Manifest V2
Апокалипсис MV2 официально добрался до Microsoft Edge. Как и Google, Microsoft начала постепенное отключение платформы, на которой работают ваши любимые блокировщики рекламы.
В сети уже полно панических заголовков в духе: «Edge запрещает адблоки!». На деле всё не настолько драматично, хотя и не так безобидно, как обещает сама Microsoft.
Что происходит…
🥷 TrustTunnel v1.2: теперь в Mac App Store
Давайте честно: не всем нравится ковыряться в Терминале. Раньше пользователям macOS приходилось лезть в командную строку, чтобы просто запустить TrustTunnel. С выходом версии 1.2 эти времена официально остались в прошлом!
Теперь TrustTunnel — это полноценное приложение, которое можно скачать прямо из Mac App Store. Никаких командных строк и сложных манипуляций — только ком…
⏰ Откладываете задачи на потом? Понимаем
Но если вы всё ещё тянули с покупкой лицензии AdGuard, считайте это знаком. Сделайте подарок себе и своим устройствам — обеспечьте им покой без рекламы:
💚 Блокировщик AdGuard со скидкой до 40%
☁️ AdGuard DNS со скидкой 55%
Успейте прокачать защиту до 3 сентября включительно
🤫 Секретный чит-код для идеальной концентрации
Последние несколько дней мы много обсуждали цифровую безопасность. Среди агрессивных трекеров, диких попапов и мошенников, охотящихся за вашими паролями, попытка просто сосредоточиться в сети превращается во что-то по-настоящему экстремальное.
Так быть не должно.
Ловите наши традиционные скидки, которые помогут закрыть вопрос приватности в интернете и наконец-то споко…
ИИ и продуктивность: где грань между «помог» и «сделал всю работу за тебя»?
Забавный факт: по данным RAND, большинство школьников, которые используют ИИ для домашки, сами беспокоятся, что это вредит их критическому мышлению. То есть даже дети чувствуют подвох.
Скрепя сердце, мы можем согласиться с тем, что нейросети — это неплохой помощник (можно сказать: заплатка), когда речь идёт о работе или учёбе. Но умение мыс…
📚 Список литературы от AdGuard
То, что вы не прочли этим летом, потому что лежали на пляже или трогали траву (и правильно делали).
Успеваем нагнать до сентября:
🕶️ Изучаем, как ИИ-очки Meta снова не сдали тест на приватность, запомнившись для многих как очередной инструмент слежки
⚽ Вспоминаем главное событие этого лета, Чемпионат мира по футболу, и рассчитываем, сколько же всё-таки стоил один глоток воды на стад…
🌅 Представьте обычный весенний вечер. До экзаменов остаются считаные недели, школьник или студент сидит над конспектами в стрессе и пытается объять необъятное. В поисках «сливов», шпаргалок или готовых решений он вбивает запрос в браузер — и в этот же момент попадает прямо под прицел киберпреступников.
За одну только прошлую весну в учебных сетях заблокировали больше 32 миллиардов обращений к опасным ресурсам. В обы…
🎚 Третий способ оплаты: ваш выбор
Финал нашего трёхдневного разбора. Воровство внимания и данных хотя бы можно заметить. А вот право выбора у нас забирают тихо — заранее, через настройки по умолчанию и хитрый дизайн интерфейсов.
Как вами манипулируют на сайтах:
🌟Иллюзия согласия: когда на куки-баннере есть честная кнопка «Отклонить», от слежки отказываются 50–70% пользователей. Но стоит спрятать эту кнопку на втор…
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @adguardru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
hidemyname: безопасный интернет @hidemyname_ru · 48,357 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 2 September 2026
Игромир @Igromir_cloud · 59,230 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AdGuard [RU]” (@adguardru), 35,876 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/adguardru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.