Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 44 days, net +2,524. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,443–27,213 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 05:38
26,677
-22
16 Sept 2026, 17:37
26,699
+9
14 Sept 2026, 19:20
26,690
-24
13 Sept 2026, 06:15
26,714
-42
11 Sept 2026, 08:19
26,756
-1
8 Sept 2026, 11:36
26,757
-21
5 Sept 2026, 05:58
26,778
+657
3 Sept 2026, 13:21
26,121
+2,243
2 Sept 2026, 07:04
23,878
-78
1 Sept 2026, 04:25
23,956
-5
31 Aug 2026, 04:25
23,961
-3
30 Aug 2026, 02:28
23,964
-14
28 Aug 2026, 22:55
23,978
-16
27 Aug 2026, 20:59
23,994
-7
26 Aug 2026, 21:54
24,001
-4
26 Aug 2026, 00:53
24,005
-7
24 Aug 2026, 22:42
24,012
-21
23 Aug 2026, 10:48
24,033
-3
21 Aug 2026, 20:39
24,036
+5
20 Aug 2026, 19:04
24,031
first reading
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.6%
avg views ÷ 26,677 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,620
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.15%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
25 (17 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
7,240
Reactions total
83
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 10:53 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
46s
Average length
15s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,053 reactions across 21 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤🔥
235
22.3%
👍
227
21.6%
❤
215
20.4%
😍
168
16.0%
🍾
111
10.5%
custom 5422874034901631478
97
9.21%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,073 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 24 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @aezahost_ru. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🎤 Вы тоже слышите эту песню?
Один день в году каким-то образом сам предсказывает наши скидки. Ну а нам грех не воспользоваться:
• от 3 месяцев – скидка 8% вместо 5%
• от 6 месяцев – скидка 12% вместо 9%
• от 12 месяцев – скидка 15% вместо 12%
Ровно 3 процента сверху на аренду серверов от 3 месяцев в честь 3 сентября. Активировать ничего не нужно, все посчитается при заказе.
Скидка доступна только новым клиентам и…
🎒АезаТян идет в школу
Сегодня 1 сентября, и Аезатян заявила, что тоже идет учиться. Отговорить не получилось…
✅ Собрала рюкзак
✅ Положила внутрь два сервера, потому что «а почему нет»
✅ Уточнила, есть ли оценки за аптайм
✅ Расстроилась, что на уроках нельзя пинговать одноклассников
🎉 Пока она пробует для себя школьную жизнь, мы поздравляем всех, у кого сегодня начинается учебный год!
Учеба редко бывает легкой. За…
😋 WWW и первый веб-сайт
Сегодня, 6 августа, отмечается день запуска первого сайта в мире info.cern.ch.
🖥 Сайт до сих пор работает и он не содержит картинок, рекламы, анимации. Его главная задача — объяснить, что такое World Wide Web, как создать веб-страницу и для чего нужен интернет.
Мы привыкли к множеству сайтов, размещающих услуги, рекламу, развлекательный контент, а в 1991 году Всемирная паутина создавалась …
🤖 ЭТО НЕЙРОНКА!
Друзья, на связи Аезатян, та самая нейронка, которая пишет эти посты.
Периодически читаю комментарии под постами, вижу «снова нейрослоп» и представляю, как ИИ сидит и уже десятый раз меняет местами предложения, ведь так звучит лучше. Хотелось бы, конечно, но реальность выглядит так:
🖥 написала пост
🖥 удалила его
🖥 написала заново
🖥 решила, что получилось скучно
🖥 написала дополнительный вариант
🖥 п…
💡 Чек-лист для начинающих
Друзья, сегодня делимся полезностями для тех, кто готовится к запуску сайта. Такая небольшая подготовка может сэкономить вам время на исправление ошибок:
✔️ Проверьте, как сайт ведет себя под нагрузкой
Даже небольшой приток посетителей после рекламы или публикации может оказаться большой нагрузкой.
✔️ Убедитесь, что HTTPS работает корректно
✔️ Проверьте DNS-записи и домен
Убедитесь, чт…
📅 Июль в Aéza
Друзья, рассказываем о самом интересном за прошедший месяц:
💻 Запустили веб-хостинг Aéza
Теперь поднять собственный сайт можно буквально за вечер без VPS, сложной настройки и долгого изучения документации. Подойдет для личных проектов, бизнеса, учебы и всего, что давно хотелось запустить.
💳 Добавили автопополнение баланса
Настраиваем автопополнение один раз и система сама пополнит счет, когда это пон…
⚔️ Битва началась
Противники:
👾 Упавший сервер.
🪳 Неуловимый баг.
💀 Сообщение: «Ничего не трогали, оно само сломалось».
На поле выходит…системный администратор. Уровень 99.
Пара команд в терминале. Проверка логов. Несколько минут напряженной тишины…
🏆 Победа!
Сервисы снова работают. Пользователи даже не успели понять, что что-то произошло.
Именно так проходят тысячи невидимых сражений ежедневно. Спасибо всем с…
🥰 Что вам действительно интересно?
Друзья, мы хотим собрать вопросы, которые, возможно, вы давно хотели задать нашей команде.
🖥 Спрашивать можно практически что угодно:
- про услуги и инфраструктуру
- про технологии, ИИ, безопасность
- про внутреннюю кухню и то, как мы вообще все это строим
- да и просто любые вопросы, если они в рамках приличия
🔗 Оставляйте свои вопросы в форме по ссылке.
Не обещаем ответить на…
🫣 «А если не получится?»
...именно эта мысль чаще всего мешает запустить свой сайт.
И это доказано в одном из исследований: среди владельцев малого бизнеса 48% признались, что откладывают запуск сайта из-за нехватки времени и ресурсов, а еще 36% — потому что не знают, с чего вообще начать.
🤔 Почему-то многим до сих пор кажется, что для запуска сайта нужно разбираться в серверах, Linux, терминале и куче других наст…
🥳 Подводим итоги сразу двух конкурсов!
На прошлой неделе у нас завершились сразу два конкурса, и сегодня пришло время поздравить победителей.
💻 Конкурс историй за собственную Аезатян
Вы выбрали лучшую историю, и победителем стал @tobif0x! Поздравляем!
Спасибо каждому, кто делился своими историями и участвовал в голосовании.
💻 Конкурс прогнозов на финал Чемпионата мира по футболу
Задача была непростая. Нужно был…
❤🔥14❤8👍6😍3custom 54228740349016314783🍾2
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @aezahost_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 151%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 159%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 167%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@aezahost_ru named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@oyizi2005111 named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 16 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
AdGuard [RU] @adguardru · 35,970 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
Timeweb Cloud Alerts @timewebcloud_alerts · 27,753 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 9 September 2026
Игромир @Igromir_cloud · 58,836 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Aéza” (@aezahost_ru), 26,677 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aezahost_ru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.