Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Всё об СДВГ

Channel

Всё об СДВГ

@adhd_recharge

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,938subscribers

+10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001486811314
TypeChannel
Username@adhd_recharge
Created28 February 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/adhd_recharge

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

17,90017,93817,9196 August 2026 — 17,928 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,928 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,929 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,925 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,919 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,925 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,917 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,915 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,900 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,910 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,911 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,908 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,912 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,919 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,908 subscribers21 August 2026 — 17,904 subscribers23 August 2026 — 17,908 subscribers24 August 2026 — 17,927 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,925 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,929 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,925 subscribers28 August 2026 — 17,921 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,914 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,920 subscribers31 August 2026 — 17,923 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,928 subscribers2 September 2026 — 17,936 subscribers3 September 2026 — 17,929 subscribers5 September 2026 — 17,933 subscribers8 September 2026 — 17,934 subscribers11 September 2026 — 17,938 subscribers6 August 202611 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 35 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,894–17,944 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 00:1917,938+4
8 Sept 2026, 01:1617,934+1
5 Sept 2026, 01:5717,933+4
3 Sept 2026, 09:5417,929-7
2 Sept 2026, 05:4417,936+8
1 Sept 2026, 06:0717,928+5
31 Aug 2026, 08:4417,923+3
30 Aug 2026, 07:0717,920+6
29 Aug 2026, 08:0617,914-7
28 Aug 2026, 10:5717,921-4
27 Aug 2026, 13:0417,925-4
26 Aug 2026, 14:3817,929+4
25 Aug 2026, 18:0717,925-2
24 Aug 2026, 20:1817,927+19
23 Aug 2026, 08:0417,908+4
21 Aug 2026, 20:1717,904-4
20 Aug 2026, 17:4417,908-11
19 Aug 2026, 14:2417,919+7
18 Aug 2026, 15:0817,912+4
17 Aug 2026, 17:0617,908first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 31 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.5%
avg views ÷ 17,938 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,600
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.90%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 30 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held30 (31 January 20261 September 2026)
Views total20,800
Reactions total396
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 08:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,272 reactions across 30 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,62271.4%
👍30513.4%
🕊1767.75%
💅1697.44%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,272 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 31 January 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 10:16 UTC≈1,050 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🟢 Набор открыт 🩷 Когда можно вступить 🔘Прямо сейчас, с 1 по 5 сентября включительно 🩷 Что я получу, присоединившись Пространство, которое помогает нейроотличным людям начинать давно откладываемые дела и придерживаться рутин — за счёт внешней структуры, а не силы воли 🔘Подробное описание 🔘Отзывы - по хештегу #отзывыбчч 🩷 Как присоединиться Участие в проекте платное, на основе подписки 🔘990 ₽/мес. Не зайдёт - 7 д

8

Signed Nikita Yakunin

28 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC≈1,890 views21 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @bchch_channelPhoto

Как внешняя структура устроена в Больше, чем чате Вчера написал пост в основной канал о внешней структуре и о том, как важно для мозга максимально очерчивать ясный контекст работы Сегодня хочу показать, как это работает в Больше, чем чате ⬇️ В начале было слово... 🔘Есть конкретное время: бадди-сессия начинается и заканчивается в определённый момент и длится 90 минут 🔘Есть конкретное дело: в начале сессии люди п

21

Signed Nikita Yakunin

27 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC≈2,080 views52 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Вам не нужен очередной лайфхак. Вам нужна своя комната 🕊️🕊️🕊️ Признавайтесь, у кого было: переступаете порог комнаты — и мозг как будто обнуляется, всё вылетает из головы? У меня вот постоянно Мозг — контекстно-чувствительная штука. Он непрерывно собирает происходящее в отдельные модели событий: «я работаю», «я готовлю», «я отдыхаю», «я куда-то иду». Когда меняется место, цель, люди вокруг или набор вещей перед гл

50👍2

Signed Nikita Yakunin

21 Aug 2026, 09:19 UTC≈2,920 views107 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Что делать, если сил мало, а задач — много Поставь таймер на 5 минут и сделай минимальный первый шаг вроде "открыть документ". Больше не нужно, сейчас задача просто 5 минут. Нужно продолжить, но все равно нет сил? Ещё таймер на 5 минут. Написать первое предложение в документ. И так далее. Суббота близко, ты сможешь. Step by step. Прокрастинируешь начать? Поставь таймер "легальной прокрастинации" на 15 минут. Ког

97👍10

Signed Nikita Yakunin

20 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC≈2,900 views69 reactionsread 3 September 2026

А у вас тоже такое приятное чувство конца рабочей недели с одним лишь маленьким подвохом, сегодня четверг?

💅3422👍13

Signed Nikita Yakunin

19 Aug 2026, 19:32 UTC≈3,240 views27 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

В продолжение: а делать-то что? 🕊️🕊️🕊️ ❤️Так в итоге, планировать в соответствие с циклом? Эта тема широко педалируется в популярной психологии. Коротко: нет, для универсальных рекомендаций планирования в соответствие с циклом оснований нет ни в случае с СДВГ, ни вообще — это попросту лженаучно А вот находить какие-либо индивидуальные паттерны мне кажется полезным в любом случае и это то, что следует из многих р

19🕊8

Signed Nikita Yakunin

14 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC≈3,560 views98 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

СДВГ и топ 5 мифов о менструальном цикле 🙅‍♀️ "В общем, всё просто: в первой половине цикла эстроген высокий, следовательно и дофамин, симптомы улучшаются. Во второй эстроген низкий вместе с дофамином, СДВГ ухудшается. Планируйте важные дела в соответствие с циклом — и будет вам счастье" Согласитесь, очень удобная схема. Есть только одна маленькая проблема: почти каждый её элемент либо попросту физиологически невер

69🕊13👍9💅7

Signed Nikita Yakunin

12 Aug 2026, 16:14 UTC≈3,160 views14 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Poll

Замечали ли вы, что выраженность симптомов меняется в течение менструального цикла?

  1. Да, довольно заметно38%
  2. Возможно / иногда15%
  3. Нет, не замечала10%
  4. Не отслеживала14%
  5. Не относится ко мне / результаты23%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14

Signed Nikita Yakunin

10 Aug 2026, 16:53 UTC≈3,860 views13 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Поделитесь в комментариях последним найденным решением/техникой/лайфхаком, которое оказалось для вас эффективным)

8👍5

Signed Nikita Yakunin

10 Aug 2026, 16:50 UTC≈4,090 views49 reactionsread 3 September 2026

СДВГ и 10%-решения 😞 🕊️🕊️🕊️ Как мало кто из вас знает, ваш брат имеет далеко не праздный интерес к теме комплексной травмы, так что иногда почитывает литературу по теме И вот, в книге Янины Фишер - Трансформация травмы мне понравилась одна мысль, которую я нахожу полезной и при СДВГ Из разряда вроде бы банально, но помнить об этом полезно: 💡Если вкратце, то Фишер пишет о том, что ни один конкретный метод не заст

44🕊3👍2

Signed Nikita Yakunin

7 Aug 2026, 18:32 UTC≈4,420 views138 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Итоги года? Ну а может, итоги полугода? * pic - current mood И снова привет. Хочется поделиться тем, что происходит в моей жизни и проекте, что получилось, что не получилось, какие из этого сделаны выводы и тд 🕊️🕊️🕊️ ❤️ СДВГшные амбиции не сошлись с реальностью При том, что чего-то наполеоновского я особо и не планировал (а мог!). К настоящему моменту я ожидал от себя большего. Тем не менее, так бывает. Прогно

85🕊35👍18

Signed Nikita Yakunin

4 Aug 2026, 15:28 UTC≈4,050 views81 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Совпадение? А кто его знает

💅4627👍7🕊1

Signed Nikita Yakunin

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @adhd_recharge. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Aug 2026, 16:14 UTCAnonymous Poll690 voters

Замечали ли вы, что выраженность симптомов меняется в течение менструального цикла?

  1. Да, довольно заметно38%
  2. Возможно / иногда15%
  3. Нет, не замечала10%
  4. Не отслеживала14%
  5. Не относится ко мне / результаты23%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Jul 2026, 17:06 UTCAnonymous Poll1,060 voters approx.

Ваш СДВГ

  1. Мой СДВГ плюс-минус стабилен35%
  2. Мой СДВГ то улучшается, то ухудшается65%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 31 January 2026 to 1 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Где моё внимание?
@pure_cognitions_adhd · 27,227
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Всё об СДВГ” (@adhd_recharge), 17,938 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/adhd_recharge.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.