Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for آگاهی

Channel

آگاهی

@agahiiiii

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,161subscribers

+74 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001054749820
TypeChannel
Username@agahiiiii
Created6 July 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/agahiiiii

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,0876,1616,1246 August 2026 — 6,087 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,087 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,092 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,094 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,096 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,104 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,093 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,104 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,112 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,117 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,140 subscribers6 September 2026 — 6,146 subscribers11 September 2026 — 6,156 subscribers18 September 2026 — 6,161 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 43 days, net +74. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,076–6,172 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 20:556,161+5
11 Sept 2026, 05:156,156+10
6 Sept 2026, 08:566,146+6
2 Sept 2026, 10:256,140+23
30 Aug 2026, 19:546,117+5
27 Aug 2026, 12:426,112+8
24 Aug 2026, 17:576,104+11
20 Aug 2026, 21:246,093-11
17 Aug 2026, 17:066,104+8
14 Aug 2026, 01:476,096+2
10 Aug 2026, 12:336,094+2
7 Aug 2026, 04:476,092+5
6 Aug 2026, 20:456,087no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:396,087first reading

Engagement

32 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 32 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

706 reactions across 31 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬32445.9%
16523.4%
👍10114.3%
👏7410.5%
💔192.69%
🔥60.85%
👌50.708%
😢30.425%
😭30.425%
❤‍🔥20.283%
🤩20.283%
🤯10.142%
🥰10.142%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 706 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 32 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @agahiiiii. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 32 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 22:27 UTC120 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

هوا پسه بچه؛ بخند و تا میتونی بزرگ نشو! این دنیای کوچک‌تر و بی‌رحم‌تر از آن است که بتواند آرزوهای قشنگت را برآورده کند. هر کس به تو وعده برآورده شدن خواهش‌هایت را داد تو باور نکن عزیز من، باور نکن دلبرکم، دست‌های کوچکت را روی به سوی هیچ آسمانی بلند نکن از آسمان هم آبی برایت گرم نمی‌شود عزیز دلم باور کن؛ همه این دنیا فقط تویی و برخی از دوستان و پدر و مادرت که تکرار نمی‌شوند؛ بقیه همه تکراری‌ و ملال آور و خسته کننده‌ان

👏4👌1

11 Aug 2026, 20:14 UTC218 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

نیچه می‌گفت: آدم‌ها تعصب بر باورهایشان را نشانه‌ وفاداری می‌دانند، حال آنکه گاهی فقط نشانه‌ ترس از نوسازی خویشتن است. چقدر از تصمیم‌های ما، چقدر از رابطه‌هایی که در آن‌ها سوخته‌ایم، و چقدر از ایده‌هایی که از پا افتاده‌اند، فقط به این دلیل ادامه پیدا می‌کنند که روزی انتخابشان کرده بودیم؟ شجاعت واقعی در ادامه دادن همه‌چیز نیست؛ گاهی در اعتراف به این است که: آن انتخاب، متعلق به نسخه‌ دیروز من بود. @agahiiiii

👍103👌1

11 Aug 2026, 16:39 UTC292 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

حقیقتش اینه که تو طول زندگیم وقت‌های کمی بوده که آرامش را به معنای واقعی کلمه تجربه کرده‌ باشم. اما به جرات می‌توانم بگویم تو این اوقات محدود تجربه آرامش هیچ کدامشان مانند این لحظه نبوده که این بچه اینطوری بغلم به خواب عمیق رفته. ی طوری حس آرامش به من داده این لحظه ناب که باور کنید نمی‌تونم توصیفش کنم. حیوان خونگی خیلی خوبه پیشنهاد می‌کنم حضورش را از خودتان دریغ نکنید. #امید_بیداری 🖤🖤🖤

14👍1

11 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTC297 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026

داستایوفسکی در یادداشت‌های زیرزمینی حقیقت تلخی را رو می‌کند: انسان گاهی حاضر است همه‌چیزش را بدهد، فقط برای اینکه ثابت کند وابسته یا خوار نیست. اما پارادوکس ماجرا اینجاست: دقیقا در همان لحظه‌ای که برای اثبات بی‌نیازی‌ات نقاب غرور می‌پوشی، ارزشمندترین بخش وجودت را به قضاوت همان آدمی فروخته‌ای که مدعی بودی برایت مهم نیست!!! این هم تلخ است هم تامل برانگیز. @agahiiiii

17💔2

11 Aug 2026, 02:43 UTC478 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026

کامو در جایی می‌گوید: چه کسی جرأت دارد، در این دنیایی که هیچ‌کس بی‌گناه نیست مرا محکوم کند؟ حقیقتش این است هر بار که نصیحت‌های صد من ی غاز دعوت کنندگان به رعایت اخلاق و خوبی و گوگولی بودن را می‌بینم یا می‌شنوم از این همه بلاهت شگفت زده می‌شوم! و جالب این است که این دقیقا چیزیست که حکومت‌های توتالیتر می‌خواهند؛ شهروند به مثابه گوسفند! شیک و مجلسی و اتو کشیده و لفظ قلم. چه توجیهی وجود دارد در جائی که انسانیت من به رسم

👏17👍1🔥1

10 Aug 2026, 03:25 UTC460 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

تو نمیدانی نه! هرگز نخواهی دانست که این جاده‌ بی‌انتها به کدامین غروب خواهد رسید... پس برقص عزیز من؛ برق و لذت ببر از تک تک لحظه‌هایت *برقص؛ پیش از آنکه پروا‌نه‌ها خاطره گل‌های پیراهنت را برای شکوفه‌های پلاسیده تعریف کنند و حریر نازک دامنت را دست‌های زبر زندگی نخ‌کش کند.* آری برقص که زندگی بسیار کوتاه است و وقت تنگ... برقص عزیز من، در جهانی که همین الان هم گذشته به حساب می‌آید هر کار دیگری به غیر از رقصیدن کاری بیهو

12

9 Aug 2026, 21:12 UTC570 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

#پادکست_شب #دلهره_هستی #قسمت_ششم #دلمردگی #آلبر_کامو خوانش: #امید_بیداری #podcast_vip @agahiiiii

3

9 Aug 2026, 02:36 UTC688 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

بی نومیدی شوق زندگی وجود ندارد... 🖤🖤🖤 @agahiiiii

6👍2

8 Aug 2026, 18:37 UTC613 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026

هر انسانی را با تازیانه، آتش یا دارویی به مشقت آخرین لحظه زندگی دچار کنید تا از دریچه شکنجه‌ای هولناک تن به پالایش عظیمی دهد که دیدار با مرگ فراهمش می کند. آنگاه رهایش کنید که از وحشت آن‌قدر برود تا از پا بیفتد. من تضمین می‌کنم که تاثیر آن را نمی‌توان با هیچ روش معمولی مقایسه کرد. اگر می‌‌توانستم تمام جهان را به مشقتی عظیم دچار می‌کردم تا زندگی را از ریشه بپالاید؛ بی صدا پایه‌های زندگی را به آتش می‌کشیدم، نه برای ویر

11

7 Aug 2026, 23:05 UTC870 views18 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

‍‍بعضی از آدم‌ها را هیچ وقت نمی‌شه فراموش کرد، چرا که در کنارشون حسی رو تجربه می‌کنیم که قبل از دیدن آنها نمی‌دونستیم اصلا چنین حسی وجود داره. اینا جزو اون کسایی هستند که باور داریم خیلی وقته می‌شناسیم و انگار روزهای بسیاری با اونها سر کردیم، کسایی که کنارشون احساس نزدیکی تن به تن می‌کنیم و احساس می‌کنیم از سالهای دور با ما و در کنارمان بوده‌اند. شاید از وقتی که انفجار بزرگ رخ داد با ما بوده‌اند و اتم‌های وجودمان در

💔114👏3

7 Aug 2026, 22:51 UTC563 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

سرپرستِ دانشگاهِ هایدلبرگ، در سی‌امِ ژوئیه‌ی ۱۸۱۶، نامه‌ای را به فردریش هگل به منظورِ پیشنهادِ تصاحبِ کرسیِ دانشگاهی، به عنوانِ استادِ برجسته نوشت. او درخواستش را به صورت زیر توضیح داد: «هایدلبرگ برای نخستین بار از بدوِ تأسیسش، فیلسوفی خواهد داشت. اسپینوزا نیز درخواست‌نامه‌ای را از هایدلبرگ دریافت کرده بود، اما همان طور که شما بدونِ شک مطلع‌اید، بیهوده.» دقیقاً ما با نامه‌ی سی‌ام مارسِ ۱۶۷۳ اسپینوزا [در پاسخ به دعوتِ

👏5

7 Aug 2026, 03:38 UTC775 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

#پادکست_شب #فراسوی_نیک_و_بد #درباره_پیش‌داوری‌های_فیلسوفان #قسمت_اول #نیچه خوانش: #امید_بیداری #podcast_vip @agahiiiii

👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @agahiiiii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Absurd Mind's Media
@absurdmindsmedia · 30,782
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 6 September 2026
تاریخ فلسفه با ابوذر شریعتی
@abouzar_shariatii · 32,794
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
HIGH MOVIES
@high_moviess · 52,891
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 24 August 2026
📚 چمدان کتاب
@chamedan_ketab · 74,022
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
نیچه و فلسفه / Theodor
@PHILOSOPHI_ZER · 33,367
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
Dr Behzad Chavooshi
@drbehzadchavooshi · 54,820
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 September 2026
شعر و ادبیات چامه
@chaame · 54,996
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“آگاهی” (@agahiiiii), 6,161 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/agahiiiii.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.