Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ahmad Abu Yahya

Channel

Ahmad Abu Yahya

@ahmadalhanafi

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,097subscribers

-45 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001275199044
TypeChannel
Username@ahmadalhanafi
Created5 August 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ahmadalhanafi

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8,0978,1468,121.56 August 2026 — 8,142 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,142 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,146 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,141 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,133 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,127 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,129 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,121 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,129 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,127 subscribers5 September 2026 — 8,121 subscribers10 September 2026 — 8,112 subscribers13 September 2026 — 8,101 subscribers18 September 2026 — 8,097 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 43 days, net -45. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,090–8,153 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 00:578,097-4
13 Sept 2026, 20:018,101-11
10 Sept 2026, 12:188,112-9
5 Sept 2026, 11:408,121-6
1 Sept 2026, 08:388,127-2
29 Aug 2026, 03:038,129+8
25 Aug 2026, 21:238,121-8
22 Aug 2026, 13:088,129+2
19 Aug 2026, 02:228,127-6
16 Aug 2026, 03:538,133-8
12 Aug 2026, 12:278,141-5
9 Aug 2026, 07:128,146+4
6 Aug 2026, 05:408,142no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:028,142first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.7%
avg views ÷ 8,097 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,270
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held23 (7 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total2,536
Reactions total131
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 18:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,782 reactions across 23 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,21668.2%
👍21111.8%
💯1035.78%
😢995.56%
💔633.54%
❤‍🔥301.68%
🔥291.63%
😱150.842%
🥰70.393%
🫡70.393%
10.056%
👌10.056%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,782 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 23 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ahmadalhanafi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 08:24 UTC416 views30 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @mahmudiyaPhoto

Перед вами перевод книги имама Мухаммада Захида аль-Каусари (1879–1952) «Фикх ахли аль-Ирак ва хадисухум». Книга опровергает заблуждения и мифы, окружавшие ханафитский мазхаб в разные времена, как, например, идею о том, что имам Абу Ханифа, рахимахуллах, предпочитал свое мнение хадису, или что некоторые суждения в фикхе устоялись только потому, что до ханафитов не дошли хадисы. Наш учитель — муфтий Биляль — препода

23👍5❤‍🔥2

27 Aug 2026, 05:54 UTC≈2,120 views101 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Почти все мусульмане-либералы, с которыми я спорил 15 лет назад, сегодня стали неверующими (кафирами). Вот что делает с людьми либерализм. 🖋Дэниел Хакикатджу 🔍 t.me/ahmadalhanafi

💔62😱1513😢11

25 Aug 2026, 14:11 UTC≈1,630 views121 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Прискорбно видеть, что происходит с мусульманской общиной сегодня. Многие не осознают, как важно следовать примеру Пророка Мухаммада, да благословит его Аллах и приветствует. Он пришел, чтобы научить нас всему, и все его слова были задокументированы. Но сегодня многие мусульмане игнорируют это. 🔍 t.me/ahmadalhanafi

73😢35👍9🔥4

22 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC≈1,980 views49 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @muaamalaat

Мой бесплатный курс по основам исламских финансов В курсе 30 десятиминутных (в среднем) уроков, которые знакомят с основными понятиями и контрактами исламской экономической системы. Разбираются следующие темы: ✔️Исламская экономическая система в ряду других экономических систем. ✔️Основные понятия исламской экономики ✔️Фундаментальные запреты ✔️Этичность и общественная польза исламской экономики ✔️Сделка купли-про

👍3514

22 Aug 2026, 09:48 UTC≈1,820 views59 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Имам Суфьян ас-Саври, да помилует его Аллах, изрёк: عند ذكر الصالحين تنزل الرحمة «Когда вспоминают праведников, нисходит милость Аллаха». Хафиз Ибн Абд аль-Барр, комментируя это высказывание, сказал: ومن لم يحفظ من أخبارهم إلا ما ندر من بعضهم في بعض على الحسد والهفوات والغضب والشهوات، دون أن يُعنى بفضائلهم، ويروي مناقبهم = حُرِم التوفيق، ودخل في الغيبة، وحاد عن الطريق، جعلنا الله وإياك ممن يسمع القول فيتبع أحسنه.

50💯5🔥3❤‍🔥1

20 Aug 2026, 13:51 UTC≈1,960 views80 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Имам аль-Матуриди, да помилует его Аллах, в своём толковании 36 аята суры «Алю Имран» пишет следующее: قوله تعالى: {وإني سميتها مريم} دليلٌ على أن تسمية الإناث إلى الأمهات دون الآباء! «В словах “И я назвала её Марьям” содержится указание на то, что девочкам обычно дают имена, исходя из предпочтений матери, а не отца». 📘 Тафсир аль-Матуриди 🔍 t.me/ahmadalhanafi

59👍13🥰7🔥1

20 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTC≈1,600 views50 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Понимание источников знаний — это ключ к половине всех знаний. Важной частью этого понимания является осведомленность о выдающихся ученых. 🔍 t.me/ahmadalhanafi

45👍5

19 Aug 2026, 06:33 UTC≈1,910 views44 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @kitap_kazanPhoto

📌 Ассаляму алейкум, уважаемые братья и сестры! Спешим обрадовать вас прекрасной новостью — вышла в свет новая долгожданная книга! Информация об издании: ⦁ Название: «Опровержение ложных обвинений в адрес Абу Ханифы на основе фактов» ⦁ Автор: Вахби Сулейман Гавджи ⦁ Издательство: AFAQ.PRESS Этот ценный труд опирается на достоверные факты и призван аргументированно развеять любые сомнения и ложные утверждения, напра

38👍6

17 Aug 2026, 09:09 UTC≈1,890 views37 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @darulfikr_bookPhoto

Три книги для прочтения в месяц Рабиуль-Авваль. Учитель Мухаммад ﷺ. Жизнь Пророка Мухаммада ﷺ. Наш Господин Мухаммад ﷺ, Посланник Аллаха.

27👍10

12 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC≈2,460 views25 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @tatyazPhoto

❗🕌Весь месяц Мавлида по средам после намаза икенде в казанской мечети "Марджани" будут проходить вечера вагазов от всеми любимых татарских хазратов. 🤲Первым на следующей неделе перед прихожанами выступит главный казый ДУМ РТ Джалиль хазрат Фазлыев. ☪Не пропустите! Рәхим итегез! Мы в МАХ

25

9 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTC≈3,410 views121 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Иногда мусульманин может столкнуться с человеком, который когда-то был глубоко верующим, но разочаровался в своих религиозных собратьях. Этот человек может рассказать, что оставил соблюдение Ислама, перестал ходить в мечеть и даже возненавидел религиозных людей. В такой ситуации не стоит сомневаться в Исламе, мечетях или в людях, которые следуют религии. Почему? Потому что этот человек сам создал барьер между собой

90🔥12💯11❤‍🔥8

6 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTC≈5,810 views78 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Воспитание обретается в семье или в мечети — именно там закладываются истинные основы нравственности. В интернете невозможно получить подлинное воспитание. Ведь человек сам формулирует запрос, и сеть лишь отражает его желания, предлагая то, что ему приятно слышать. В результате человек сталкивается лишь с тем, что соответствует его собственным взглядам. Совсем иное дело — дом и мечеть. Там тебе могут сказать правду

53👍14💯9❤‍🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @ahmadalhanafi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Шамиль Аляутдинов | umma.ru
@umma_ru · 55,967
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 23 August 2026
Мурад ЛяРиба
@lariba_murad · 63,348
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 August 2026
Нұрсұлтан Рысмағанбет
@NursultanRysmaganbet · 37,623
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ahmad Abu Yahya” (@ahmadalhanafi), 8,097 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ahmadalhanafi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.