Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Abu Ali al-Ashari

Channel

Abu Ali al-Ashari

@abualiashari

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,532subscribers

-48 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001010683774
TypeChannel
Username@abualiashari
Created5 February 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/abualiashari

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8,5328,5918,561.55 August 2026 — 8,580 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,580 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,571 subscribers15 August 2026 — 8,567 subscribers18 August 2026 — 8,563 subscribers21 August 2026 — 8,560 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,591 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,589 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,582 subscribers7 September 2026 — 8,561 subscribers12 September 2026 — 8,552 subscribers15 September 2026 — 8,532 subscribers5 August 202615 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 41 days, net -48. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,523–8,600 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 18:158,532-20
12 Sept 2026, 00:408,552-9
7 Sept 2026, 23:208,561-21
2 Sept 2026, 17:558,582-7
27 Aug 2026, 20:378,589-2
25 Aug 2026, 01:388,591+31
21 Aug 2026, 05:538,560-3
18 Aug 2026, 09:338,563-4
15 Aug 2026, 16:498,567-4
12 Aug 2026, 09:148,571-9
6 Aug 2026, 03:018,580no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:058,580first reading

Engagement

59 posts held, back to 9 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.57%
avg views ÷ 8,532 subscribers
Avg views / post
731
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 59 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held59 (9 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total1,462
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 16:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
36s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC717 viewsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @mahmudiyaPhoto

Перед вами перевод книги имама Мухаммада Захида аль-Каусари (1879–1952) «Фикх ахли аль-Ирак ва хадисухум». Книга опровергает заблуждения и мифы, окружавшие ханафитский мазхаб в разные времена, как, например, идею о том, что имам Абу Ханифа, рахимахуллах, предпочитал свое мнение хадису, или что некоторые суждения в фикхе устоялись только потому, что до ханафитов не дошли хадисы. Наш учитель — муфтий Биляль — препода

23 Aug 2026, 02:14 UTC≈1,630 viewsread 28 August 2026
Voice message

Вопрос 172 Ас-саламу алейкум ва рахматуЛлахи ва баракатух. Как понимать выражение: "Аллах не в этом мире и не вне этого мира" в ашаритской терминологии и есть ли какие-то доводы указывающие на это выражение??? Джазакаллагьу хайран.

23 Aug 2026, 02:14 UTC≈1,410 viewsread 28 August 2026
Voice message

Вопрос 171 السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته Работа акушерки включает в себя сопровождение роженицы на всем протяжении родов, иногда будет получаться так что я буду пропускать намаз (особенно зимой, так как между намазами короткие промежутки времени) так как на мне будет лежать ответственность за жизнь женщины и ее ребенка, будет ли на мне грех за пропущенный намаз?

23 Aug 2026, 02:13 UTC≈1,200 viewsread 28 August 2026
Voice message

Вопрос 170 Ассаламу алейкум! Если у меня слабый Иман, но я хочу во все столпы веры верить, как мне укрепить свой Иман? Что мне именно делать? В последнее время очень мучаюсь из за этого, боюсь потерять веру, мне нужно укрепить и я это знаю, но я не знаю как , потому что я тоже читаю намаз, читаю и учу Кур’ан но вот постоянно наущения наущения шайтана

23 Aug 2026, 02:12 UTC≈1,080 viewsread 28 August 2026
Voice message

Вопрос 169 Ассаляму ‘Аляйкум Уа РахьматуЛлаhи Уа Баракятуh если пойти к гадалке и поверить в то что она сказала, за это человек впадет в неверие?

23 Aug 2026, 02:11 UTC≈1,040 viewsread 28 August 2026
Voice message

Вопрос 168 Ассаляму алейкум. Я занимаюсь покупкой, ремонтом с последующим перепродажей недвижимости. 1. Как я должен оплатить закат с недвижимости если год не прошел с момента покупки? 2. Должен ли я платит с наличных денег предназначенных для покупки недвижимости? 3. Как высчитать сумму для заката?

23 Aug 2026, 02:11 UTC858 viewsread 28 August 2026
Voice message

Вопрос 167 Ассаляму ‘Алейкум Уа РаhматуЛлаhи Уа Баракятуh У меня такой вопрос. В школьные годы я не знала, что совершение намаза является обязательным. Я думала, что это добровольное поклонение, которое человек совершает по своему желанию. Лишь примерно на первом курсе колледжа я начала изучать ислам, узнала об обязательности намаза и вопросах вероубеждения. До этого, по незнанию, я могла верить в такие вещи, как

23 Aug 2026, 02:10 UTC842 viewsread 28 August 2026
Voice message

Вопрос 166 Согласны вы что в Южной Африке сфера акыды слабая? Как побольше брать пользу шейхов той местности? Потому что есть же разница быть долгое время быть среди алимов и получать от них максимально пользу

23 Aug 2026, 02:10 UTC866 viewsread 28 August 2026
Voice message

Вопрос 165 Ассаламу алейкум, устаз каким тартибом нужно изучать акыду? есть фундамент немного; и еще как это Асарит в акыде? Говорит что это лучше чем саляфиты в наше время; речь одном большом шейхе Иногда совсем путаюсь, некоторые люди говорят необязательно придерживаться только матуридизм илм ашаризм, есть ли дозволенное рамка вне этих школ

23 Aug 2026, 02:09 UTC760 viewsread 28 August 2026
Voice message

Вопрос 164 السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته Подходит ли ханафиту для чтения книга аль-Азкар имама ан-Навави?

23 Aug 2026, 02:08 UTC832 viewsread 28 August 2026
Voice message

Вопрос 163 Ассаламу алейкум ва рахматуллахи ва баракатух, Устаз, люблю вас ради Аллаха, разрешите задать вопрос относительно осознанного намаза: допускается ли для человека, который только начал молиться, после чтения всех слов произносимые на арабском языке (например такбира, чтения Корана , слова прославления Аллаха, ташаххуда и тд.) произносить их перевод и смысл на родном языке, чтобы молящийся лучше понимал см

Showing the 12 most recent of 59 posts we hold for @abualiashari. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

أقوال من ذهب✍
@Thamar21 · 44,507
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Abu Ali al-Ashari” (@abualiashari), 8,532 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/abualiashari.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.