26 measurements spanning 29 days, net +16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,383–15,409 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Sept 2026, 05:20
15,402
+1
2 Sept 2026, 18:17
15,401
+3
1 Sept 2026, 19:47
15,398
-5
31 Aug 2026, 16:34
15,403
-3
30 Aug 2026, 14:48
15,406
+2
29 Aug 2026, 12:53
15,404
+1
28 Aug 2026, 15:26
15,403
-2
27 Aug 2026, 12:43
15,405
+3
26 Aug 2026, 11:36
15,402
+2
24 Aug 2026, 12:16
15,400
-2
22 Aug 2026, 22:05
15,402
-2
21 Aug 2026, 10:05
15,404
+4
20 Aug 2026, 09:34
15,400
+8
19 Aug 2026, 08:36
15,392
-2
18 Aug 2026, 11:34
15,394
+4
17 Aug 2026, 10:06
15,390
-9
15 Aug 2026, 18:47
15,399
+4
14 Aug 2026, 10:28
15,395
-5
13 Aug 2026, 05:14
15,400
+5
12 Aug 2026, 02:22
15,395
first reading
Engagement
49 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.49%
avg views ÷ 15,402 subscribers
Avg views / post
999
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.30%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 49 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held
49 (27 July 2026 – 1 September 2026)
Views total
27,976
Reactions total
364
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 10:50 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2h 03m
Average length
30m 52s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
602 reactions across 49 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
571
94.9%
👍
31
5.15%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 602 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
التعددية الدينية: أصولها الفلسفية، تحليل ونقض | الشيخ الدكتور سعيد فودة
https://youtu.be/6Un389LJxOI
محاضرة قيمة لفضيلة الشيخ الدكتور سعيد فودة حفظه الله تعالى، بعنوان: «التعددية الدينية: أصولها الفلسفية، تحليل ونقض»، ألقاها في المركز الثقافي بمدينة الزرقاء في الأردن، بترتيب مركز دار السعادة وجمعية مثابة الاعتدال للعلوم الشرعية، بتاريخ 22 أغسطس 2026م.
تناول فيها مفهوم التعددية الدينية، وناقش أبرز أصولها ومقدماتها …
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم
مسألة الكافر المجتهد
تحرير المسألة، وبيان ما وقع فيه عبد الناصر حدارة
أولا: صورة المسألة
المسألة قديمة معروفة عند أهل الكلام والأصول، وصورتها أن يقال: إنسان بلغته دعوة الإسلام، فنظر وبحث، ولم ينته به بحثه إلى الإيمان، ومات على ذلك. فهل ينجو يوم القيامة أم لا؟
ثانيا: أمران لا بد من تقريرهما قبل البحث
الأول: أن الحكم في الدنيا غير الحكم في الآخرة. فمن مات على غير الإسلام أجريت عليه أحكام الكفر…
الوجه الثالث: قال البيضاوي عند قوله تعالى (ويحسبون أنهم مهتدون): "يدل على أن الكافر المخطئ والمعاند سواء في استحقاق الذم، وللفارق أن يحمله على المقصر في النظر" أنوار التنزيل.
فكما ترى فإن البيضاوي سوى بين المخطئ والمعاند في استحقاق الذم، وهو أعم من التساوي في استحقاق الخلود، ولا يلزم من ثبوت الأعم ثبوت الأخص. ولكن موضع الشاهد في قول البيضاوي إن من أراد أن يفرق بين المخطئ والمعاند فطريقه أن يحمل المخطئ على المقصر في …
والمقال بني على أن الإجماع محصور في المعاند، فإذا أزيح الإجماع عن المجتهد غير المعاند صار بلا مانع من أن يكون في العفو. فإذا كان المستند هو النص لا الإجماع، لم ينفعه حصر الإجماع في المعاند حتى لو سلمناه له، إذ الحكم في العبارة غير مبني على الإجماع حتى يزول بزواله بل هو مبني على آية الوعيد. وآية الوعيد كما ترى واردة في الكافرين على العموم لا في المعاند بخصوصه، فمن أراد إخراج هذا الإنسان منها فعليه أن يأتي بالمخصص. وأي…
فإذا قصرنا الوعيد على المعاند وحده كما يريد الأخ حدارة فقد أخرجنا من النصوص أكثر من نزلت فيهم، وأبقيناها في النادر القليل.
خامسا: للخصم أن يقول: لا يلزمني إثبات أن البيضاوي قال بالنجاة قطعا، ويكفيني أن المسألة ليست محل إجماع قاطع، وأن فيها قولا معتبرا بالعذر، وأنت بنفسك أثبت الجاحظ والعنبري والبيضاوي. فلا تحول النزاع إلى إجماع لا خلاف فيه.
وجوابه من وجوه:
الأول: أن وجود المخالف غير كاف، بل لا بد أن يكون خلافه معتبرا…
السعادة الأخروية للكافر المجتهد عند الشيخ ابن العربي الحاتمي (2)
الحلقة الثانية في الكشف عن مذهب ابن عربي في الكافر المجتهد، وهو مذهبٌ أخذ في نشره وترويجه بعضُ الحداثيين وبعضُ المتصوّفة المعاصرين، بالكتابة والتدوين والتسجيلات المصوّرة، مع مخالفته للكتاب والسنّة وخرقه لإجماع الأمة.
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1DbR94RkT8/
عُقد يوم أمس في مدينة الزرقاء لقاءٌ علميّ مع فضيلة الدكتور سعيد فودة حول مفهوم "التعددية الدينية"، بحضور جمع من أهل العلم والباحثين والأساتذة الجامعيين وطلاب العلم. وأعقبت المحاضرة جلسة حوارية في معهد دار السعادة، التقى فيها الشيخ بطلاب المعهد.
وقد اشتملت المحاضرة على مسائل دقيقة ونفيسة سننشرها إن شاء الله في أقرب وقت، حيث أكد الشيخ فيها أن الدين الحق عند الله واحد لا يتعدد، واستدل بمجموعة كبيرة من الآيات الكريمة كق…
السعادة الأخروية للكافر المجتهد عند ابن العربي الحاتمي (1)
لماذا خرق ابن العربي الحاتمي الإجماع وقال بنجاة كل من كذّب الله تعالى ورسوله ﷺ إذا نظر واجتهد؟!
https://www.facebook.com/reel/899774809492817/?app=fbl
اليوم إن شاء الله
الدعوة عامّة للطلاب والطالبات
(محاضرة وحوار)
في مدينة الزرقاء
00962790924582
❤8
Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @saaedfudaworks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@saaedfudaworks edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
2 September 2026
Most recent edit
2 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
المكتبة الإسلامية الإلكترونية @IslamicLibrary1 · 40,474 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 30 August 2026
خدمة العلم وأهله @ilim_hizmeti · 32,357 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 5 September 2026
د . أيمن سويد | Dr . Ayman Swaid @Ayman_Swaid · 54,715 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
كتب_مفيدة @kutubunmufidatun · 50,925 Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“أعمال الشيخ سعيد فودة” (@saaedfudaworks), 15,402 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/saaedfudaworks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.