Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 44 days, net -65,588. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 685,557–770,821 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 04:35
695,395
-3,061
16 Sept 2026, 20:17
698,456
-2,790
14 Sept 2026, 19:59
701,246
-2,421
13 Sept 2026, 03:37
703,667
-3,232
11 Sept 2026, 03:40
706,899
-4,047
8 Sept 2026, 07:19
710,946
-5,513
5 Sept 2026, 01:56
716,459
-2,520
3 Sept 2026, 07:47
718,979
-1,697
2 Sept 2026, 04:15
720,676
-1,342
1 Sept 2026, 07:08
722,018
-1,824
31 Aug 2026, 04:57
723,842
-1,558
30 Aug 2026, 08:08
725,400
-1,265
29 Aug 2026, 09:52
726,665
-1,376
28 Aug 2026, 11:04
728,041
-1,845
27 Aug 2026, 09:04
729,886
-572
26 Aug 2026, 11:57
730,458
-1,497
25 Aug 2026, 13:22
731,955
-1,533
24 Aug 2026, 15:08
733,488
-3,096
22 Aug 2026, 20:45
736,584
-2,389
21 Aug 2026, 10:47
738,973
first reading
Engagement
190 posts held, back to 16 June 2024 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.289%
avg views ÷ 695,395 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,010
147 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
150
of 190 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 September 2026
Posts held
190 (16 June 2024 – 19 September 2026)
Views total
295,550
Reactions total
36,602
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
20 Sept 2026, 09:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
89
Videos
33
Links
27
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
46m 45s
Average length
1m 14s
Measured directly from 38 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
37,537 reactions across 150 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
17,969
47.9%
❤
8,750
23.3%
🔥
8,371
22.3%
🎉
2,359
6.28%
⚡
78
0.208%
🤔
5
0.013%
🤩
2
0.005%
🏆
1
0.003%
😢
1
0.003%
🤝
1
0.003%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 151 of the 190 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37,537 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 190 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2024 to 19 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
اکانت پشتیبانیمون داره منفجر میشه اول صبح شنبه که کسی حوصله دنیا رو نداره )))
دوستان صبور باشید تا پشتیبان های ما تک تک جواب میدن 💪🧿
دیدید یه تعداد کانال ها دو دقیقه الکی لینک میزارن بعد پاک میکنن میگن ظرفیت پر شده ))!! خوب نشون بده یه مدرکی چیزی !
@aiarefai
و طبق آمار رسمی که امروز از گمرک بدستم رسیده اینه که روزانه میانگین ۱۰۰۰ دستگاه خودروی لوکس از امارات وارد ایران میشه! یعنی در شرایط جنگی که الان در ایران حاکمه خیلی ها دارند خوب پول درمیارن !!
دیروز یکی از دوستای من که بزرگترین چاپخونه ی شمالغرب کشور رو داره یه لامبورگینی سیاه تحویلش دادن!
@aiarefai
صبح با انرژی همگی بخیر ✅
من صبح ها خودمو میزنم به دیوونگی و فقط سعی می کنم از چند ساعت قبل از شروع کار لذت ببرم …!
مطمئن باش اگه مشکلات امروزتو نداشتی و دهنتو سرویس نمیکردن مغزت روز به روز یه قسمتیشو از دست میده … و اینم بدون اگه استرس داشته باشی بازم مغز از بین میره .
پس اینو بدون که تو همین شرایط ایرانش صد ها هزار نفر دارند پول درمیارند، آرامش دارند ، میرن مسافرت و غیره..!
فقط با بگایی های زندگیت دوست شو و یکی …
⚠️ هیچ وقت این کارارو نکنید دوستان!
مطمين باشید برای من سوده چون رفرال من میشه ولی هدف اول من اینه که ایرانی جماعت درس سرمایه گذاری رو یاد بگیره!! و دید قمار گونه رو به بازار های مالی نداشته باشه!
ایشون اگه ۱۰ هزار دلار هم از تایم ترید دربیاره با این دید همون پول رو میبره یه جا دیگه به باد میده!
@aiarefai
اسرائیل تایمز گفته برای جنگ های آینده 3 میلیارد دلار بمب خریدیم! از طرفی یادش رفته که ایران فقط از امارات و قطر و بحرین و کویت نفری ۱۰-۲۰ میلیارد دلار غرامت گرفته )))
فقط با خودم میگم که حیف این پولا که میشد خرج خاورمیانه ای مدرن بشه ولی خرج موشک میشه میره زیر کوه ها خاک میخوره ...!
@aiarefai
یه عکس زیر خالی پیدا کردم از جشنواره کن فرانسه که ۵ سال پیش رفته بودم و با Garyvee کارآفرین معروف آمریکایی که تو اینستا ویديو هاش پره پیدا کردم ...!
با اینکه خیلی ها دورش بودن ولی وقتی دو تا جوون ساده ایرانی دید اومد پیشمون و باهامون صحبت کرد ( چون خانم ایشون هم ایرانی هستند) و درس فروتنی بهمون داد.
@aiarefai
و به مرحله ای رسیدیم که تعداد از تریدر هایی که بساط پکیج فروشی و سیگنال فروشیون رو کساد کردیم شروع کردن اینور اونور که مگه میشه همچین سیستمی باشه و کلاه برداریه ... ))
الان وقت آزاد دارید تا میتونید اینور اونور کامنت منفی بزارید ولی آقا آخرش چی دیگه خودتون هم میایید سمت ترید با هوش مصنوعی!!!
@aiarefai
صبح همگی بخیر .
امروز گویا پرواز های مبدا و مقصد به ایران رو تعطیل کردند و اینبار علتش تحریم بوده نه جنگ!
از یه طرف شروع کردند حساب بانکی ایرانیای خارج از کشور رو میبندند. ( این همه دانشجو هست )
و هر کی که ملیتش ایرانیه یعنی باید بره بمیره ...!
ما ۴۰-۵۰ ساله تحریم هستیم ... به کنار ولی واقعا اینا با ایرانی مشکل دارند یا با حکومت ؟
نمیخوام اول صبحی انرژی ملت رو بیارم پایین ولی همیشه اینو با خودتون بگید که ما بخاط…
سایت بانک مسکن از دسترس خارج شد! چند روز پیش سامانه ثبت شرکت اصلا کار نمیکرد! بانک مهر کلا سیستم پرداختیش مشکل داره! سازمان مالیات کشور اصلا وارد پنل کاربری نمیشه ! و غیره
واقعا حل کردن این زیر ساخت ها الان با کمک هوش مصنوعی کار چند روزه کاریه ! آخه تو این مملکت هیچ کی کار نمیکنه و کارشو درست انجام نمیده یعنی !! همه چی خراب همه چی تعطیل . چیزایی که پول میگیرن یه مقدار بهتر کار میکنه فقط!
دیگه داره سال ۲۰۲۷ …
صبح بخیر ✅ 📈
به هیچ وجه بیت کوین و اتریوم نخرید برای بلند مدت که هوش مصنوعی قاتل بزرگ بازار کریپتو خواهد بود ( مگر اینکه ترامپ باز دستکاری بکنه )
@aiarefai
👍106
Showing the 12 most recent of 190 posts we hold for @aiarefai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@aiarefai edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
17 August 2026
Most recent edit
23 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
کلینیک سلامت با دستگاه های مدرن جوانسازی و Bioage12%
فروش قسطی تتر - طلا و املاک14%
نمایندگی خودروی Hongqi چینی در ایران2%
هیچکدام16%
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 190 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2024 to 19 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@aiarefai named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@airefai named in 1 post, 18 September 2026 – 18 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
فرصت های ۱۰۰x @xcrypto100x · 882,645 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
$1 per Kill - Monocraft @monocraftlive · 2,296,571 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 8 August 2026
Timetrade @timetradedex · 1,185,930 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
Timeless @timelessreels · 1,248,759 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 August 2026
Tronkeeper Withdrawals @tronkeeperlogs · 170,485 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
هوش مصنوعی با آتار @atarappai · 873,841 Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
2 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“هوش مصنوعی با عارف” (@aiarefai), 695,395 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aiarefai.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.