Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
22 measurements spanning 91 days, net -107. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,577–6,795 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 03:50
6,602
-10
3 Nov 2026, 12:10
6,612
-5
28 Oct 2026, 07:20
6,617
-6
25 Oct 2026, 00:46
6,623
-6
22 Oct 2026, 07:18
6,629
-8
18 Oct 2026, 19:45
6,637
-11
16 Oct 2026, 05:37
6,648
-7
13 Oct 2026, 06:27
6,655
-9
7 Oct 2026, 10:17
6,664
-15
30 Sept 2026, 07:21
6,679
-49
15 Sept 2026, 20:19
6,728
-9
12 Sept 2026, 03:37
6,737
-19
7 Sept 2026, 13:38
6,756
-14
30 Aug 2026, 17:07
6,770
+14
27 Aug 2026, 11:49
6,756
-1
24 Aug 2026, 04:13
6,757
+10
20 Aug 2026, 12:48
6,747
+4
17 Aug 2026, 20:26
6,743
+15
14 Aug 2026, 12:47
6,728
+11
11 Aug 2026, 04:16
6,717
first reading
Engagement
40 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.0%
avg views ÷ 6,602 subscribers
Avg views / post
795
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.69%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 40 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
40 (30 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
13,508
Reactions total
352
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 03:49 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,930
Videos
≈359
Links
≈475
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
5m 03s
Average length
51s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
851 reactions across 37 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
301
35.4%
🔥
221
26.0%
❤
79
9.28%
😁
72
8.46%
💯
50
5.88%
👎
45
5.29%
👏
40
4.70%
🎉
20
2.35%
custom 5449394813709327952
8
0.94%
😱
7
0.823%
🤔
5
0.588%
🤓
3
0.353%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 851 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 17 posts held from the last 30 days (5.88%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
1️⃣Ты просыпаешься без ощущения «меня сбила электричка»
⠀
Тренировки идут, но не выносят тебя из жизни. Это не всегда легко, но уже не мучительно.
⠀
2️⃣Тренировки вписываются в ритм жизни, а не рушат его
⠀
Бег - не источник стресса, а часть системы. Не «ещё одна обязаловка», а штука, которая тебя поддерживает.
⠀
3️⃣Ты не гоняешься за скоростью на каждой пробежке
⠀
Ты понял, что лёгкий бег инструмент, а не твоя слабос…
О беговых неудачах и о том, почему они не перечёркивают весь ваш прогресс, поговорили.
Теперь пора поговорить о том, что важно не только замечать, когда что-то идёт не так, но и вовремя видеть, когда всё складывается хорошо.
И нет, речь не обязательно о новых личных рекордах и рекордных темпах. Иногда прогресс проявляется совсем в других вещах: менее очевидных, но не менее важных.
Собрали 7 сигналов, которые подс…
Неудачи в беге случаются у всех. Вопрос не в том, как сделать так, чтобы их никогда не было, а в том, что делать после.
Делимся небольшим фрагментом урока с курса «ПРО осмысленный бег и тренерство».
В видео — алгоритм работы с неудачей.
P.s. в феврале 2027 стартует юбилейный 30-й поток курса «ПРО осмысленный бег и тренерство»
Но прямо сейчас вы уже можете понять, насколько вы готовы к профессии тренера бегунов люб…
В беге не всегда получается так, как мы задумали.
Можно несколько месяцев готовиться к марафону и не выбежать желаемое время. Можно на тренировке не справиться с темпом, который ещё недавно казался вполне комфортным. Можно пропустить старт из-за болезни или травмы.
А иногда: просто потерять мотивацию и обнаружить, что бег больше не приносит привычного удовольствия.
И всё это тоже часть бегового пути.
Особенно обид…
Кажется, у многих бегунов есть свой способ справляться с жизненными проблемами: надеть кроссовки и выйти на пробежку😅
Поссорился с кем-то? Побежал. Завал на работе? Побежал. В голове миллион мыслей, и все одновременно…?
Ну, вы поняли:)
И это не просто беговое суеверие. У бега действительно есть вполне научно объяснимый эффект на наше психологическое состояние.
Что происходит с головой, когда мы бегаем?
Стресса с…
Почему одни выходят на пробежку с самого утра, а другие откладывают тренировку до вечера? 🏃♂️
У каждого на это есть свои причины и предпочтения.
Мы выделили 5 основных факторов, которые влияют на выбор времени для бега.
А теперь интересно узнать ваше мнение 👇
Напишите в комментариях номер фактора, который вам ближе всего, или поделитесь своей причиной, почему выбираете именно это время для пробежек 💬
У каждого бегуна есть своё идеальное время для пробежки
Одни предпочитают начинать день с бега 🌅
Другие выходят на тренировку ближе к вечеру 🌇
А к какой команде относитесь вы?
👍🏻 — бегаю по утрам
👎🏻 — предпочитаю вечерние пробежки
Давайте проверим, кого среди нас больше😎
Сегодня — День тренера!
Поздравляем всех, кто помогает другим становиться сильнее, ставить цели и находить свой путь в спорте.
Не забудьте сказать «Спасибо» своим тренерам за знания, поддержку, терпение и умение быть рядом не только в дни личных рекордов, но и тогда, когда что-то не получается.
И отдельный привет всем нашим тренерам, выпускникам и студентам, которые помогают другим полюбить бег и двигаться вперёд.…
Беговой октябрь: собрали самое интересное за месяц 🏃🏻🍂
Как сохранять мотивацию, не выпадать из тренировок из-за простуды, подготовиться к зимнему бегу и даже задуматься о тренерстве? В октябре мы обсудили много тем, которые пригодятся и начинающим, и опытным бегунам.
Собрали пять материалов октября, которые могут пригодиться вам в тренировках и не только:
🏃 Про прогресс и дисциплину
Как не терять направление и про…
Отдыхать тоже нужно уметь.
Особенно если хочется бегать долго и получать от этого удовольствие.
Сохраняйте три способа восстановиться после усталости от тренировок — и делитесь постом с друзьями, которым сейчас тоже не помешает передышка🏃♀️
Что делать, если устал от тренировок?
Осенью такое случается особенно часто: дни становятся короче, на улице холоднее, вставать на пробежку по утрам всё сложнее.
И это нормально, мотивация не обязана быть одинаковой круглый год.
Юрий Строфилов говорит просто: «Когда устал от тренировок, нужно отдохнуть».
Но отдохнуть можно несколькими способами.
Разобрали три варианта — смотрите в следующем посте 👇
👏3
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @akademys10run. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А много ли среди вас тех, кто всё-таки ставит перед собой цель «марафон из 3-х»?
У меня такая цель ✋🏻🎯34%
Я уже достиг этого результата🥇5%
Не гонюсь за марафоном из 3-х👌🏼61%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
7 Стартов - канал для влюбленных в спорт @startov7 · 18,861 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 October 2026
WR - Онлайн Забеги и Сообщество Бегунов @worldrun_online · 21,093 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 26 September 2026
Бегать просто @runforhealth · 131,813 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 29 August 2026
Журнал «Марафонец» @marathonecmagazine · 40,906 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Академия бега S10.run” (@akademys10run), 6,602 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/akademys10run.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.