Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Акроним!

Channel

Акроним!

@akronimfc

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,125subscribers

+19 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002181044099
TypeChannel
Username@akronimfc
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/akronimfc

Growth

2,1062,1252,115.56 August 2026 — 2,106 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,107 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,109 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,112 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,119 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,122 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,123 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,121 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,123 subscribers6 September 2026 — 2,125 subscribers6 August 20266 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 31 days, net +19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,103–2,128 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 18:412,125+2
30 Aug 2026, 03:162,123+2
26 Aug 2026, 18:242,121-2
23 Aug 2026, 19:362,123+1
19 Aug 2026, 19:412,122+3
16 Aug 2026, 16:042,119+7
13 Aug 2026, 01:342,112+3
9 Aug 2026, 16:032,109+2
6 Aug 2026, 11:102,107+1
6 Aug 2026, 06:492,106first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 37s
Average length
1m 39s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

217 reactions across 18 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10548.4%
😁219.68%
💯209.22%
🔥177.83%
🤣177.83%
👍94.15%
🤮73.23%
🤡52.30%
❤‍🔥31.38%
👎31.38%
👏20.922%
💩20.922%
😱20.922%
💋10.461%
🤔10.461%
🤝10.461%
🤯10.461%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 233 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:50 UTC160 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @elapelsinoPhoto

На этой неделе записали эфир «Фан-зоны» с Ромой Гуськовым (автором каналов «Привет со дна» и «Акроним») Обсудили, как начали сезон «Крылья Советов» и «Акрон». Посмотреть можно по ссылке👇 🎦: https://vk.ru/wall-212697722_14929

6👍3🔥2🤝1🤡1

5 Aug 2026, 07:32 UTC510 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Еще вчера спросил гендиректора, может ли клуб что-то сделать с матчами в будний день в 17:15 Ответ был «Вещатель важнее» — оцените мою операторскую работу в конце!

😁9🔥51

5 Aug 2026, 06:47 UTC481 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @shareofluck

Константин Клюшев: За игру «Акрона» стыдно, тут не может быть двух мнений После вчерашнего матча с «Ростовом» игроки тольяттинской команды пообщались с болельщиками, а на вопросы в миксте вместо них ответил генеральный директор клуба: – Тут двух мнений быть не может. За игру в действительности стыдно. Прежде всего, за командную игру. После матча собрали лидеров, собрали тренерский штаб, поговорили с ребятами. Поним

💯61

4 Aug 2026, 15:48 UTC904 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Благоевич: мы вышли, как будто вообще не тренировались. Это будто не та команда, с которой я работал. Не помню, когда последний раз говорил, что мне стыдно. Не можем сравнивать эту игру с предыдущими. Хочу извиниться перед болельщиками. У меня нет объяснений

20

4 Aug 2026, 15:29 UTC≈1,830 views55 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

⚡️🔥ЖЕСТКИЙ РАЗГОВОР ФАНАТОВ «Акрона» с игроками после 0:4 от «Ростова»: «Марат, вы че творите, #####?! Три гола себе привезли! Последняя победа дома 19 ноября!!!» Видео: «Акроним!»

27💯14🔥9👏2🤣2🤯1

4 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC847 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Обращайтесь! (нет) А первые 4 мяча пропустил Серега Волков…

🤔1

4 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTC756 viewsread 7 August 2026

Наконец-то Меткалов добрался до мяча после очередного навеса, но пробить четко не вышло 🤷‍♂️

4 Aug 2026, 13:57 UTC728 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Базилевский уходит, хромая 😢 Вместо него сикс-севен — Никита Платон!

11❤‍🔥3💋1

4 Aug 2026, 13:41 UTC626 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

«СИЛЬНО БЛЯЯЯЯЯ» — охарактеризовал Джонатан Альба начало матча в исполнении его команды

😁5

4 Aug 2026, 13:29 UTC616 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Пиздарики, третий матч подряд начинать с 0:2 — и это оказывается с Зенитом и Рубином еще долго держались

😱2

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @akronimfc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ПФК «Крылья Советов»
@fckssamara_official · 37,726
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Акроним!” (@akronimfc), 2,125 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/akronimfc.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.