Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Уголок Эля // elapelsino

Channel

Уголок Эля // elapelsino

@elapelsino

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

251subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002234678897
TypeChannel
Username@elapelsino
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/elapelsino

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2502622567 August 2026 — 250 subscribers8 August 2026 — 250 subscribers16 August 2026 — 262 subscribers24 August 2026 — 258 subscribers30 August 2026 — 255 subscribers10 September 2026 — 254 subscribers18 September 2026 — 251 subscribers2517 August 202618 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 42 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 248–264 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 06:55251-3
10 Sept 2026, 05:18254-1
30 Aug 2026, 22:06255-3
24 Aug 2026, 00:25258-4
16 Aug 2026, 08:53262+12
8 Aug 2026, 09:32250no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:58250first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

68 reactions across 16 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2739.7%
🔥1014.7%
👍710.3%
🤝57.35%
🤔45.88%
🤣45.88%
👏22.94%
😈22.94%
🥴22.94%
🎉11.47%
👎11.47%
💔11.47%
💩11.47%
🥱11.47%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC≈1,370 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

На этой неделе записали эфир «Фан-зоны» с Ромой Гуськовым (автором каналов «Привет со дна» и «Акроним») Обсудили, как начали сезон «Крылья Советов» и «Акрон». Посмотреть можно по ссылке👇 🎦: https://vk.ru/wall-212697722_14929

🔥32🤣1

4 Aug 2026, 17:42 UTC86 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Тем временем «Крылья Советов» продолжают приятно удивлять. Есть первая победа в сезоне (и первая над махачкалинским Динамо в основное время), пусть пока и в Кубке.

5🤝3

4 Aug 2026, 14:55 UTC158 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

По-моему очевидно, что что-то идет не так. Тренерский штаб ставит игру, которую футболисты показать тупо не могут. Или они уже сейчас сливают тренера, потому такие ошибки по-другому и оправдать сложно. Не может профессиональный игрок выступать так, как играют футболисты «Акрона». В любом случае нужно как можно скорее избавить от Благоевича и найти «пастуха», который быстренько поставит «бей, беги» с выносами подал

3👏2🤝2

4 Aug 2026, 14:51 UTC84 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @vyshetribun

❤️Срджан Благоевич в «Акроне» (РПЛ + Кубок России): 3 матча/ 0/0/3 Забитые/пропущенные — 1/11 @vyshetribun

🤔2

4 Aug 2026, 14:48 UTC89 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Вопросы к Тереховскому были и раньше. Но сейчас их стало куда больше. Игнат (как и вся команда) вообще не тянет уровень

1

4 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC96 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Как думаете, через сколько матчей выгонят Благоевича? Может, уже пора, пока не поздно?🤔

🤔1

4 Aug 2026, 13:26 UTC86 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

«Акрон» ужаснее от матча к матча. А, Кубок же не нужен, точно. Можно выключать и не тратить нервы.

3

1 Aug 2026, 16:28 UTC115 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

«Крылья Советов» Булатова прекрасны. А «Акрону» бы сначала сменить защиту (желательно всю), а потом можно пытаться играть в футбол.

6💔1

1 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTC126 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Уже не 0:5! «Акрон» потихоньку набирает форму. Главное подойди в оптимальных кондициях к играм с прямыми конкурентами по турнирной таблице. https://t.me/fcakron/20384

🤣3🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 15:10 UTC108 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Олды голосуют за Катю First. Именно с ее песней у меня в детстве ассоциировались «Крылья Советов» и Металлург. https://t.me/fckssamara_official/38200

2👍1

31 Jul 2026, 14:50 UTC119 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вчера я мог собрать для вас контент с «Акроном» из Тольятти. Но суд над Тарховой, куда меня и отправили, был важнее. Поэтому вот вам кадры 759-ого (или хз какого) заседания. Зря чтоли ездил? Интересный факт. В третий раз я приехал на заседание по делу Тарховой и в первый раз его не отменили!

🤔1

30 Jul 2026, 07:36 UTC100 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Иронично, ведь прямо сейчас нахожусь в суде)

🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @elapelsino. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Уголок Эля // elapelsino” (@elapelsino), 251 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elapelsino.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.