Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
64 measurements spanning 95 days, net -443. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,375–21,950 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 22:59
21,441
-6
7 Nov 2026, 18:29
21,447
-5
6 Nov 2026, 17:35
21,452
-11
5 Nov 2026, 17:05
21,463
-7
4 Nov 2026, 13:36
21,470
-7
3 Nov 2026, 13:19
21,477
-8
2 Nov 2026, 15:16
21,485
-3
1 Nov 2026, 13:00
21,488
-3
31 Oct 2026, 12:49
21,491
-7
30 Oct 2026, 10:37
21,498
-4
29 Oct 2026, 07:55
21,502
-2
28 Oct 2026, 02:45
21,504
-2
27 Oct 2026, 03:27
21,506
-6
26 Oct 2026, 02:20
21,512
-6
25 Oct 2026, 02:40
21,518
-8
24 Oct 2026, 00:29
21,526
-9
22 Oct 2026, 21:39
21,535
-10
21 Oct 2026, 20:40
21,545
-3
20 Oct 2026, 19:06
21,548
-4
19 Oct 2026, 21:18
21,552
first reading
Engagement
26 posts held, back to 9 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 81 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
67.3%
avg views ÷ 21,441 subscribers
Avg views / post
14,400
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.65%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 26 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held
26 (9 June 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total
86,630
Reactions total
4,893
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Nov 2026, 03:05 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
532
Videos
407
Links
65
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
5m 16s
Average length
45s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
17,372 reactions across 26 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
5,168
29.7%
😁
3,103
17.9%
🔥
2,906
16.7%
❤🔥
2,866
16.5%
😢
1,241
7.14%
🤩
531
3.06%
👍
461
2.65%
🫡
458
2.64%
🥰
218
1.25%
😈
149
0.858%
👻
81
0.466%
👀
75
0.432%
😍
75
0.432%
👏
36
0.207%
😘
4
0.023%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17,372 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
496
across the posts below
Posts paid on
20
of 26 we hold a reading for · 77%
Most on one post
68
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @alexterribleofficial. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 26 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 June 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Черные птицы слетают с луны,
Черные птицы - кошмарные сны.
Кружатся, кружатся в синюю ночь
Ищут повсюду мою дочь.
Возьмите мое золото,
Возьмите мое золото,
Возьмите мое золото
И улетайте обратно.
Нам не нужно твое золото,
Нам не нужно твое золото,
Заржавело твое золото
И повсюду на нем пятна.
Черные птицы из детских глаз
Выклюют черным клювом алмаз.
Алмаз унесут в черных когтях,
Оставив в глазах черный угольный страх…
Это у моего друга Темыча, который мне чарджер 69 года делает. Он живет во Флориде в часе езды от меня, и у него буквально там целый зоопарк. Черепаха если, которую ты тронешь тебя в тюрьму посадят, медведь, всякие дикие большие кошки там ходят 😁 кстати именно из за Темы я выбрал переехать во Флориду. Он мне с самого начала со всем помогал. И Сильвию кстати он мне черную
Привез из Японии. Я ее продал уже, но не суть. …
Всегда хотел понять прикол гелика. Ну купил. Ну поездил. Ну вроде круто, но все равно по мне дак выглядит как сапог. Еще и дорогущий сапог. И тут я увидел крузак 250. У нас это прадик. Раз посидел. Два посидел. Купил. Поставил офф роад колеса. Ну мечта ! Мой конь ! Обожаю каждую его деталь, каждую линию. Не едет только сцука нихуя! Ну и хер с ним ! За то квадрат прям какой надо ! Гелик отдыхает как по мне. Только не …
Сегодня скончался один мой знакомый человек. Он был молодым и сильным парнем. У него остались маленький ребенок и жена. Очередное напоминание, что у тебя нет времени друг мой. Ни у кого из нас
Мы сыграли 4 шоу с Three6Mafia в нашем туре. Dj Paul очень круто мужик ! Их музыка занимает самое почетное место в моем сердце, и для меня было честью, разделить с ними сцену в нашем туре ! Круто ! Мы встретимся с ним снова через пару недель на фестивале aftershock , где мы будем играть с Limp Bizkit, wu tang clan, suicide boys, cypress hill и многими другими ребятами
Еще я записал Кавер. Даже не один. Три штуки, один пока выложил на ютуб. Отдохнув от тура повти два месяца, я понял, что после тура, мне нужно минимум месяц, что бы просто психологически восстановится, не говоря уже о теле, и травм после боя. Туры очень сильно меня эмоционально и физиологически изматывают, по этому я не пилю много контента в последнее время. Но в след году я хочу вернуться как бы в прошлое, и начать …
Работаю над смертником. Будет 3 варианта с разными масками. Еще хочу сделать кольцо и еще кое что. Скоро покажу. Раньше кольца продавались очень хорошо и люди их просят обратно. Я решил добавить еще и смертники, сам буду носить с удовольствием. Круто получается
❤🔥361🔥115❤54👍18😈7👏5🤩5🫡2
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @alexterribleofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
СВОЯ КУЛЬТУРА @svoya_kultura · 25,279 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 25 September 2026
Wildways @wildwaysofficial · 20,289 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
2 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Grizzly (альбом)(ru.wikipedia.org) “…хотят сделать клип. Трек называется «Rodina»{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/alexterribleofficial/677|title=Alex Terrible|website=telegramm|access-da…” read 8 November 2026
Slaughter to Prevail(ru.wikipedia.org) “…полностью готов. Релиз альбома планируется к июлю{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/alexterribleofficial/796|title=Alex Terrible|website=Telegram|access-dat…” read 1 November 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Alex Terrible” (@alexterribleofficial), 21,441 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alexterribleofficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.