Video message, posted without a caption
custom 53707402873437023287custom 53709244941960563575
Signed Semyon Gafarov

Channel
@deaddogs_barking
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
7,348subscribers
+75 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001356900396 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @deaddogs_barking |
| Description | Творческое объединение, рассказывающее о релизах из музыкального андеграунда. Авторские рецензии, рекомендации хорошей музыки, плейлисты и тематические ролики. Мы как СМИ: https://muz.lc/deaddogsbarking Мы как лейбл: https://band.link/DDBlabel |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 23 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/deaddogs_barking |
Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 08:06 | 7,348 | +5 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 23:55 | 7,343 | -4 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 14:05 | 7,347 | -2 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 07:46 | 7,349 | -2 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 21:56 | 7,351 | +1 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 21:05 | 7,350 | +1 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 06:06 | 7,349 | +7 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 20:07 | 7,342 | +8 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 21:00 | 7,334 | +2 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 13:59 | 7,332 | +2 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 05:39 | 7,330 | -2 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:21 | 7,332 | -61 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 00:40 | 7,393 | -34 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:08 | 7,427 | -11 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 7,438 | +13 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 7,425 | +163 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 7,262 | +8 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 19:22 | 7,254 | +6 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:22 | 7,248 | -4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 7,252 | first reading |
146 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 46 of 47 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 146 (1 August 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 49,440 |
| Reactions total | 860 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 02:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,504 reactions across 133 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5370924494196056357 | 1,231 | 49.2% | |
| custom 5370740287343702328 | 595 | 23.8% | |
| custom 5370605713133412674 | 426 | 17.0% | |
| custom 5370598007962083530 | 252 | 10.1% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 142 of the 146 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,682 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 146 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 48 posts held from the last 30 days (4.17%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 53707402873437023287custom 53709244941960563575
Signed Semyon Gafarov
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 53707402873437023285custom 53709244941960563575
Signed Semyon Gafarov
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 53709244941960563574custom 53707402873437023283
Signed Semyon Gafarov
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 53707402873437023286custom 53709244941960563572custom 53705980079620835301
Signed Semyon Gafarov
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 53709244941960563575custom 53706057131334126741
Signed Semyon Gafarov
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 53705980079620835304custom 53709244941960563573
Signed Semyon Gafarov
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 53709244941960563577custom 53707402873437023284
Signed Semyon Gafarov
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 537074028734370232810custom 53709244941960563575custom 53705980079620835304
Signed Semyon Gafarov
Немного кружочков с предпрослушивания сборника на стихи Есенина, который выходит уже через неделю
custom 53706057131334126743custom 53709244941960563572
Signed Semyon Gafarov
Кто здесь батя? Hatebreed вернулись спустя 6 лет с 9-й по счёту пластинкой. Как и ожидалось, старички жанра не изменили себе, выдав 11 бронебойных треков не только для хардкорщиков, но и фанатов Slayer. Думается мне, смена лейбла положительно повлияла на атмосферу в коллективе, отчего даже череда не самых хороших событий не смогла помешать группе выдать крепкий релиз, — и это спустя 30 лет карьеры. Однозначно, за те…
custom 53709244941960563578custom 53705980079620835302custom 53707402873437023281
Signed Semyon Gafarov
Где-то между Киото и Екатеринбургом. Год назад мы рассказывали о проекте sotode 外で, который решил совместить уральский шугейз с воздушной эстетикой и японским колоритом. За это время группа изрядно пошумела в совершенно разных местах (ребят даже хвалили в проекте «Риса за творчество», где разбирают преимущественно хип-хоп-музыку) и наконец-то представила дебютный мини-альбом. Всего 4 композиции, но каждая из них не…
custom 537092449419605635723custom 53706057131334126747custom 53707402873437023287
Signed Semyon Gafarov
Вошли и вышли, приключение на 20 минут. Ценители панчовых треков на две минуты, ликуйте — вышел второй альбом шведов thrown. Одиннадцать треков, суммарно около двадцати минут — парни по-прежнему не верят в долгие вступления и прощания, предпочитая им формулу Emmure. Да и грех носы воротить, когда эта формула до сих пор работает как часы, предлагая за короткий промежуток максимум тяжести и прокача. VK | Яндекс.Музы…
custom 537059800796208353013custom 53706057131334126744
Signed Semyon Gafarov
Showing the 12 most recent of 146 posts we hold for @deaddogs_barking. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@deaddogs_barking edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что будем слушать 6 ноября?
The shares total 207%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Что будем слушать 30 октября?
The shares total 177%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Что будем слушать 28 августа?
The shares total 223%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Что будем слушать 14 августа?
The shares total 206%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Что будем слушать 7 августа?
The shares total 160%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 146 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 55 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 33 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“мертвых собак лай” (@deaddogs_barking), 7,348 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/deaddogs_barking.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.