Channel
@alfkzzn
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
242subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001609494963 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alfkzzn |
| Created | 27 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alfkzzn |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 11:15 | 242 | -2 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 07:16 | 244 | +2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 242 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:54 | 245 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:00 | 246 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:01 | 246 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
180 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5247073417089268336 | 61 | 33.9% | |
| custom 5235734531629129786 | 41 | 22.8% | |
| 😁 | 25 | 13.9% | |
| custom 5255776979336049312 | 21 | 11.7% | |
| 😱 | 17 | 9.44% | |
| custom 5247179949458077781 | 11 | 6.11% | |
| custom 5199563992099465281 | 4 | 2.22% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 180 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @alfkzzn. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 June 2026 to 25 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
В прошлом году весной было красивое цветение 🌼 А в этом году я его не застала, т.к. была не в Казани х) Позирует @Kris_x_akuma
custom 524707341708926833619custom 52357345316291297868custom 52557769793360493127
Подготовка к завтрашней съемке идет полным ходом 🥳 Снова еду в Йошку поснимать подружек ❤️
custom 523573453162912978617custom 52470734170892683365
Связала новую приблуду 🐸
😁25custom 52557769793360493128
Впервые была на корпоративе такого масштаба ✨ я думала, такое только в фильмах бывает. Самое интересное, конечно, осталось за кадром, т.к. было не до телефон ахах Такое лето мне нравится 👌
custom 524707341708926833619custom 52357345316291297867
Не иронично, ночевала вчера на работе 😂 Офис находится прямо напротив театра Камала, так что у нас не было шансов вернуться домой на транспорте, а пешком идти не хотелось. Спасибо, что на работе есть условия для сна 🙏
😱17custom 51995639920994652814
Но есть одно НО Пару месяцев назад я осознала, что косплей мне уже не приносит таких эмоций, как раньше... А на фестивалях я больше чувствую дискомфорт, чем удовольствие. Поэтому на последних для себя фестивалях я уходила сразу после выступления. В общем, я ещё рефлексирую на данную тему... 🪐 П.с. кстати, это коснулось также и фотографии. Так что расходимся, товарищи 😌
custom 524717994945807778111custom 52357345316291297869
Смотрите, какой жених 😎 Положила на Флинса глаз почти сразу, как он вышел в игре. Заказала его ещё в январе, и вот, наконец, состоялась примерка! Приятно поражаюсь, что мы живём в такое время, когда супер качественный и детализированный костюм можно заказать за недорогие деньги 🤌 (в сравнении с ручной работой). (А мы-то 15 лет назад на себе на глаз собирали костюмы, крафт из подручных средств делали... Помню, как п…
custom 524707341708926833618custom 52557769793360493126
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @alfkzzn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Alf.ph | Косплей фотограф Казань” (@alfkzzn), 242 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alfkzzn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.