объединяем поп-культуру и фэшн. системно. FF2F
Официальный сайт — www.zagonbrand.com
Тех. поддержка — @ZAGON_MANAGER
Чат канала — https://t.me/+43dhGOGgXQVjNzdi
Created
Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
62 measurements spanning 93 days, net +294. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,753–31,300 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 14:05
30,637
-29
6 Nov 2026, 14:44
30,666
-12
5 Nov 2026, 15:50
30,678
-40
4 Nov 2026, 13:20
30,718
-42
3 Nov 2026, 13:50
30,760
-24
2 Nov 2026, 15:40
30,784
-82
1 Nov 2026, 16:07
30,866
-81
31 Oct 2026, 14:48
30,947
-174
30 Oct 2026, 12:09
31,121
+288
29 Oct 2026, 10:15
30,833
+1
28 Oct 2026, 08:06
30,832
-9
27 Oct 2026, 10:59
30,841
-7
26 Oct 2026, 11:56
30,848
+2
24 Oct 2026, 10:45
30,846
+12
23 Oct 2026, 09:49
30,834
+15
22 Oct 2026, 11:57
30,819
+17
21 Oct 2026, 07:28
30,802
+91
20 Oct 2026, 02:21
30,711
+307
19 Oct 2026, 00:57
30,404
+4
17 Oct 2026, 22:08
30,400
first reading
Engagement
78 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 158 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
30.6%
avg views ÷ 30,637 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,390
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 78 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
78 (19 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
178,340
Reactions total
3,415
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 00:06 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,360
Videos
≈214
Links
≈1,150
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
12m 16s
Average length
1m 01s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
12,019 reactions across 76 posts, in 45 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5328014489554002336
2,742
22.8%
custom 5319066444883828666
1,315
10.9%
custom 5318778819513950243
1,272
10.6%
custom 5399888628358855518
1,082
9.00%
custom 5372827061628977572
607
5.05%
custom 5463112217698246296
565
4.70%
custom 5213305508034783384
479
3.99%
custom 5370645480235615604
400
3.33%
custom 5264961689589137336
366
3.05%
custom 5235624876819098821
309
2.57%
custom 5825534997087391628
244
2.03%
custom 5318773107207447403
213
1.77%
custom 5429169829892359159
192
1.60%
custom 5454109785857205810
178
1.48%
custom 5778449541204285011
160
1.33%
custom 5264853778535824339
159
1.32%
custom 5400105756135536934
156
1.30%
custom 5359583517086853044
139
1.16%
custom 5442741651669795615
129
1.07%
custom 5296483279208209348
126
1.05%
25 further kinds
1,186
9.87%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 76 of the 78 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,019 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 78 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
298
across the posts below
Posts paid on
26
of 76 we hold a reading for · 34%
Most on one post
152
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zagonbrand. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 78 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (25.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Седня вот собрались с силами и немного пофоткались в офисе в готовящихся к выходу шмотках🙏
Тут у нас и зипка, вдохновлённая Жабьим Отшельником, и двусторонняя тёплая зипка Ватер Ло с аппликацией и мехом, и куртка, вдохновлённая миссией «Артемида-2» и «Смешариками» — серия «Космическая Одиссея», и ещё много всяких штук
Это не профессиональная сьемка и поэтому, чтобы не захламлять канал на днях выложим остальное в ле…
Мы к вам с небольшим пояснением:
Все, что было вчера - это первая часть масштабного ивента, где изделия, которые давно пылились на складе получили второй шанс и огромные скидки.
Вторая часть ивента будет подразумевать под собой избавление от текущей базы, на которую мы наносим принты. Во время него на оставшийся каталог (кроме коллаб и вещей “по мотивам”) будет действовать 60% скидка и также появятся новые дизайны.
…
Привет, комьюнити!! Важное объявление:
В четверг в 14:00 стартует важный для нас ивент.
Шаг очень сложный, во многом даже опасный, но нам нужный. Мы хотим сфокусировать всё внимание команды на одежде по мотивам — с более сложными дизайнами и меньшим количеством принтов.
Мы закрываем эру шмоток с артами по аниме в ZAGON — вещей с персонажами.
Не спешите расстраиваться: это направление продолжится в нашем новом бренде…
Друзья, будьте честны с собой: разве вы видели тишки по Союзмультфильму
круче наших?
Мне кажется идея объединить культовые музыкальные группы и не менее культовых персонажей наших мультфильмов это абсолютный легендарный МЕТЧ!!
Лично моя любимка— это «KISS» + «Бременские Музыканты», а у вас?
Предзаказ коллаборации с Союзмультфильмом открывается уже завтра. Будьте готовы 🤙
С Хэллоуином всех, братва🎃
Пусть вам сегодня перепадет побольше сладостей, и поменьше гадостей!
И микро напоминалка: Spooky-Spooky Cards ещё работают. Заходишь в профиль внутри приложения, открываешь 3 карты из 12 и можешь урвать фри баллы или любую шмотку на выбор! Кстати, из 5 шмоток 4 уже выиграли, так что оч советую поторопиться))
Играем до 4 ноября, попытки обновляются каждую полночь по Мск — так что можно зах…
Поздравляем победителей и просим связаться с нами в @ZAGON_MANAGER🫡
Внимание: Мы НЕ напишем вам первыми, не верьте фейкам
Друзья, не расстраивайтесь, если не выиграли в этот раз.
Скоро новый розыгрыш! в котором снова победят только наши фейки🤪
Бу, испугался? Не бойся, играй 🎃
Припасли для вас кое-что интересное под грядущий Хэллоуин в нашем мобильном приложении 👀
Встречайте «Страшные-страшные карты» - игру, в которой ты можешь выбрать 3 карты из 12. А на кону (кошелек или жизнь) разные плюшки, включая баллы и даже айтемы для самых везучих.
Испытать себя и свою удачу можно до 04.11 включительно. Время пошло 👻
Для того, чтобы найти игру нужно зайти в моб…
ПРЕДЗАКАЗ ГАЧИАКУТА!!!
Куртки уже едут к нам, ориентировочно через 30 дней будут на месте. Как только получим их, сразу начнём отправки ❤️
За основу мы взяли оригинальную куртку Рудо и постарались перенести её в реальную жизнь, сохранив всё, за что она цепляет. Бежевые и графитовые блоки, яркие жёлтые акценты, высокий ворот с капюшоном — всё это отсылает к оригиналу и передаёт атмосферу Гачиакуты.
Помимо этого мы т…
Showing the 12 most recent of 78 posts we hold for @zagonbrand. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @zagonbrand as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
5 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
5 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
13 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 78 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@zagonbrand named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@orvanbrand named in 3 posts, 28 September 2026 – 1 October 2026 · confirmed gone 24 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
JAMCLUB 2.0 @jamclub2 · 79,916 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ZAGON” (@zagonbrand), 30,637 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zagonbrand.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.