Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Алиевчейн | PL

Channel

Алиевчейн | PL

@alievchain

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,138subscribers

+890 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001980645761
TypeChannel
Username@alievchain
DescriptionТеги всей команды: @PROJECTLEAD_CEO @agent033_PL @PL_SERVICE_MANAGER @mentorpl @plcompliance Чат: https://t.me/+GM2V7VrbbN5kZGI6
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/alievchain

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

5,1516,1385,644.57 August 2026 — 5,248 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,248 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,246 subscribers11 August 2026 — 5,235 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,224 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,239 subscribers20 August 2026 — 5,244 subscribers24 August 2026 — 5,237 subscribers26 August 2026 — 5,225 subscribers29 August 2026 — 5,220 subscribers2 September 2026 — 5,195 subscribers7 September 2026 — 5,166 subscribers11 September 2026 — 5,158 subscribers15 September 2026 — 5,151 subscribers25 September 2026 — 5,172 subscribers4 October 2026 — 5,176 subscribers11 October 2026 — 5,173 subscribers14 October 2026 — 5,166 subscribers17 October 2026 — 5,189 subscribers21 October 2026 — 5,191 subscribers24 October 2026 — 5,614 subscribers27 October 2026 — 5,769 subscribers30 October 2026 — 5,942 subscribers1 November 2026 — 6,042 subscribers4 November 2026 — 6,138 subscribers7 August 20264 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 89 days, net +890. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,003–6,286 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 11:456,138+96
1 Nov 2026, 21:296,042+100
30 Oct 2026, 00:055,942+173
27 Oct 2026, 01:175,769+155
24 Oct 2026, 07:315,614+423
21 Oct 2026, 07:095,191+2
17 Oct 2026, 18:275,189+23
14 Oct 2026, 17:005,166-7
11 Oct 2026, 13:545,173-3
4 Oct 2026, 21:005,176+4
25 Sept 2026, 08:575,172+21
15 Sept 2026, 14:225,151-7
11 Sept 2026, 14:365,158-8
7 Sept 2026, 07:175,166-29
2 Sept 2026, 02:465,195-25
29 Aug 2026, 22:555,220-5
26 Aug 2026, 18:335,225-12
24 Aug 2026, 04:175,237-7
20 Aug 2026, 05:135,244+5
17 Aug 2026, 10:555,239first reading

Engagement

42 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.5%
avg views ÷ 6,138 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,440
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.561%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 42 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026
Posts held42 (16 July 2026 – 2 November 2026)
Views total18,779
Reactions total78
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 13:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
198
Videos
9
Links
152

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

202 reactions across 28 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤8743.1%
🔥2914.4%
custom 5307806037066152407157.43%
🤯146.93%
👍136.44%
🏆73.47%
👏73.47%
🤩52.48%
👎41.98%
🤮41.98%
🆒31.49%
😁31.49%
🥰31.49%
💯20.99%
🤣20.99%
🍾10.495%
👌10.495%
😱10.495%
🤝10.495%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 202 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (20.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

2 Nov 2026, 10:32 UTC986 views2 reactionsread 4 November 2026

⭐️КГС локал Кто ищет в лс: @PROJECTLEAD_CEO Закрыли позицию Если появиться дополнительный объем, оповестим

❤2

31 Oct 2026, 15:59 UTC900 views8 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video

1 часть Project Lead начало 2 часть PROJECT LEAD тимлид 3 часть PROJECT LEAD площадка

❤3🤩3🤯2

31 Oct 2026, 15:58 UTC508 views11 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @pr0jectleadPhoto

⭐️ PROJECT LEAD — ПЛОЩАДКА ⭐️ 10 сентября мы получили свою площадку в полноценное управление. С этого момента у нас уже почти 2 месяца работает собственное платёжное решение. Вчера выдали трейдеру юбилейный 500-й токен 🫣 Всё это время мы работали в закрытом формате. Теперь готовы выйти в свет и рассказать о себе подробнее. ⚡️ Кто такие PROJECT LEAD сегодня? Да, у нас есть собственное платёжное решение. Но мы прекра…

❤5🤯3🆒3

30 Oct 2026, 17:45 UTC915 views2 reactionsread 4 November 2026

https://t.me/+zLj5PHZBFPozYzdi Вопросы сюда!

❤2

28 Oct 2026, 16:49 UTC≈1,730 views20 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

ПОСЛЕЗАВТРА В ПЯТНИЦУ 20:00 30.10.2026 😊 Морской критожитель X ⭐️ Алиевчейн Обсудим: ✅ ГУ, какие банки и методы кормят ✅ Мобком что крутят ✅ Ферма физ банков, как поставить на поток ✅ Методы от 20к ✅ КЗ БТ заработок трейдера за смену работы ✅ Другие гео, куда смотреть и какие результаты уже есть ✅ QR в оплату с банков, как это реализовано на PL ✅ Просадка трафика в чем причина После обсуждения — ответим на все ва…

❤6custom 53078060370661524076🤯5👏3

23 Oct 2026, 18:55 UTC≈1,650 views12 reactionsread 4 November 2026

😎 Промокод от TradeCode для наших трейдеров https://t.me/TC_Dashboard_bot?start=pl20_PROJECT ⭐️ При переходе по данной ссылке активируются условия: 3 дня BybitEye бесплатно + Скидка 20% на ByBitEye + 40 проверок на PDF Checker после первой оплаты

❤7👍4🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @alievchain. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Алиевчейн | PL” (@alievchain), 6,138 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alievchain.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.