Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ЯЗЫКИ И ТЕМЫ ТГ ШРИФТЫ

Channel

ЯЗЫКИ И ТЕМЫ ТГ ШРИФТЫ

@oboiparnyea

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

233,892subscribers

-18,638 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001587648312
TypeChannel
Username@oboiparnyea
DescriptionЛучшие темки и язычки для тг🐵 Только по рекламе(платная) - @emka_star
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/oboiparnyea

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@temki_zvezdys/263116 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC@oboiparnyea/26746 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC1.00under a minute
@temki_zvezdys/263226 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC@oboiparnyea/26757 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC1.00under a minute
@temki_zvezdys/263307 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC@oboiparnyea/26765 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC1.00under a minute
@temki_zvezdys/263397 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC@oboiparnyea/26774 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC1.00under a minute
@temki_zvezdys/263467 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC@oboiparnyea/26781 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC1.00under a minute
@temki_zvezdys/263517 Aug 2026, 18:11 UTC@oboiparnyea/26786 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 18:11 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@temki_zvezdys6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minuteeven

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 3 of the 3 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 6 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @temki_zvezdys. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Views per post sit far below this size band

489 average views per post against 233,892 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.209%. Across the 2,443 registered channels in the same cohort — 100,020–316,163 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.36% and 21.5%, with a median of 9.99%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (23 August 2026 22 September 2026)
Posts measured224 of 224 published in the window (224 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled109,586
Mature posts only0.305% over 66 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers233,892 measured 19 September 2026
Cohortb100000:rus · 2,443 channels · p10 2.05% · p25 4.36% · p50 9.99% · p75 21.5% · p90 36.8%
Position in cohort0.696th percentile · 1/48 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.123% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 99.5% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · err_low, last confirmed 22 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

233,309252,530242,919.57 August 2026 — 252,530 subscribers7 August 2026 — 252,530 subscribers8 August 2026 — 252,169 subscribers9 August 2026 — 251,657 subscribers10 August 2026 — 251,157 subscribers11 August 2026 — 250,670 subscribers12 August 2026 — 250,118 subscribers13 August 2026 — 249,610 subscribers14 August 2026 — 248,825 subscribers16 August 2026 — 248,068 subscribers17 August 2026 — 247,332 subscribers18 August 2026 — 246,813 subscribers19 August 2026 — 246,459 subscribers20 August 2026 — 245,747 subscribers22 August 2026 — 245,019 subscribers23 August 2026 — 244,082 subscribers25 August 2026 — 243,249 subscribers26 August 2026 — 242,654 subscribers27 August 2026 — 242,069 subscribers28 August 2026 — 241,637 subscribers29 August 2026 — 241,114 subscribers30 August 2026 — 240,622 subscribers31 August 2026 — 240,080 subscribers1 September 2026 — 239,535 subscribers2 September 2026 — 239,001 subscribers3 September 2026 — 238,508 subscribers5 September 2026 — 237,773 subscribers8 September 2026 — 236,355 subscribers11 September 2026 — 235,052 subscribers13 September 2026 — 234,151 subscribers14 September 2026 — 233,309 subscribers16 September 2026 — 233,950 subscribers19 September 2026 — 233,892 subscribers233,8927 August 202619 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net -18,638. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 230,426–255,413 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 09:58233,892-58
16 Sept 2026, 19:56233,950+641
14 Sept 2026, 18:59233,309-842
13 Sept 2026, 02:39234,151-901
11 Sept 2026, 02:40235,052-1,303
8 Sept 2026, 02:55236,355-1,418
5 Sept 2026, 01:39237,773-735
3 Sept 2026, 09:53238,508-493
2 Sept 2026, 06:42239,001-534
1 Sept 2026, 07:27239,535-545
31 Aug 2026, 06:15240,080-542
30 Aug 2026, 06:47240,622-492
29 Aug 2026, 06:44241,114-523
28 Aug 2026, 08:58241,637-432
27 Aug 2026, 06:58242,069-585
26 Aug 2026, 05:12242,654-595
25 Aug 2026, 02:24243,249-833
23 Aug 2026, 14:46244,082-937
22 Aug 2026, 00:27245,019-728
20 Aug 2026, 17:12245,747first reading

Engagement

341 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 143 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.208%
avg views ÷ 233,892 subscribers
Avg views / post
487
223 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
223
of 341 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 120 of 223 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held341 (6 August 202621 September 2026)
Views total108,706
Reactions total375
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Sept 2026, 04:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
11,900
Videos
210
Links
4,120

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

590 reactions across 184 posts, in 40 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
18831.9%
❤‍🔥13522.9%
👎335.59%
🤡213.56%
💘193.22%
💋122.03%
😭111.86%
🦄111.86%
👍91.53%
😈91.53%
💔81.36%
😡81.36%
🙏81.36%
🆒71.19%
👏71.19%
😁71.19%
🎉61.02%
🔥61.02%
😘61.02%
😢61.02%
20 further kinds7312.4%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 195 of the 341 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 590 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 341 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Sept 2026, 19:02 UTC228 views1 reactionsread 22 September 2026

❤️Любимки забирайте пока их не забрали!!! Активаций: 10❕ ссылка для получения: Получить Premium

1

21 Sept 2026, 19:00 UTC209 views1 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Poll

❤️Мои любимки,хочу вас порадовать и раздать 10 Telegram premium на 12 месяцев хотите??

  1. ДАААА КОНЕЧНО50%
  2. КОНЕЧНО, БЕСПЛАТНО ХОЧУ75%

The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

1

21 Sept 2026, 16:00 UTC368 views6 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

。・♡゚・。 ✧ 。・゚♡゚・。 ✧ 。 подборка лучших стикеров в тг 🥺💘 • артур пиражков • эстетика • мемы картиночки • по (какашка) • видеопак • жабки • милые фразы • мма петрович • деловые собачки • валентин стрыкало • котейки НЕ ЗАБУДЬ ПОДПИСАТЬСЯ НА КАНАЛ👇👇👇 СКОРО ВЫЛОЖУ ЕЩЕ МНОГО КРУТЫХ ТЕМ И ЯЗЫЧКОВ ❤️ 🐾бот для скачивания треков из тг🐾

2❤‍🔥2🤝2

21 Sept 2026, 13:55 UTC413 viewsread 22 September 2026

❤️Любимки забирайте пока их не забрали!!! Активаций: 10❕ ссылка для получения: Получить Premium

21 Sept 2026, 13:53 UTC414 views5 reactionsread 22 September 2026

❤️Мои любимки,хочу вас порадовать и раздать 10 Telegram premium на 12 месяцев!!! хотите? да - ❤️( на 100 лайков даю ссылку)

🤡4🙊1

21 Sept 2026, 11:00 UTC514 views1 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

。・゚♡゚・。 ✧ 。・゚♡゚・。 ✧ 。 🍋 подборка темок по играм (ios/android): • клуб романтики • астронавт • бравл старс • геншин импакт • to the moon НЕ ЗАБУДЬ ПОДПИСАТЬСЯ НА КАНАЛ👇👇👇 СКОРО ВЫЛОЖУ ЕЩЕ МНОГО КРУТЫХ ТЕМ И ЯЗЫЧКОВ ❤️ 😃 @muzykap — наш бот для скачивания музыки 😃

❤‍🔥1

21 Sept 2026, 08:48 UTC521 views1 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

💋 ВСЕ языки из тик тока 💋 ::: 🎁 майнкрафт - установить🦋 😉 ангельский - установить🦋 ❤️ доксграм - установить🦋 🌟готический - установить🦋 удалю ссылку через 5 минут..🥺

1

21 Sept 2026, 06:00 UTC588 views3 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

。・゚♡゚・。 ✧ 。・゚♡゚・。 ✧ 。 🍌 подборка пошлых языков (работает не у всех): • хентай язык • sex язык • хорниграм НЕ ЗАБУДЬ ПОДПИСАТЬСЯ НА КАНАЛ👇👇👇 СКОРО ВЫЛОЖУ ЕЩЕ МНОГО КРУТЫХ ТЕМ И ЯЗЫЧКОВ ❤️ 💗 бот для скачивания музыки тут 💗

2❤‍🔥1

20 Sept 2026, 16:00 UTC771 views2 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

。・゚♡゚・。 ✧ 。・゚♡゚・。 ✧ 。 🩸 Оформи свой тг в стиле «вампир» 🌿языки • дневники вампира • сумерки 🌱темы • клаус • стефан и деймон • деймон 🍃стик • пеппе вампир НЕ ЗАБУДЬ ПОДПИСАТЬСЯ НА КАНАЛ👇👇👇 СКОРО ВЫЛОЖУ ЕЩЕ МНОГО КРУТЫХ ТЕМ И ЯЗЫЧКОВ ❤️ 🐾бот для скачивания треков из тг🐾

💔2

20 Sept 2026, 14:05 UTC456 viewsread 21 September 2026

❤️Любимки забирайте пока их не забрали!!! Активаций: 10❕ ссылка для получения: Получить Premium

20 Sept 2026, 14:00 UTC460 views0 reactionsread 21 September 2026

❤️Мои любимки,хочу вас порадовать и раздать 10 Telegram premium на 12 месяцев!!! хотите? да - ❤️( на 100 лайков даю ссылку)

20 Sept 2026, 11:00 UTC566 views0 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Photo

。・゚♡゚・。 ✧ 。・゚♡゚・。 ✧ 。 🌿 темки для тг (работают не у всех): • фиолетовая • дазай • рисованный человечек • яойчик чб • дождь зеленая (ios) • темная темка (ios) 。・゚♡゚・。 ✧ 。・゚♡゚・。 ✧ 。 НЕ ЗАБУДЬ ПОДПИСАТЬСЯ НА КАНАЛ👇👇👇 СКОРО ВЫЛОЖУ ЕЩЕ МНОГО КРУТЫХ ТЕМ И ЯЗЫЧКОВ ❤️ 😃 @muzykap — наш бот для скачивания музыки 😃

Showing the 12 most recent of 341 posts we hold for @oboiparnyea. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Sept 2026, 19:00 UTCAnonymous Poll12 voters

❤️Мои любимки,хочу вас порадовать и раздать 10 Telegram premium на 12 месяцев хотите??

  1. ДАААА КОНЕЧНО50%
  2. КОНЕЧНО, БЕСПЛАТНО ХОЧУ75%

The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

17 Sept 2026, 18:16 UTCAnonymous Poll29 voters

❤️Мои любимки,хочу вас порадовать и раздать 10 Telegram premium на 12 месяцев хотите??

  1. ДАААА КОНЕЧНО79%
  2. КОНЕЧНО, БЕСПЛАТНО ХОЧУ52%

The shares total 131%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

15 Sept 2026, 18:00 UTCAnonymous Poll32 voters

❤️Мои любимки,хочу вас порадовать и раздать 10 Telegram premium на 12 месяцев хотите??

  1. ДАААА КОНЕЧНО59%
  2. КОНЕЧНО, БЕСПЛАТНО ХОЧУ69%

The shares total 128%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 341 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 21 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Премиум эмодзи | стикеры | Premium Emoji
@TgEmojis · 1,673,928
#1
ЯЗЫКИ И ТЕМЫ ТГ ОБОИ
@temki_zvezdys · 2,354,516
#2
songs | парные авы | темы тг
@animewwp · 522,910
#3
Тесты и точка.
@test_dot · 519,044
#4
Telegram Stickers | Стикеры
@tgsticker · 792,397
#5
ЯЗЫКИ И ТЕМЫ | ОБОИ ТГ
@temki_parnye · 979,901
#6
Premium Emoji Эмодзи и Стикеры
@emodzhi · 517,294
#7
язычки и темы
@yazyki_dlya_tg · 223,613
#8
Темы для Тг | Обои
@sokhryb · 766,246
#9
Язычки | обои | темы тг
@temki_yazykii · 918,395
#10
The end.
@fory7o · 79,774
#11
Идеи маникюра | Дизайн ногтей
@nailsluv · 250,376
#12
я хочу
@hhoottii · 38,623
#13
любовь – это
@love_is_dp · 33,644
#14
✨Идеи для маникюра🤍
@manicuurre · 25,895
#15
Стикеры | Эмодзи
@stikery4 · 1,076,984
#16
Дима Масленников
@maslennikovliga · 2,142,158
#17
Леонардо Дайвинчик
@leoday · 5,518,691
#18
VOBLA • новости
@voina_belgorod_novosti · 1,129,058
#19
здесь живет броен
@br1anm7ps · 1,089,215
#20
дипинс 🤢
@deepinstv · 502,219
#21
Аня Ищук
@anyaischukkkk · 601,146
#22
ЕГОР КРИД
@egorkreed · 746,544
#23
ПАРАДЕЕВИЧ
@paradeevich · 1,059,475
#24
Кишлак
@kishlak_family · 265,329
#25
EDISON FAMILY
@edisonfamilia · 776,895
#26
Клуб Романтики — Мои Истории
@official_romanceclub · 737,665
#27
Милашкина
@milashkina_nekrasova · 251,260
#28
Best Premium Emoji | Премиум Эмодзи
@emoji1 · 1,083,281
#29
folwixxx | темы и стикеры
@f3lvixx · 154,638
#30
Конспиролог Файлы Эпштейна Остров
@TamaevAshabTG · 209,945
#31
Маша и Роберт (Герберы)
@thegerberslive · 645,706
#32
⋅ʚ ✧ ꒰ఎ Wexsavĭ ໒꒱ ✧ ɞ⋅
@wexsavi · 419,670
#33
СИНДИКАТ НОВОСТИ
@syndicatnews · 126,610
#34
ЕГОР ШКРЕД
@egorikvtg · 704,353
#35
Я люблю
@ilowe_you · 112,972
#36
vseonas
@vseonas99 · 58,667
#37
СИМКАА
@simka_lee · 192,241
#38
знак из будущего 💌
@znak_eto · 32,289
#39
люблю
@luv_eto · 31,363
#40
ЛЕОН КЕМСТАЧ
@iminlovewleo · 143,355
#41
слово судьбы
@slovosudba · 31,582
#42
ТРЕШ ВИДЕО | НОВОСТИ 18+
@izrailvoina1 · 527,974
#43
РЕЦЕПТЫ ДИЕТЫ 🥬
@kulinaria_salaty_pp · 80,086
#44
Главный инвестор
@investor_hamster · 43,955
#45
Бадабумчик
@badabum4ikkk · 128,509
#46
милые котики ^-^ коты
@lovemeowcats · 62,748
#47
Екатерина Мизулина
@ekaterina_mizulina · 935,690
#48
Данила Кашен
@DKNASASAL · 391,493
#49
Ставки на хоккей
@na_stavky_khokkey · 9,721
#50
mzlff
@mazellovvv · 421,504
#51
OKB News / Новости от Ок блогера
@okbnews · 190,108
#52
Строчки из песен
@strochki_tg · 54,801
#53
Новости • Жуковский • Раменское
@ramzhuk_news · 49,181 (as read 18 August 2026)
#54
ИГРА В КАЛЬМАРА 2
@film_kino_serialy · 192,299
#55
Глеб три дня дождя
@everydayrain · 237,557
#56
Новости России 76 Сегодня Сейчас
@rossia · 192,029
#57
Москва - это интересно
@mskint · 3,323,451
#58
вика, тебе знак
@znak_vika · 53,489
#59

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

РЕЦЕПТЫ ДИЕТЫ 🥬
@kulinaria_salaty_pp · 80,086
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 1 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ЯЗЫКИ И ТЕМЫ ТГ ШРИФТЫ” (@oboiparnyea), 233,892 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oboiparnyea.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.