Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for آموزش خوانندگی و آواز VIP | 🎙 علی خدایی

Channel

آموزش خوانندگی و آواز VIP | 🎙 علی خدایی

@alikhodaeiproo

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

32,587subscribers

+109 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001812609314
TypeChannel
Username@alikhodaeiproo
Descriptionهر گونه سوال و‌ مشاوره ای در زمینه آموزش خوانندگی ، کلاس های حضوری و‌ غیر حضوری آواز و ساخت موزیک حرفه ای داری میتونی از طریق ایدی تلگرام زیر بپرسی تا کاملا‌ رایگان راهنماییت کنم❤️😍 @alikhodaeiakh @alikhodaeiakh مشاوره در تلگرام و واتس اپ👇 09125591139
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/alikhodaeiproo

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@alikhodaeiproo/4981 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC@vstartvip/13783 Aug 2026, 12:46 UTC1.0072 seconds
@alikhodaeiproo/4986 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC@vstartvip/13835 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTC1.0072 seconds
@alikhodaeiproo/4987 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC@vstartvip/13845 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTC1.0072 seconds
@alikhodaeiproo/4988 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC@vstartvip/13855 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTC1.0072 seconds
@alikhodaeiproo/4989 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC@vstartvip/13865 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTC1.0072 seconds
@alikhodaeiproo/4990 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC@vstartvip/13875 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTC1.0072 seconds
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@vstartvip9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0072 secondsthis entry (8–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 9 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 5 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @alikhodaeiproo — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

32,30532,73332,5197 August 2026 — 32,478 subscribers7 August 2026 — 32,478 subscribers8 August 2026 — 32,471 subscribers9 August 2026 — 32,448 subscribers10 August 2026 — 32,415 subscribers11 August 2026 — 32,372 subscribers12 August 2026 — 32,348 subscribers13 August 2026 — 32,305 subscribers14 August 2026 — 32,435 subscribers16 August 2026 — 32,466 subscribers17 August 2026 — 32,476 subscribers18 August 2026 — 32,463 subscribers19 August 2026 — 32,500 subscribers20 August 2026 — 32,467 subscribers21 August 2026 — 32,451 subscribers22 August 2026 — 32,425 subscribers24 August 2026 — 32,429 subscribers25 August 2026 — 32,407 subscribers26 August 2026 — 32,452 subscribers28 August 2026 — 32,431 subscribers29 August 2026 — 32,408 subscribers30 August 2026 — 32,398 subscribers31 August 2026 — 32,654 subscribers1 September 2026 — 32,733 subscribers2 September 2026 — 32,719 subscribers3 September 2026 — 32,688 subscribers5 September 2026 — 32,657 subscribers8 September 2026 — 32,629 subscribers11 September 2026 — 32,570 subscribers13 September 2026 — 32,583 subscribers14 September 2026 — 32,580 subscribers16 September 2026 — 32,570 subscribers18 September 2026 — 32,587 subscribers32,5877 August 202618 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net +109. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,241–32,797 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 18:0132,587+17
16 Sept 2026, 13:0032,570-10
14 Sept 2026, 15:5732,580-3
13 Sept 2026, 02:1832,583+13
11 Sept 2026, 05:3832,570-59
8 Sept 2026, 12:2032,629-28
5 Sept 2026, 05:5532,657-31
3 Sept 2026, 10:1332,688-31
2 Sept 2026, 06:5332,719-14
1 Sept 2026, 05:5532,733+79
31 Aug 2026, 05:4732,654+256
30 Aug 2026, 09:0832,398-10
29 Aug 2026, 10:3332,408-23
28 Aug 2026, 13:4732,431-21
26 Aug 2026, 15:0532,452+45
25 Aug 2026, 12:2732,407-22
24 Aug 2026, 14:2232,429+4
22 Aug 2026, 22:3732,425-26
21 Aug 2026, 12:0832,451-16
20 Aug 2026, 14:0332,467first reading

Engagement

305 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 77 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.87%
avg views ÷ 32,587 subscribers
Avg views / post
609
126 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.881%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
126
of 305 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 64 of 126 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 September 2026
Posts held305 (3 August 2026 – 14 September 2026)
Views total76,701
Reactions total477
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Sept 2026, 18:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
570
Videos
367
Links
138

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
28m 45s
Average length
41s

Measured directly from 42 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,068 reactions across 160 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤70165.6%
🔥14413.5%
👍757.02%
👏595.52%
🥰262.43%
😁181.69%
😍161.50%
🤔111.03%
👌80.749%
🤣80.749%
👎20.187%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 170 of the 305 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,068 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 305 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 14 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Sept 2026, 14:47 UTC≈2,130 views18 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

میخوام صدای ۲۰ نفرو آنالیز کنم به صورت رایگان✨و بهشون بگم باید چیکار کنن که صداشون خوب بشه! دوست داری جز اون ۲۰ نفر باشی؟ به آیدی زیر عدد ۲۰ ارسال کن😉👇🏻 @alikhodaeiakh @alikhodaeiakh @alikhodaeiakh

❤11🥰4👍2👌1

14 Sept 2026, 09:49 UTC≈2,190 views15 reactionsread 24 September 2026

ردیفه رفیقای علی ؟ سوالی نیست؟😉🔥

❤10👏3👌1🔥1

14 Sept 2026, 09:49 UTC≈2,140 views17 reactionsread 24 September 2026

جمله آخر: وقتی صدای درست، سبک درست و لحن مخصوص خودت کنار هم قرار بگیرن، «امضای صدای تو» ساخته میشه!

❤16👌1

14 Sept 2026, 09:49 UTC≈2,000 views18 reactionsread 24 September 2026

لحن یعنی مدلِ مخصوص خودت برای گفتنِ یک احساس.

❤17👌1

14 Sept 2026, 09:49 UTC≈1,970 views13 reactionsread 24 September 2026

درواقع ممکنه دو نفر یه آهنگ، با یه سبک بخونن، ولی کاملاً متفاوت شنیده بشن؛ اون تفاوت، لحنه!

❤13

14 Sept 2026, 09:48 UTC≈1,950 views12 reactionsread 24 September 2026

لحن: اینکه یه کلمه رو چطور میگی، کجا آروم می‌خونی، کجا محکم، کجا بغض میاری، کجا رها می‌کنی…

❤12

14 Sept 2026, 09:48 UTC≈1,860 views14 reactionsread 24 September 2026

انتخاب سبک یعنی: جایی که صدات، بیشترین احساس رو منتقل می‌کنه…

❤14

14 Sept 2026, 09:46 UTC≈1,840 views13 reactionsread 24 September 2026

😉هرکسی با یه درصدی از آمادگیِ صدا برای خوانندگی به دنیا میاد؛ ولی این درصد، تعیین نمی‌کنه آخرش چقدر خواننده‌ی خوبی میشه…

❤13

14 Sept 2026, 09:43 UTC≈1,190 views13 reactionsread 24 September 2026

صدا + سبک + لحن = امضای صوتی تو 🎤

❤12🥰1

14 Sept 2026, 09:36 UTC≈1,170 views17 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤14👍2🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 305 posts we hold for @alikhodaeiproo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@alikhodaeiproo edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
11 August 2026
Most recent edit
11 August 2026

Polls

The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 Aug 2026, 13:18 UTCAnonymous Poll50 voters

بنظرت کدوم درسته؟😁

  1. خوانندگی استعداد میخواد66%
  2. خوانندگی استعداد نمیخواد42%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

27 Aug 2026, 12:48 UTCAnonymous Poll50 voters

🎤 دقیقا مشکل تنفست موقع خوندن چیه؟

  1. زود خسته میشم22%
  2. صدام میلرزه24%
  3. آخر آهنگ کم میارم30%
  4. نمیدونم درست نفس میگیرم یا نه24%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTCAnonymous Poll54 voters

بنظرت برای شروع خوانندگی کدوم مهم‌تره؟

  1. صدای خوب33%
  2. حس و تکنیک30%
  3. تمرین مداوم44%
  4. آموزش درست57%

The shares total 164%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

24 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTCAnonymous Poll38 voters

راه حل کدومشو میخوای؟👇🏻✅

  1. صدای تو دماغی58%
  2. اوج خوندن66%
  3. احساس در خوانندگی47%

The shares total 171%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

18 Aug 2026, 07:33 UTCAnonymous Poll37 voters

کدوم تکنیکو بهت یاد بدم؟😁

  1. اوج خوندن🤦🏻51%
  2. نفس گیری😲30%
  3. با احساس خوندن🔥49%

The shares total 130%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

12 Aug 2026, 18:37 UTCAnonymous Poll61 voters

از کی باید جدی خوندن رو شروع کنی؟!🎤🤔

  1. وقتی صدات خوب شد؟39%
  2. وقتی پولش رو داشتی؟43%
  3. وقتی یه تیم درست حسابی کنارت بود؟28%
  4. یا وقتی فهمیدی دیر شده؟⌛️21%

The shares total 131%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 305 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 14 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

مینی دوره لباس صدا | هدیه شوکر خوانندگی
@minilebasseda · 2,471
#1
موزینس|musiness
@musiiness · 1,192
#2
صدانو صداسازی مدرن 🎤 | sedano
@doreshoker · 8,021
#3
LilBeat | لیل بیت
@ProdByLil · 2,259
#4
🎸AlifMusic🎤
@Alif_Music · 230
#5
آموزش صداسازی (مدرسه صدا)
@afaghgifts · 9,643
#6
SarDar music
@sardarmusics · 4,091
#7
Inner voice
@aydadhvndi · 429 (as read 5 September 2026)
#8
Arsin Edit
@Arsin_Edits · 404
#9
Tber Beats
@Tberbeats · 7,196
#10
𝐀𝐗𝐎𝐍
@AXONchannel_1 · 165
#11
| MEHRSHAD |
@Mehrshdvoice · 220
#12
Tehran Beat | تهران بیت
@Tehranbeat · 4,528
#13
آموزش گیتار نت و تبلچر
@Guitar_vahidtajik · 6,037
#14
آموزش آواز با شمس فندرسکی
@shamsfendereski_tasnif · 5,661
#15
MirzaBeatz
@MirzaBeatz · 2,674
#16
نت اول
@noteaval · 1,297 (as read 5 September 2026)
#17
Here My Freedom
@myfreedom_myvoice · 1,395
#18
آموزش گیتار | اوژن
@erfanguitarmusic · 8,545
#19
Rap Music 🎶
@resanerapnasl · 86 (as read 5 September 2026)
#20
Dinora🎙️
@dinoramusicc · 288 (as read 5 September 2026)
#21
Cartel Vers | کارتل ورس
@textrapi0 · 762
#22
صداسازی | Sedasazi
@VOICE_OFFICE · 4,885
#23
ASAL
@miyotmusic · 801
#24
دوره های آموزش موسیقی به صورت رایگان 🎶🎷
@persian_saz · 6,952
#25
Vip Mrvoice
@vipmrvoicee · 6,230
#26
صدا | بیان | گویندگی
@yektaseda · 2,214
#27
A M Y A R
@amyartune · 1,073
#28
آمـوزش گیـتار | B A S I R
@basirtunes · 1,568
#29
اموزش تکست نویسی رپ
@amozeshtext · 491
#30
BeatKosh
@beatkosh · 17,350
#31
Poori Beatz
@Poori_Beatz · 3,910
#32
سپید | Sepid
@Sepid_Team · 145 (as read 5 September 2026)
#33
Delta Beat | دلتا بیت
@ideltta · 17,274
#34
AMIRSAM
@amirsam_231 · 112 (as read 5 September 2026)
#35
Haani ♪
@imhaani · 344
#36
غبار.
@qobawr · 382
#37
Arian
@Arianzofficial · 210
#38
BEAT RAP FREE
@BEATRAPFREE · 10,601
#39
Battel Rap | بتل رپ
@Battel_Rap · 8,947
#40
PARSA SANTO | پارسا سانتو
@parsasanto · 1,891
#41
MHDBEATS | بیت
@mhdbeat · 5,990
#42
| Acti1ve |
@Acti1ve · 1,884
#43
Raha Aura🤍
@rahalizaa · 1,246
#44
Free Baet
@freebaet · 891 (as read 5 September 2026)
#45
Full Amir Tataloo
@tatalooir1 · 369 (as read 5 September 2026)
#46
Lams Beat
@LamsBeat · 1,776
#47
𝐍𝐢𝐦𝐚 𝐌𝐨𝐞𝐢𝐧
@niima_moeiin · 643 (as read 5 September 2026)
#48
Ag nevesht
@AGnevesht · 382
#49
Beat rap free
@bit_rap_free · 2,986
#50
nothing new...
@memyselfanditi · 250
#51
‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌Bluāgrana
@Bluagrana4ever · 135
#52
1Beat
@yekbeat · 2,937
#53
𝐒 𝐀 𝐉 𝐀 𝐃
@SajadMusicChanel · 537
#54
_Bardia_
@Bardia_Bahador · 7,544
#55
Majidrazavi
@Majidrazavioriginal · 71,356
#56
فول آلبوم رضا پیشرو
@rezapishroful · 1,231 (as read 5 September 2026)
#57
مـــهـــرآنــ𝄞ـا|𝐌𝐄𝐇𝐑𝐀𝐍𝐀
@Imehranam · 182
#58
Mu3ic_to
@raveshh_mu3ik · 1,335 (as read 5 September 2026)
#59
BANK BEAT | بانک بیت
@Bankbeat · 2,438
#60
بیابونی گیتاریست شو، با گلپو
@gitaristebiyaboni · 1,895
#61
Yasin Jalaei
@yasinjalaei · 23,191
#62
آموزش‌والیبال|مهدی‌طاهری
@mtvolleyyyy · 4,465
#63
Wich vpn/Nor vpn فیلترشکن
@norshoping · 10,431
#64
Mani/Mahan Daneshvar🎸
@Manivoice · 798 (as read 5 September 2026)
#65
Eliyas BeatZ
@eliyasBeatz · 1,332
#66
Mehdi Tunes Beats
@mehditunes1 · 617 (as read 5 September 2026)
#67
STORBEATS
@storbeats300 · 707 (as read 5 September 2026)
#68
Dentistry encyclopaedia
@iran_medi · 1,609
#69
Beatkhor.com/explore
@beatkhor · 23,421
#70
دُژَم
@Blinddate09 · 52
#71
Kiirya Beats
@kiiryabeats · 3,083
#72
WZ Beats
@wzmusic · 20,050
#73

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 5 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Majidrazavi
@Majidrazavioriginal · 71,356
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“آموزش خوانندگی و آواز VIP | 🎙 علی خدایی” (@alikhodaeiproo), 32,587 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alikhodaeiproo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.