Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
24 measurements spanning 89 days, net +121. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,191–7,461 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Nov 2026, 08:46
7,372
-29
30 Oct 2026, 23:18
7,401
-15
27 Oct 2026, 13:16
7,416
-14
24 Oct 2026, 12:55
7,430
+9
21 Oct 2026, 02:49
7,421
+6
17 Oct 2026, 21:56
7,415
+8
14 Oct 2026, 16:30
7,407
+7
11 Oct 2026, 00:55
7,400
+27
4 Oct 2026, 21:55
7,373
+71
25 Sept 2026, 02:18
7,302
+27
16 Sept 2026, 17:38
7,275
+25
12 Sept 2026, 19:56
7,250
+28
9 Sept 2026, 07:37
7,222
-16
4 Sept 2026, 08:17
7,238
-25
31 Aug 2026, 17:14
7,263
+7
29 Aug 2026, 03:14
7,256
+3
26 Aug 2026, 07:14
7,253
-2
23 Aug 2026, 16:14
7,255
-1
19 Aug 2026, 19:58
7,256
-8
16 Aug 2026, 19:06
7,264
first reading
Engagement
41 posts held, back to 10 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
18.2%
avg views ÷ 7,372 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,340
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.99%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 41 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
41 (10 October 2025 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
22,839
Reactions total
454
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 00:40 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
27
Videos
1
Links
175
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
2,186 reactions across 41 posts, in 42 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
812
37.1%
😁
298
13.6%
❤
228
10.4%
🔥
200
9.15%
🤡
115
5.26%
🥱
98
4.48%
👎
86
3.93%
🤣
86
3.93%
💩
42
1.92%
✍
37
1.69%
👌
29
1.33%
😱
20
0.915%
🌭
18
0.823%
😢
13
0.595%
🤮
13
0.595%
🤯
13
0.595%
❤🔥
12
0.549%
🥴
11
0.503%
🤝
8
0.366%
😴
6
0.274%
22 further kinds
41
1.88%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,186 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 10 October 2025 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1,193
across the posts below
Posts paid on
16
of 41 we hold a reading for · 39%
Most on one post
1,010
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @alleria_crypto. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 41 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 October 2025 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 17 posts held from the last 30 days (29.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
XSTOCKS - пост №23
Хстокс дайджест + мысли в целом.
Страсти после кидалова с дивидендами (осуждаю!) улеглись. Наверное в последний раз выскажусь по этой теме:
- На уровне Стретеджи все было правильно, Хстокс тоже синхронно перешли на ежедневные дивы. Единственное в чем ошиблись Хстокс - они ошиблись в "нашу пользу" по сути, выплатив дивы за 2 недели по привычке за 1-й день ноября, что автоматически сделал и Пендл.…
✅ Откупил YT обратно по 12.96% (выходил по 18%), ту же позицию.
Почему - теперь стало понятно что дивы за 1-15 ноября нам "типа" уже дали, предоплатой. Их не будет. Но с 15 по 26 ноября все будет, начисление ежедневно, выплата еженедельно, за последние дни она тоже будет. Только что уточнил.
https://xstocks.alleriacrypto.com/yt
- обновил свой калькулятор, на 1 шаге теперь вводите текущий APY% например 13
- на 2 ша…
Почему не сразу? Потому что текущий рынок Pendle уже развёрнут, и изменить его смарт-контракты посреди срока нельзя.
Таким образом, для текущего YT-STRCx остаётся примерно 10 дней новой дивидендной доходности: с 16 по 26 ноября.
Разумеется, при условии продолжения выплат Strategy и восстановления Watermark Rate по ожидаемому графику.
6️⃣ А что с теми, кто держал YT до 30 октября?
Здесь есть принципиально важное отли…
Если только собираетесь покупать: не ориентируйтесь исключительно на цифру Implied APY в интерфейсе. Считайте реальный оставшийся дивидендный поток, стоимость поинтов и риск полной потери стоимости YT к экспирации.
Напомню, 26 ноября YT истекают и становятся бесполезными как актив. Покупная стоимость YT не возвращается автоматически. Экономический результат формируется из полученных дивидендов, возможной перепродажи…
Мой ИИ-пост по теме ОТ и ДО.
🚨 Что произошло с YT-STRCx на Pendle? Почему остановились дивиденды, что будет до 26 ноября и почему я продал свои YT?
В интерфейсе Pendle появилось предупреждение об отрицательной доходности, дивиденды перестали начисляться, а цена YT начала снижаться.
Я довольно подробно пообщался с командой Pendle в Discord, в частности с Botanic. Теперь картина стала гораздо понятнее.
Попробую объя…
убирайте лимитки если стоят, отменяйте, а то нальют ведь, и пока надо считать что за 1-15 ноября дивов не будет, только за 16-26 ноября, то есть 10 дней из 25 примерно
считаю временно норм ценой 12% примерно APY (4.8% дивы до конца контракта, 7% сверху было до этого)
подробнее обсуждаем в чатике, за 1 сообщение не описать в чем суть, читайте если вовлечены
тем кто зашел через меня (несколько человек) верну деньги и приму на себя убыток, оставив себе поинты которые получены за несколько дней
https://app.pendle.finance/trade/markets/0x8ce3a13852d13e0e991c677a8c6137584e2b7635/
я вышел из YT, дело срочное
судя по всему дивидендов за 1-15 ноября не будет
это сильно меняет математику за остаточный период
не уверен на 100% правильно ли я сделал, сейчас переписываюсь с пендлом в дискорде
но это то что я сделал и это первый источник инфы который вы думаю увидели по этому вопросу
я продал, ДИОР!
✅ Ссылка на форму интереса
Это просто форма для понимания конкретики от тех кто поучаствовал бы. Но прошу указывать реальные данные, а не по приколу)
Решение о запуске ещё не принято мной.
Интересно ли было бы вам зайти в YT xStocks, но не с нуля, а под мой мультипликатор хбуста с моего кошелька (1.7 сейчас, x2 в конце контракта, среднее х1.85 примерно).
За 20% от дропа, если он конечно будет, этот дроп)
Возврат дивидендов 26 ноября как контракт закончится, сразу за весь срок.
С учётом вычета моей доли получается буст х1.5+ где-то на всю позу. Так что кто уже сидит более 1.5 месяцев в позиции, то вы…
XSTOCKS - пост №22
До окончания YT контракта на Пендл остался ровно 1 месяц. Пора продавать чтобы все деньги не сгорели?
Давайте разбираться)
Вижу что многие пишут, типа надо бы уже сливать ютишки, ведь время до экспирации осталось уже мало, пофармил и хватит, не хочу чтобы сгорела позиция и т.д. Но по факту если вы заранее рассчитывали сколько готовы потерять, то такой мув скорее будет даже минусовым (не для всех…
👍20🤣3🥱2❤1👀1👌1
Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @alleria_crypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 10 October 2025 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Мемуары Воркера @promintsecret · 19,890 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 30 September 2026
FACK BLOCK RESEARCH @fackblock · 25,082 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 September 2026
ProMint @ProMintChannel · 24,870 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026
Crypto Hamster @thecryptohamster · 19,497 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 September 2026
Славик инвестор | TwitterScore.io @slavik_investor · 24,366 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 15 September 2026
Defigen Capital | Столица дефигена @defigencapital · 19,766 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 30 September 2026
Crypto & AI Updates | Славик инвестор @Slavik_investor_updates · 20,589 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 September 2026
Max Zarev @maxzarev · 24,502 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 September 2026
CryptoEarn Important @CryptoEarnImp · 27,419 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 September 2026
криптапиражок @cryppi · 30,086 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 7 September 2026
Gem Research @GemResearch1 · 30,033 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 7 September 2026
DEFI Scam Check @Defiscamcheck · 48,181 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
Whitelist Media @whitelist1 · 40,731 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 29 August 2026
Крипто Нарния NEWS @cryptonarnianews · 19,508 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 September 2026
Coin Metrika @CoinMetrika · 34,401 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 2 September 2026
cryptocholy @cryptocholy · 37,827 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 31 August 2026
SWIPER @swiper_money · 27,626 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 9 September 2026
PROFIT MAFIA @ProfiT_Mafia · 34,850 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 September 2026
CryptoHustle & AI @crypthustle · 19,660 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 27 September 2026
БОГДАН, ГДЕ ИКСЫ?! @BogdanGdeX · 25,517 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
PROFIT DRIVE @profit_drive · 21,426 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 September 2026
Кэпитал News @drops_daily · 20,860 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 September 2026
Don | Invest Blog @don_invest · 37,496 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 31 August 2026
Sergey (ICO Drops) заметки @icodrops_sergey · 42,386 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 25 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Alleria Crypto ⚡️” (@alleria_crypto), 7,372 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alleria_crypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.