Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net -393. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,709–20,220 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 04:19
19,768
-32
15 Sept 2026, 20:19
19,800
-21
14 Sept 2026, 03:01
19,821
-24
12 Sept 2026, 12:38
19,845
-32
10 Sept 2026, 08:20
19,877
-18
7 Sept 2026, 00:02
19,895
-13
4 Sept 2026, 12:37
19,908
-34
3 Sept 2026, 00:23
19,942
-4
2 Sept 2026, 01:43
19,946
-11
31 Aug 2026, 23:57
19,957
-7
30 Aug 2026, 21:36
19,964
-5
29 Aug 2026, 19:05
19,969
-11
28 Aug 2026, 17:45
19,980
-9
27 Aug 2026, 21:14
19,989
-3
26 Aug 2026, 20:43
19,992
-12
25 Aug 2026, 17:44
20,004
-12
24 Aug 2026, 17:56
20,016
-16
23 Aug 2026, 05:54
20,032
-12
21 Aug 2026, 19:36
20,044
-10
20 Aug 2026, 16:05
20,054
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 5 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.65%
avg views ÷ 19,768 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,710
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.29%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
22 (5 February 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
1,710
Reactions total
22
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 00:57 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
509 reactions across 22 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
207
40.7%
😁
171
33.6%
❤
63
12.4%
🔥
20
3.93%
😭
18
3.54%
🤯
7
1.38%
👻
4
0.786%
🤷♂
4
0.786%
🤔
3
0.589%
🥰
3
0.589%
👌
2
0.393%
🕊
2
0.393%
🤗
2
0.393%
🆒
1
0.196%
💯
1
0.196%
🥴
1
0.196%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 509 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 5 February 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 22 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @thecryptohamster. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 February 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
#RiseX — раздаст до $34k + 5000 поинтов ТОП100 участникам программы Competition
Главное, что эта программа доступна лишь небольшому числу участников. Всего у нескольких человек есть подходящая реф ссылка, и на данный момент всего 120 участников, поэтому войти в топ 100 и распределить награды не сложно.
Конкурс идет с 21 августа до 18 сентября. Лучше начать чем раньше, т.к. в расчете наград (Trading Score) учитывае…
Бесплатная первая неделя с Claude
Примерно 4 месяца активно вайбкою с ИИ. Последних полтора месяца с Fable 5 от Claude. Я бы сказал, что Fable 5 с момента выхода - это первый настоящим ии, который мыслит комплексно, как человек, а не как вундеркинд с альцгеймером.
Какой бы большой, сложной задача ни была, Фабл видит целостную картину и одновременно взаимосвязывает факты, видит закономерности, ошибки, противоречия.…
Ребята, всех приветствую. Как там ваши крипто-дела? Последние месяцы активно занимаюсь автотрейдингом на Полике, поэтому на канал времени не хватало. Сейчас нашел один перп интересный сразу по нескольким направлениям. Стоит вашего внимания.
—————
🤟 #RiseX — новый перп декс с единым счетом деревативов + спот с возможностью торговать криптой и RWA. Сама технология новая, которая закрывает множество боли.
Поддержка …
StarFlip — PvP игра на деньги, тестнет уже в телеграм!
Открываешь бота — и сразу играешь. Без кошельков, без сетей.
Два игрока, одинаковая ставка, 12 боксов внутри которых раскиданы деньги.
Каждый делает 6 ходов по очереди — открываешь бокс, забираешь что внутри. Кто собрал больше — красавчик. Чистый рандом, чистый PvP.
Каждый раз кто-то заберёт больше чем поставил, кто-то меньше.
Будешь везучим? Чаще соберешь боль…
13 июня в Киеве (уже послезавтра) состоится криптоконференция Incrypted
Время: 12:00-20:00 (регистрация с 10:00)
Место: КВЦ «Парковый», Киев, Украина
Цена:
Regular Pass – 110$
Vip – 300$
👉 Кто еще не успел купить билеты, по промокоду CryptoHamster будет 20% скидка. Сам также буду. Обсудим вечные темы - в какие альткоины сейчас лучше инвестировать, когда ждать тот самый альтсезон, новые Гемы, зарождающиеся тренды.…
Мой хороший знакомый набирает на работу BD, которые имеют большую сетку KOLs. Если кому-то интересно и хочет поработать пишите сюда @garmien.
P.S. Пишите только если есть опыт в этой сфере.
#Polymarket запустит свой perp 😵💫
Ответочка Хайперликвиду за запуск Предикшена 😂. Вроде бы шутка, но с 1 апреля Полик в 2.5 раза больше заработал с комиссий, чем Хайпер.
https://polymarket.com/?r=CryptoHamster
25% на дроп при инвесте $2.9 млрд. А это уже шутка).
К слову, по потенциальному дропу полимаркета (если он будет) сложилось впечатление, что будут раздавать тем, кто заплатил комиссии, которые только недав…
#Arkham запустили свой декс...
https://x.com/arkham/status/2046576748968718758?s=20
https://intel.arkm.com/dex
Не стали заморачиваться с перпами, просто прикрутили страницу со свапалкой шитков на солане. Работы одному прогеру на две недели 😂.
Где здесь и сейчас начать зарабатывать в крипте? Один из реальных способов войти, закрепиться и дальше двигаться - работа по найму в проектах. В моем кругу есть хорошие примеры как кто-то устроился и даже на медвежке сейчас стабильно хорошо зарабатывает.
Решил поддержать знакомого. Ведет канал с Web3 и FinTech вакансиями. Уже закрыли проектам несколько вакансий.
✔️ ЗП: от $1500 до $8000
✔️ dev, маркетинг, дизайн, B…
Осторожно! мошенник создал копию моей группы и мог вас добавить участником. Уже несколько человек написали в личку по этому поводу.
😁12👍9
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @thecryptohamster. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Расскажите, кто чем занят сейчас в крипте и не только, учитывая текущие реалии?
Занят чем-то в крипте (зарабатываю с неё)12%
Занимаюсь криптой, но не зарабатываю в моменте с неё31%
основная работа/источник дохода - не крипта57%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 5 February 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
PROFIT MAFIA @ProfiT_Mafia · 35,568 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 September 2026
Crypto Drive @drivecrypto · 27,480 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 September 2026
Gem Research @GemResearch1 · 40,136 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 7 September 2026
Coin Metrika @CoinMetrika · 35,139 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 2 September 2026
Don | Invest Blog @don_invest · 38,443 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 31 August 2026
Whitelist Media @whitelist1 · 42,015 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 29 August 2026
Славик инвестор | TwitterScore.io @slavik_investor · 24,783 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 15 September 2026
БОГДАН, ГДЕ ИКСЫ?! @BogdanGdeX · 25,977 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
CoinList Official @coinlistofficialchannel · 38,743 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 31 August 2026
Фармер: Крипта и Схемы @byrealfarmer · 53,427 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 August 2026
SWIPER @swiper_money · 28,436 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 9 September 2026
CryptoEarn Important @CryptoEarnImp · 28,227 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 September 2026
Max Zarev @maxzarev · 25,143 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 September 2026
ProMint @ProMintChannel · 25,194 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026
Климченко | про криптовалюту @thevse · 35,323 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
IDO research @idoresearch · 57,589 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
Crypto Family Public @CryptoFamilyPublic · 29,315 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 September 2026
Crypto mnst [Youtube] @mnstmoney · 25,431 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 September 2026
SWOP TOKY | CRYPTO MEDIA @swoptoky · 31,630 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 5 September 2026
Sergey (ICO Drops) заметки @icodrops_sergey · 42,908 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
КРИПТОРЕЛАКС @CRYPTORELAKS · 26,502 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 September 2026
Crypto Night @cryyptonight · 24,584 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 15 September 2026
10 долларов Баффетта @buff_10 · 60,148 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
Криптовалюты @cryptoc · 22,802 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 September 2026
This channel appears in 26 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Hamster” (@thecryptohamster), 19,768 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thecryptohamster.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.