Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
60 measurements spanning 91 days, net -664. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,397–20,261 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 20:20
19,497
-8
4 Nov 2026, 21:20
19,505
-1
4 Nov 2026, 00:26
19,506
-6
3 Nov 2026, 01:15
19,512
-6
2 Nov 2026, 01:27
19,518
-3
31 Oct 2026, 22:06
19,521
-11
31 Oct 2026, 00:36
19,532
-4
30 Oct 2026, 00:56
19,536
-7
29 Oct 2026, 02:37
19,543
-6
27 Oct 2026, 21:57
19,549
-6
27 Oct 2026, 00:20
19,555
-11
26 Oct 2026, 03:10
19,566
-2
25 Oct 2026, 05:08
19,568
-7
24 Oct 2026, 07:36
19,575
-6
23 Oct 2026, 07:58
19,581
-2
22 Oct 2026, 09:28
19,583
-2
20 Oct 2026, 23:06
19,585
-7
19 Oct 2026, 22:09
19,592
-7
18 Oct 2026, 19:07
19,599
-1
17 Oct 2026, 19:29
19,600
first reading
Engagement
42 posts held, back to 5 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
17.7%
avg views ÷ 19,497 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,440
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.467%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 42 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 October 2026
Posts held
42 (5 February 2026 – 30 October 2026)
Views total
41,330
Reactions total
193
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 15:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
16m 25s
Average length
5m 28s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
834 reactions across 42 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
317
38.0%
😁
201
24.1%
❤
180
21.6%
🔥
67
8.03%
😭
18
2.16%
🤷♂
11
1.32%
👻
7
0.839%
🤔
7
0.839%
🤯
7
0.839%
🕊
6
0.719%
👌
4
0.48%
🥰
3
0.36%
💯
2
0.24%
🤗
2
0.24%
🆒
1
0.12%
🥴
1
0.12%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 834 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 5 February 2026 to 30 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 42 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @thecryptohamster. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 42 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 February 2026 to 30 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 12 posts held from the last 30 days (33.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🚨 Binance взломали на $6,3 млрд — крупнейший взлом в истории криптовалют.
Сумму официально подтвердила сама биржа.
По предварительным данным, хакеры получили доступ к ноутбуку DevOps-инженера Binance, после чего смогли отправлять транзакции из горячих кошельков биржи. Утечки приватных ключей при этом не обнаружено.
Главные цифры:
• $6,3 млрд — общий ущерб.
• 167 тыс. ETH, 1,6 млрд USDT и 823 млн USDC вывели в одн…
Сегодня взломали:
Polymarket
Binance
Bitget
Bybit (вроде бы)
Вроде бы никого не пропустил.
Binance взламали на 2.7B, из которых на 1.8B уже заморозили стейблов. Кошель Ким Чен Ына. Шитков там много у него.
🔥Последние двое суток прям в ударе - 746k оборота на две биржи. Обороты получаются заметно выше, чем ожидались.
Главное расходы. -$10.7 с учетом уже исправленной ошибки, без нее - 5$.
Таким образом на $1M оборота без ошибок расход — 7$ (ошибки конечно еще могут вылазить).
Теперь главное, сколько поинтов насыпят.
🚬 Сегодня прушный день с момента последней правки, хоть и выходной. Темп $285k в сутки на двух биржах при ожидаемом расходе 0. Но судить по нормальному можно будет в конце недели по факту раздачи поинтов.
Такие вот результаты за 2 дня работы софта получились. Торговые объемы $214 000 на двух биржах при нуле расходов. Все сделки тейкерские, что плюс, максимальная рандомизация, нативность в торговле (участвует много пар, разное время удержания). Полный отчет дам в конце недели, когда насыпят поинтов.
⭐️ #Arcus — новый Perp DEX на Robinhood Chain от команды dYdX со старта с большими торговыми обьемами
1 октября стартовал 1 сезон и суточные торговые объемы уже составляют $250-500M. Если брать проекты без токенов, то при 250M это топ 3-4 место, при 500M - топ 2 после вариейшинал. Большие торговые объемы это хорошо. Чем они больше, тем больше проект зарабатывает и тем больше может быть FDV на выходе, соответственно,…
#Lighter — как настроить и торговать с телефона, за которое идет х2 поинтов
В дискорде админы подтверждают, что сыпят х2 поинтов не просто за подключение мобильного Robinhood Wallet через QR в web, а именно торговлю с мобильного.
✅ При подключении на сайте (инвайт CRYPTOHAMSTER) выбираем кошелек Robinhood Wallet и дальше см. видео как установить кошель на Iphone и подключить прокси, который будет распространятся то…
👀 Фармлю поинты Variational + Lighter бесплатно
Несколько дней подряд получалось фармить поинты бесплатно хеджируя между двумя проектами, то есть не уходя по балансу в минус, при этом делая нормальные торговые объемы.
Решил сделать еженедельную публичную отчетность. Создал 2 новых аккаунта Variational и Lighter и пополнил оба по 2500$, то есть суммарно на 5000$. Выше видеопруф акков сейчас до начала фарма.
Спустя …
#Arkham - пока закончились лимиты на Клод, решил поднять старую историю, которой собирался заняться вплотную.
100 000$ потерянных денег моих рефералов вместе с моими - потраченных на комиссии и слипейджи. Я решил заняться этим вопросом на столько на сколько получится. Одно дело, если бы проект просто бы себе соскамился, но их основной продукт продолжает существовать, и подобная компания, им явно будет мозолить глаза…
❤34🔥10🤷♂7🕊4👻2
Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @thecryptohamster. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Расскажите, кто чем занят сейчас в крипте и не только, учитывая текущие реалии?
Занят чем-то в крипте (зарабатываю с неё)12%
Занимаюсь криптой, но не зарабатываю в моменте с неё31%
основная работа/источник дохода - не крипта57%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 5 February 2026 to 30 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Defigen Capital | Столица дефигена @defigencapital · 19,766 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 30 September 2026
PROFIT MAFIA @ProfiT_Mafia · 34,867 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 September 2026
PROFIT DRIVE @profit_drive · 21,426 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 September 2026
PROCENT @procent_crypto · 21,207 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 September 2026
Crypto Drive @drivecrypto · 26,224 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 September 2026
Ethereum, Биткоин, Блокчейн @EthereumIC · 23,098 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 3 October 2026
Gem Research @GemResearch1 · 30,033 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 7 September 2026
Coin Metrika @CoinMetrika · 34,401 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 2 September 2026
CryptoHustle & AI @crypthustle · 19,683 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 27 September 2026
Liberty ICO | Crypto @libertycryptoq · 20,209 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 September 2026
❄️Bad Santa AI&Crypto @BadSantaDrop · 21,622 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 September 2026
Don | Invest Blog @don_invest · 37,503 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 31 August 2026
Whitelist Media @whitelist1 · 40,731 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 29 August 2026
Славик инвестор | TwitterScore.io @slavik_investor · 24,373 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 15 September 2026
БОГДАН, ГДЕ ИКСЫ?! @BogdanGdeX · 25,517 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
CoinList Official @coinlistofficialchannel · 37,873 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 31 August 2026
Фармер: Крипта и Схемы @byrealfarmer · 52,177 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 August 2026
Крипту⚡️Фармим @cryptfarm · 19,336 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 1 October 2026
SWIPER @swiper_money · 27,626 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 9 September 2026
CryptoEarn Important @CryptoEarnImp · 27,419 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 September 2026
Crypto & AI Updates | Славик инвестор @Slavik_investor_updates · 20,589 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 September 2026
Max Zarev @maxzarev · 24,502 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 September 2026
ProMint @ProMintChannel · 24,880 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026
Климченко | про криптовалюту @thevse · 34,699 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 38 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Hamster” (@thecryptohamster), 19,497 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thecryptohamster.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.