Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for что-то про крипту

Channel

что-то про крипту

@chtototamprocryp

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,309subscribers

-27 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001601001701
TypeChannel
Username@chtototamprocryp
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/chtototamprocryp

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9,3099,3639,3366 August 2026 — 9,336 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,335 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,328 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,363 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,343 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,328 subscribers23 August 2026 — 9,317 subscribers26 August 2026 — 9,326 subscribers29 August 2026 — 9,353 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,334 subscribers5 September 2026 — 9,333 subscribers10 September 2026 — 9,338 subscribers14 September 2026 — 9,340 subscribers18 September 2026 — 9,309 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 43 days, net -27. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,301–9,371 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 07:199,309-31
14 Sept 2026, 00:209,340+2
10 Sept 2026, 12:199,338+5
5 Sept 2026, 16:569,333-1
1 Sept 2026, 06:569,334-19
29 Aug 2026, 13:169,353+27
26 Aug 2026, 07:339,326+9
23 Aug 2026, 03:469,317-11
20 Aug 2026, 01:239,328-15
16 Aug 2026, 19:489,343-20
12 Aug 2026, 22:059,363+35
9 Aug 2026, 18:429,328-7
6 Aug 2026, 16:409,335-1
6 Aug 2026, 09:229,336first reading

Engagement

73 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.5%
avg views ÷ 9,309 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,160
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.747%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 73 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held73 (28 July 202625 August 2026)
Views total3,480
Reactions total26
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 07:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

415 reactions across 49 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁25561.4%
🔥5713.7%
4510.8%
👍174.10%
🤔143.37%
😱102.41%
🤬61.45%
🤩40.964%
🎉30.723%
🤯30.723%
🥰10.241%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 53 of the 73 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 415 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 73 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
113
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 72 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
51
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @chtototamprocryp. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 73 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 25 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

25 Aug 2026, 18:49 UTC≈1,060 views5 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Чет вообще фул сюда перешёл https://t.me/antarctic_wallet_bot/app?startapp=ref_5485a167d5 Приложение Хай лвл конечно у них

🔥5

Signed Zk-Talk💙

25 Aug 2026, 17:12 UTC≈1,110 views5 reactionsread 29 August 2026

В апексе платину взял У вас как дела?

😁5

Signed Zk-Talk💙

24 Aug 2026, 14:05 UTC≈1,310 views16 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

😁141🥰1

Signed Zk-Talk💙

22 Aug 2026, 11:57 UTC≈1,750 views3 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Ща бы кофейка

3

Signed Zk-Talk💙

21 Aug 2026, 20:13 UTC≈1,960 viewsread 29 August 2026

У Бразильца с метоксом кайфовый альбом, кто не слушал, прицените

Signed Zk-Talk💙

21 Aug 2026, 14:57 UTC≈1,880 views10 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Так у меня нормальный ген, это у вас хуйня, она же зачем-то сделана для меня не вкусной, значит была причина

🔥8😁2

Signed Zk-Talk💙

21 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC≈1,740 views19 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Кто придумал, что кинзу надо класть в блюдо? Зачем вы это делаете?

😁12👍6🤬1

Signed Zk-Talk💙

20 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTC≈1,850 views12 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

3 ярда ликвидаций шортистов )

🔥8🤬31

Signed Zk-Talk💙

20 Aug 2026, 11:50 UTC≈1,820 views11 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Сразу же, после этого: – Binance купила 37,296 $BTC. – Coinbase купила 19,062 BTC. – Bybit купила 9,702 BTC. – Wintermute купила 9,510 BTC. – OKX купила 8,427 BTC. – Kraken купила 6,905 BTC. Эти даже уже не стесняются

😁11

Signed Zk-Talk💙

19 Aug 2026, 18:21 UTC≈1,700 views4 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Ласт возможность наставить софтов, актуальных штук 10 ещё

😁4

Signed Zk-Talk💙

18 Aug 2026, 20:51 UTC≈1,690 views2 reactions50 Starsread 29 August 2026

Как у вас дела вообще старые?

🔥2

Signed Zk-Talk💙

Showing the 12 most recent of 73 posts we hold for @chtototamprocryp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

17 Aug 2026, 15:28 UTCAnonymous Poll109 voters

Главный вопрос

  1. С нуля в дарк соулс 373%
  2. Го в секиро27%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 Aug 2026, 19:29 UTCAnonymous Poll123 voters

Стрим ориентировочно в воскресенье, будем дарк соулс 3 проходить и буду пиздеть о крипте, давайте время +- определим

  1. с 14-00 по мск7%
  2. с 18-00 по мск20%
  3. с 22-00 по мск25%
  4. Я не приду55%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 73 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 25 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Коля флипает
@sol_TOP · 39,965
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 30 August 2026
Славик инвестор | TwitterScore.io
@slavik_investor · 24,783
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 15 September 2026
Ворк в крипте, только хардкор
@workIncrypts · 33,664
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 3 September 2026
FACK BLOCK RESEARCH
@fackblock · 24,911
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 September 2026
Max Zarev
@maxzarev · 25,143
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 September 2026
Фармер: Крипта и Схемы
@byrealfarmer · 53,427
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 August 2026
Герман на блокчейне 🇪🇹
@blockchaingerman · 32,945
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 4 September 2026
Evgeniy Shevchenko CRYPTORUN
@cryptorun · 128,702
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 August 2026
КриптоБош
@cryptobosh · 151,127
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
ꜱᴇɪɴᴀʀᴜᴋɪʀᴏ
@seinarukiro · 85,023
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 22 September 2026
Игорь Андреев |Трейдинг|Волновой анализ
@igorcryptotrader · 30,090
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 7 September 2026
CRYPTON | Крипта, ИИ, Финансы
@crypton_off · 60,363
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 August 2026
КриптоАтака 24 ⚡️
@cryptoattack24 · 56,173
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 23 August 2026
БОГДАН, ГДЕ ИКСЫ?!
@BogdanGdeX · 25,977
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
IDO research
@idoresearch · 57,589
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
криптапиражок
@cryppi · 30,536
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 7 September 2026
SWOP TOKY | CRYPTO MEDIA
@swoptoky · 31,630
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 5 September 2026
cryptocholy
@cryptocholy · 38,600
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 31 August 2026
DEFI Scam Check
@Defiscamcheck · 48,614
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
Климченко | про криптовалюту
@thevse · 35,323
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
Nikita Anufriev | Хедлайнеры
@nainspire · 40,147
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
ARUT NEWS
@arutnews · 29,153
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 8 September 2026
TTC | TimeToCrypto
@nftTTC · 34,831
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 2 September 2026
Кулинария | Блюда
@kulinar_b · 36,171
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 42 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“что-то про крипту” (@chtototamprocryp), 9,309 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chtototamprocryp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.