12 measurements spanning 32 days, net +33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,588–9,659 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Sept 2026, 15:58
9,639
-9
2 Sept 2026, 12:33
9,648
-3
30 Aug 2026, 04:11
9,651
+31
26 Aug 2026, 23:35
9,620
-3
23 Aug 2026, 16:36
9,623
-3
20 Aug 2026, 11:57
9,626
-6
17 Aug 2026, 15:26
9,632
-2
14 Aug 2026, 10:16
9,634
+38
10 Aug 2026, 19:25
9,596
-8
7 Aug 2026, 10:37
9,604
-2
7 Aug 2026, 01:45
9,606
no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:33
9,606
first reading
Engagement
28 posts held, back to 20 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
23.2%
avg views ÷ 9,639 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,240
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.88%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 28 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held
28 (20 April 2026 – 25 August 2026)
Views total
15,680
Reactions total
294
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 05:42 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1,315 reactions across 28 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
642
48.8%
😁
296
22.5%
❤
193
14.7%
🔥
101
7.68%
👎
56
4.26%
🤝
8
0.608%
✍
5
0.38%
🤷♂
5
0.38%
👌
3
0.228%
💯
2
0.152%
🤬
2
0.152%
🤔
1
0.076%
🤯
1
0.076%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,315 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 20 April 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
317
across the posts below
Posts paid on
19
of 28 we hold a reading for · 68%
Most on one post
37
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @SaversCrypto. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 28 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 April 2026 to 25 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
#FLOP #AIRDROP
КАК ПОЛУЧИТЬ АИРДРОП❓
📹СМОТРЕТЬ📹
🔹В данном видео подробнее рассказал про новый проект Артура Хэйса
🔹Показал первую активность, которая стартовала вчера
🔹И поделился мыслями каким вообще может быть дроп
📌ССЫЛКИ ИЗ ВИДЕО:
🔸Твиттер проекта
🔸Сайт
🔸Первый сайт для генерации DID
🔸Второй сайт для генерации DID
Традиционно попрошу, если ролик зашел и в целом хотелось бы видеть короткие разборы актуа…
#РЫНОК #YOUTUBE
КУДА ИДЕТ БИТКОИН❓
ВАЖНЫЕ УРОВНИ❗️
МЫ ПОВТОРИМ 2019 И КОВИД ДАМП?
📹СМОТРЕТЬ📹
Маркет мейкер вышел из летней спячки и я тоже решил протестировать формат коротких обзоров рынка
🔹В видео показал уровни-ориентиры, за которыми следует наблюдать!
🔹Куда может быть коррекция после этого роста
🔹И почему после выхода в зону 85-100к я буду ждать дамп
Приятного просмотра!
Лайкните, плиз, если зайдет формат и…
2.5 ярда шортов за сутки вынесли)
Просто жесть
Врываемся в топ по ликвидациям за всю историю - https://coinmarketcap.com/charts/liquidations/
Даже повода какого-то специального не придумали для этого 😃
Просто ММ проснулся спустя 1.5 месяца
При этом альты почти мертвые, а вот эфирчик молодец
#LIGHTER #ROBINHOOD
ГЛАВНЫЕ НЮАНСЫ ФАРМИНГА
Пару дней назад Лайтер анонсировал новую поинт программу с дропом специально для Робингуда
💸Выделяют 11 млн $LIT в качестве наград
📂И небольшой раздел в доки добавили по этому сезону
📌Главные правила:
🔹В неделю распределяют 200 000 поинтов: часть онлайн, часть раз в неделю. Первая раздача 21 числа
🔹При фарме через кошелек Robinhood дают х2 поинтов
🔹Официально разрешено…
#ИНСТРУМЕНТЫ #ПОДБОРКА
📌ЧТО Я ИСПОЛЬЗУЮ В КРИПТЕ
Данный пост назревал давно и вот решил сделать единую подборку
1️⃣#ОБМЕННИК
Уже 2+ года все обмены через @thehermesex
Несколько сотен сделок, все отлично, точно рекомендую.
Да, будет чуть хуже курс, но зато можно не переживать за безопасность и исполнение сделки
2️⃣#NANSEN
Также около 2-х лет всю ончейн активность отслеживаю через них. Иногда еще Arkham, но привы…
#AXIS #NEWPROJECT
РАЗБОР НОВЫХ ПРОЕКТОВ
В начале лета я задался вопросом: «А есть ли вообще какие-то новые проекты в крипте, где не просто одно и тоже штампуют, а что-то свое пытаются делать команды?»
Все уже устали от десятков одинаковых и никому не нужных перпов, предикшенов и дефаек
И в Июне месяце я пошел копаться и искать что-то свежее на просторах Твиттера
За последние пару месяцев я в приватке разобрал гд…
#FWA
✍️Теперь про мой опыт
Я потестировал все варианты
🔹Слоты начал крутить еще при капе токена в 15 лямов.
1 раз выпала нфт за 0.4 эфира (забрал эфир из пула, который был в том же сайзе), пару раз было в эквиваленте билета почти и раза 4 где-то на 40% ниже стоимости билета
Соответственно все неудачные прокруты я конвертировал в токены $FWA и держу их, не сливаю
🔹Ликвидность я предоставлял несколько раз
🔸Взял NF…
#FWA
ГЕМ ИЛИ ПИРАМИДКА❓
Буквально 6 дней назад ребятки из TokenWorks (те самые, которые до этого сделали PunkStrategy и неплохо качнули) запустили новый проект - Fake World Assets
Последние пару дней я потыкал его со всех сторон и расскажу Вам все нюансы и можно ли тут действительно заработать
В ЧЕМ СМЫСЛ ПРОЕКТА❓
Если помните, у MagicEden какое-то время назад появились Packs
Слоты казиношные, где вы покупаете …
👍9❤5😁5👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @SaversCrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Готовы ли Вы под новый цикл роста покупать альты вообще, как класс активов?
Нет, с меня довольно. Только биткоин готов покупать и держать26%
У меня есть портфель альты, который не готов ни продавать, ни докупать, с ним буду ждать роста26%
Да, готов, но ограничусь буквально топами типа эфира, соланы, хайпа и парочку других19%
Да, буду набирать то, в чем вижу перспективу независимо от места в СМС и общего разочарования9%
У меня есть портфель альты и планирую также усреднять/докупать8%
Буду делать портфель мелкокапов на 50-100 иксов+4%
Вообще не планирую делать какой-либо инвест портфель с холдом. Только спекуляции, дропы, сейлы и др.14%
Ваш вариант10%
The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
За последние месяцы не обходится и недели, чтобы не было какого-то взлома или скама проекта.
Пострадали ли Вы от них?
Да, меня коснулись взломы14%
Да, но меня больше затронули котировки на эти альты11%
Нет, меня все обошло стороной70%
Ваш вариант8%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 20 April 2026 to 25 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
криптапиражок @cryppi · 30,602 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 7 September 2026
Coin Metrika @CoinMetrika · 35,302 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 2 September 2026
CryptoEarn Important @CryptoEarnImp · 28,421 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 September 2026
Sergey (ICO Drops) заметки @icodrops_sergey · 43,072 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
IDO research @idoresearch · 57,741 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
SWIPER @swiper_money · 28,634 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 9 September 2026
PROFIT MAFIA @ProfiT_Mafia · 35,709 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 September 2026
Gem Research @GemResearch1 · 39,969 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 7 September 2026
Герман на блокчейне 🇪🇹 @blockchaingerman · 33,043 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 4 September 2026
Don | Invest Blog @don_invest · 38,577 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 31 August 2026
Whitelist Media @whitelist1 · 42,117 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 29 August 2026
GENESIS @trend_gen · 55,420 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 August 2026
СЛЕЗЫ САТОШИ @slezisatoshi · 124,495 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
Климченко | про криптовалюту @thevse · 35,414 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
Drops Analytics @drops_analytics · 655,255 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
cryptocholy @cryptocholy · 38,812 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 31 August 2026
КриптоАтака 24 ⚡️ @cryptoattack24 · 56,325 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 23 August 2026
Crypto Fundraising (StandWithUkraine 🇺🇦) @crypto_fundraising · 28,165 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 September 2026
Ворк в крипте, только хардкор @workIncrypts · 33,819 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 3 September 2026
CoinList Official @coinlistofficialchannel · 38,904 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 31 August 2026
DEFI Scam Check @Defiscamcheck · 48,710 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
Trader 80/20 @tradertrend · 60,887 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Savers Crypto” (@SaversCrypto), 9,639 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SaversCrypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.