Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for СДВГ как стиль жизни

Channel

СДВГ как стиль жизни

@allie_adhd

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,648subscribers

+553 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001788151311
TypeChannel
Username@allie_adhd
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/allie_adhd

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

15,09515,64815,371.57 August 2026 — 15,095 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,099 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,104 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,106 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,105 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,131 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,168 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,257 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,301 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,352 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,382 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,388 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,385 subscribers21 August 2026 — 15,389 subscribers23 August 2026 — 15,402 subscribers24 August 2026 — 15,441 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,448 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,452 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,459 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,453 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,464 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,472 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,488 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,505 subscribers3 September 2026 — 15,506 subscribers4 September 2026 — 15,533 subscribers7 September 2026 — 15,569 subscribers10 September 2026 — 15,608 subscribers12 September 2026 — 15,618 subscribers14 September 2026 — 15,627 subscribers16 September 2026 — 15,648 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 40 days, net +553. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,012–15,731 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 03:1615,648+21
14 Sept 2026, 08:5815,627+9
12 Sept 2026, 16:1815,618+10
10 Sept 2026, 18:4115,608+39
7 Sept 2026, 13:5715,569+36
4 Sept 2026, 15:1615,533+27
3 Sept 2026, 01:5315,506+1
2 Sept 2026, 02:1215,505+17
1 Sept 2026, 01:0715,488+16
30 Aug 2026, 22:2715,472+8
29 Aug 2026, 18:5315,464+11
28 Aug 2026, 17:1515,453-6
27 Aug 2026, 19:1415,459+7
26 Aug 2026, 17:5415,452+4
25 Aug 2026, 19:2215,448+7
24 Aug 2026, 19:0415,441+39
23 Aug 2026, 04:2815,402+13
21 Aug 2026, 17:5715,389+4
20 Aug 2026, 13:2915,385-3
19 Aug 2026, 12:2215,388first reading

Engagement

35 posts held, back to 13 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.5%
avg views ÷ 15,648 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,930
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 35 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held35 (13 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total78,930
Reactions total5,589
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 50m
Average length
5m 49s

Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

11,748 reactions across 35 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5,32045.3%
💯1,36611.6%
😢1,0388.84%
😁8467.20%
❤‍🔥7636.49%
🙏5915.03%
💔3573.04%
🔥3242.76%
👍2942.50%
🤔2271.93%
🤯1741.48%
🥰1541.31%
1000.851%
🎉890.758%
😍340.289%
🕊240.204%
👏220.187%
👎200.17%
🤬50.043%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,748 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
55
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 35 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @allie_adhd. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 35 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 15:39 UTC≈2,260 views241 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Зачем говорить фразы, если вы не имеете их ввиду 😭

154🔥25👍18😢15💯13🤔7💔5❤‍🔥4

1 Sept 2026, 12:28 UTC≈3,020 views344 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

👩‍🍳Я делаю книгу рецептов для нейроотличных ребят, и мне нужна ваша помощь! Книга почти готова, но я боюсь, что могла что-то упустить. Хочу проанализировать как можно больше источников, чтобы в материале точно было всё, что может понадобится. 🤩 Что мне нужно от вас: 1️⃣ напишите ваши любимые ПРОСТЫЕ рецепты / блюда / перекусы (которые решают главную задачу - не умереть с голода) 2️⃣назовите ваши топ безопасных блюд

254❤‍🔥46😍32💯6🔥4👎1🥰1

28 Aug 2026, 07:45 UTC≈4,820 views543 reactions50 Starsread 3 September 2026

Поражает то, как я всю жизнь удивляюсь, почему мне внезапно так плохо физически и эмоционально, а потом приложение напоминает, что через 5-7 дней начнутся месячные. ПМДР сильно ухудшает не только физическое и эмоциональное состояние, но и все симптомы СДВГ, что жутко бесит. Знаю, что у большинства девушек также. Можете объяснить, почему нас это каждый месяц застаёт врасплох?

🙏292😢11876💯38💔14👍3👎1🤔1

27 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC≈5,120 views572 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Дружеское напоминание, что дискомфорт в теле может быть по причине узкой одежды / колготок / носков / штанов. Полдня не понимала, почему меня так тошнит. Сняла топик - тошнота прошла 🤐.

😢319123💯54🔥44🤔11👍9🥰5😁3

26 Aug 2026, 12:53 UTC≈5,070 views165 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Кто лучше понимает эмоции? Насколько вам это сложно делать? Или это уже отработанный навык, помогающий вам выживать?

126❤‍🔥21🔥10😁8

25 Aug 2026, 16:50 UTC≈5,280 views405 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Я продолжаю удивляться, что нейтотипичные ребята не думают о том, куда и сколько смотреть при разговоре с человеком 🙃

229😁99💯54💔8❤‍🔥6🔥5🤔3👍1

24 Aug 2026, 07:03 UTC≈5,930 views638 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

«не похоже будто у тебя СДВГ» Спасибо, я делаю всё, чтобы этого не было видно🙃

😁396💯13378❤‍🔥18👏5💔4🥰2😢2

23 Aug 2026, 12:17 UTC≈5,270 views208 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Дай бог здоровья ИИ переводчику, теперь можно быстренько вам перевести интересную статью и не мучиться ЧАСАМИ, как я это делала раньше. Перевели и законспектировали с ИИ статью про смолл ток и нейроотличие. «Почему смолл-ток кажется пыткой: потребность людей с СДВГ и аутизмом в глубоком общении» Неприязнь к смолл-току и тяга к глубоким беседам у нейроотличных людей — это не антисоциальность, не грубость и не дефект

133🔥33💔20❤‍🔥6👎6🤯5👍3🤔1

22 Aug 2026, 15:26 UTC≈4,910 views410 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Как обычно, смотрю видео Dr K, где он объяснил, зачем small talk при знакомстве. Цитата: Сейчас я всё чаще замечаю, как людей раздражает смол-ток. Они недоумевают: «Слушай, ну в чём вообще смысл этой болтовни? Мы просто сидим и какое-то время говорим ни о чём. Когда уже начнутся настоящие, глубокие разговоры? Мне плевать, кем ты работаешь или где вырос. Я хочу знать: что ты думаешь об экзистенциальной угрозе искусст

❤‍🔥230💯7945🤔2313👍11😢4👎2

22 Aug 2026, 10:14 UTC≈4,740 views392 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

POV: ты разговариваешь с человеком, который не понимает принципы зрительного контакта. Вы в какой группе? Я в обеих 😭

179😁139💯50😢12❤‍🔥5👍5👏1🥰1

21 Aug 2026, 06:34 UTC≈4,880 views408 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Меня не было дома всего лишь 2.5 дня, но вся еда в холодильнике теперь кажется прошлогодней, которую уже нельзя есть 😭 Почему так…? Upd: если я никуда не уезжала, то мне вообще пофиг, сколько дней еде, если не воняет

247💯84❤‍🔥37🤔16💔10😁9🙏5

20 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC≈5,360 views183 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Крашу волосы и рассказываю об отношениях Самое личное и длинное видео на канале. 100 раз передумала, но всё-таки решила выставить. Надеюсь, что кому-то будет полезно. Мне, 4 года назад, было бы. Если вам хотелось узнать, что там у меня в отношениях такого интересного. То смотрите)) в основном рассказываю о том, как я иду от тревожно-избегающего типа привязанности к надежному. Поделитесь своими историями и типами!

134❤‍🔥30🔥18👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @allie_adhd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Где моё внимание?
@pure_cognitions_adhd · 27,385
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“СДВГ как стиль жизни” (@allie_adhd), 15,648 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/allie_adhd.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.