Channel
@alltechup
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,000subscribers
+735 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001917227753 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alltechup |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alltechup |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 08:38 | 4,000 | +280 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:36 | 3,720 | -11 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:08 | 3,731 | +105 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:56 | 3,626 | -8 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 01:51 | 3,634 | +376 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:29 | 3,258 | -7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:30 | 3,265 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 3,265 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 6 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
23 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12 | 52.2% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 17.4% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 17.4% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 8.70% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 4.35% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 6 March 2026 to 25 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ከTelegram ሳትወጡ $5 በቀላሉ የምትሰሩበትን አንድ ስራ ልጠቁማችሁ በመጀመርያ ከታች ያሉዉን Link ነክታችሁ ትገባላችሁ ይሄ ስራ ምትሰሩት Bot ላይ ነው ሊንኩን ነክታችሁ ወደ ቦቱ እንደገባችሁ ከላይ ምስሉ ላይ እንዳለዉ አይነት ያመጣላችዋል እናተ አዲስ ገቢ ስለሆናችሁ 3 Spin ይሰጣችዋል በዛ Spin ወደ $0.7 ትደርሳላችሁ ከዛ የነሱን Channel Join አርጉ እና ተጨማሪ +3 Spin ይሰጣችዋል ይላችዋል። Join ታደርጉ እና +3 ተቀብላችሁ ከዛ Spin ታደርጋላችሁ። ከዛ ወደ $0.8 ወይም 0.9 ትደርሳላችሁ። ማስታወቂያዎችን በመስራት/በማየት ተጨማሪ ታገኛላችሁ። ቀጥታ የእናንተን መጋበዣ Link ወስዳችሁ ሌላ አካዉንት ወይም ለሌላ ሰዉ Sh…
❤2🔥1🥰1
Channel name was changed to «AlltechUp.com»
File, posted without a caption
⚡1
#ለቴክ_ወዳጆች Agentic AI Fundamentals: Architectures, Frameworks, and Applications (የኤጀንቲክ አርቴፊሻል ኢንተለጀንስ (Agentic AI) መሰረታውያን፡ አርክቴክቸሮች፣ ፍሬምወርኮች እና መተግበሪያዎች) ዓለም አቀፍ ደረጃውን የጠበቀ የስልጠና ቪዲዮ ነው:: አሰልጣኙ #ዴቪድ_ሊንቲከም ይባላል:: በዓለም አቀፍ ደረጃ የታወቀ የኢንተርፕራይዝ ቴክኖሎጂ Thought Leader ነው:: #በLinkedin ዓለም አቀፍ እውቅና ያላቸው ስልጠናዎችን ይሰጣል:: ይህ ቪዲዮ/ኮርስ ኤጀንቲክ አርቴፊሻል ኢንተለጀንስን (Agentic AI) ለመረዳት ያስችላል:: የጠለቀ ጽንሰ-ሀሳባዊ መሰረት ያስይዛል። በAgentic Ai ዘመን የትብብ…
❤2👍1
AI ኤጀንት ፍሬምወርኮች፡ የአዲሱ ዲጂታል ዘመን የጀርባ አጥንት . . . ባለፉት ጥቂት ዓመታት ውስጥ ስለ አርቴፊሻል ኢንተለጀንስ ስናወራ በአብዛኛው ትኩረታችን እንደ ChatGPT እና Gemini በመሳሰሉ የቋንቋ ሞዴሎች ላይ ነበር። እነዚህ ሞዴሎች መረጃን አቀናጅተው በመጻፍ፣ ለጥያቄዎቻችን ምላሽ በመስጠት እና ከምንሰጣቸው ጽሁፍ ተነስተው አስደናቂ ምስሎች/ቪድዮዎች በመፍጠር እጃችንን በአፋችን አስይዘዋል። በአሁኑ ወቅት ደግሞ በዓለም አቀፍ የቴክኖሎጂ አውድ ውስጥ አርቴፊሻል ኢንተለጀንስ (AI) ከጥያቄና መልስ አገልግሎት ሰጪነት ተሻግረዋል። የቴክኖሎጂው ቀጣዩ ምዕራፍ ራሱን ችሎ ተግባራትን ወደሚያከናውንበት "የኤጀንቶች ዘመን" ደርሷል። "ከማወቅ" አልፈው …
❤1🔥1
4. መቀናጀት (Integration)፦ ፍሬምወርኩ ከነባር ሶፍትዌሮች እና ከውጭ ዓለም መረጃዎች (APIs) ጋር በቀላሉ መገናኘት መቻሉን ማረጋገጥ የማይታለፍ ተግባር ነው። ----- #ማጠቃለያ የኤአይ ኤጀንት ፍሬምወርኮች ወደፊት የምንሰራበትን መንገድ ሙሉ በሙሉ የመቀየር አቅም አላቸው። እነዚህ ቴክኖሎጂዎች በሂሳብ አያያዝ፣ በጋዜጠኝነት፣ በፖሊሲ ትንተና እና በከተማ ልማት እቅዶች ላይ ትልቅ እገዛ ሊያደርጉ ይችላሉ። ለምሳሌ፦ አንድ የከተማ ልማት ኤጀንት የመሰረተ ልማት ዳታዎችን ተንትኖ ትክክለኛ የወደፊት የልማት አቅጣጫዎችን ሊጠቁም ይችላል። ይሁን እንጂ ቴክኖሎጂው እያደገ ሲሄድ ከደህንነት እና ከሥነ-ምግባር ጋር የተያያዙ ጥያቄዎች መነሳታቸው አይቀሬ ነ…
AI ኤጀንት ፍሬምወርኮች፡ የአዲሱ ዲጂታል ዘመን የጀርባ አጥንት . . . :
የአርቲፊሻል ኢንተለጀንስ ሚስጥር (የቢቢሲ - ዘጋቢ ፊልም) . . . #BBC ከዜዎቹ በላይ በሚሰራቸው በአስደናቂ ምርምር የታገዙ ዘጋቢ (Documentary) ፊልሞቹ የገነነ ስም ነው። የቢቢሲ ዶክመንተሪዎችን ማየት የጀመረ ሰው በቀላሉ አይላቀቀም። ተጣብቆ ነው የሚቀረው🤗😁 ቢቢሲ ከሰራቸው ምርጥ ዘጋቢ ፊልም አንዱ "AI Confidential: The Assassin and the Algorith (የአርቲፊሻል ኢንተለጀንስ ሚስጥር፡ ገዳዩ እና አልጎሪዝም)" በሚል ርዕስ የተዘጋጀው ይጠቀሳል። በታዋቂዋ የሂሳብ ተመራማሪ ፕሮፌሰር ሃና ፍራይ (Professor Hannah Fry) የተዘጋጀ ነው። አጠቃላይ ይዘቱ ሲጨመቅ አርቲፊሻል ኢንተለጀንስ (AI) ከሰው ልጅ ሕይወት…
❤1🔥1
File, posted without a caption
❤1🔥1🥰1
"AI Confidential: The Assassin and the Algorith (የአርቲፊሻል ኢንተለጀንስ ሚስጥር፡ ገዳዩ እና አልጎሪዝም)" ; የቢቢሲ - ዘጋቢ ፊልም 👇👇
❤1
👆👆Udemy - Agentic Ai Fundamentals
❤1
File, posted without a caption
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @alltechup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 383,430 of 1,629,808 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@alltechup named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AlltechUp.com” (@alltechup), 4,000 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alltechup.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.