Channel
@alramly
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
12,997subscribers
-80 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001006179715 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alramly |
| Created | 1 November 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 5 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alramly |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:56 | 12,997 | -8 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:33 | 13,005 | -5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:42 | 13,010 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:25 | 13,014 | +5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 13,009 | +3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:27 | 13,006 | +1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:37 | 13,005 | +6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:49 | 12,999 | -7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:24 | 13,006 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:41 | 13,009 | -7 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:06 | 13,016 | -7 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 20:07 | 13,023 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 13,027 | -7 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:07 | 13,034 | -7 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 14:54 | 13,041 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:13 | 13,042 | -8 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 13,050 | -10 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:15 | 13,060 | -8 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:33 | 13,068 | +2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:33 | 13,066 | first reading |
30 posts held, back to 25 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 30 (25 May 2026 – 31 August 2026) |
| Views total | 35,170 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 20:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
إلى متى سنبقى أسرى لسايكس بيكو؟! إلى متى سنبقى بعيدين عن أخلاق الإسلام والتحاكم إلى شرع الله في كل صغيرة وكبيرة؟! كلما أخطأ أردني -بالمعنى المعاصر- في سورية، أو سوري في الأردن، أو فلسطيني في الأردن، أو أردني في فلسطين، وكذلك اللبناني؛ قام البعض بسب وشتم كل الأردنيين والفلسطينيين والسوريين واللبنانيين وكذلك في الدول الأخرى، وصارت فتنة على مواقع التواصل. عملكم هذا محرم من عدة وجوه، وفيه من الظلم الشيء الكثير، وستحملون…
ليس غضب الطبيعة، بل هو غضب الله الذي خلق الطبيعة التي تعنون بها الرياح والأمطار والنار وما شابه، وهو الذي يأمرها وينهاها، وهم جند الله يعاقب بهم من شاء من عباده، لذلك ما ترونه من زلازل وفيضانات ونيران هي عقاب وتحذير، ومعرفتنا بهذه الحقيقة يدفعنا إلى التأمل والمراجعة والاستغفار والتوبة، فقد كثر الفساد في الأرض. وأما خداع أنفسنا بغير ذلك فيبقينا في مكاننا وكما نحن في الذنوب والمعاصي إلى أن تأتي القاضية ، فاحذروا.
الموضوع أكبر مني ومنك ليس موضوع (تشف) بل موضوع تشويه صورة الدعوة وتنفير العامة عنها. لذلك رأيتُ أنه من اللازم الذب عنها والبراءة من قولك (البعيد كل البعد عن الواقع) الذي نفر الناس عن الدعوة واستغله أعداؤها أسوأ استغلال لقوة الإعلام عندهم وضعف دينهم فقد أخذوه وزادوا عليه كذبات كثيرة ونسبوه للدعوة لا لك وحدك للتنفير عنها. ولعلك أدركت ذلك لما حذفته نصيحتي لك: تحل بالحكمة والتروي والاقتصار على ما لابد منه من الكلام حتى ل…
اللهم رحمتك بأهلنا في الجزائر، اللهم احفظهم بحفظك، احفظهم من شر النيران وضررها.
عندما نكتب مقالة نرد بها القول الباطل ولا نذكر اسم الشخص يكون المقصود واضحا، وهو: رد الباطل بغض النظر عن قائله. ولكن تبدأ التعليقات والأسئلة: من هو؟ من قال هذا؟ يا أخي اجعل همك معرفة الحق الذي ذكرناه لك بالدليل، واحذر من الباطل الذي حذرناك منه، فهذا أصل مقصود المنشور. وأما الشخص القائل فالتعامل معه موضوع آخر دعه لوقته.
بعض الناس يهمه الدفاع عن الشيخ الذي يتعصب له، ولا يهمه إن كانت الدعوة ستشوه أو تسقط في أعين الجهال واقع مر.
"لم نسمع أن اسرائيل استخدمت الطيران في غزة، وما يحدث هناك افلام" إن صح هذا الكلام عمن يُنقل عنه أنه قاله؛ فهو دليل على أنه يعيش في غياهب الجب، أو أن في عقله شيئا. وكأنه ينكر جرائم اليهود في حق المسلمين هناك؟!
«الشيخ الألباني -رحمه الله- قد تجاوز القَنْطَرَةَ في علم الحديث، وشهد له أئمةُ هذا الزمن به، وليس مِثْلُ محمد عوّامة مَن يَحِقُّ له أن يُصَنِّفَهُ أو يحكم على علمه؛ لسببين: الأول: أن الرجلَ يَحْكُمُ عليه مَن هو مثله أو أعلى منه في العلم، وهذا غير متوفر في محمد عوّامة مع الألباني. والثاني: الخلاف العَقَدِيّ والمنهجي والعلمي بين الرجلين، وهذا يدفع إلى الظلم وعدم الإنصاف غالبًا».
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
نصيحة واحدة ولكنها والله نجاة لكم من تحمل تبعات كلامكم في دين الله يا من تكتبون وتتكلمون باسم الدين والشرع والسلفية على مواقع التواصل الاجتماعي: لا تتقدموا بين يدي العلماء، ولا تنشروا مِن عندكم، ولا تحسنوا الظن بتهوركم وخفتكم وجهلكم، فسن الشباب سن الخفة والطيش والتهور، ووالله إن الكثير منكم يفسد من حيث يريد أن يصلح وهو لا يعلم. والبعض لا يهمه سوى أن يكون كلامه موضوعا (ترند) للشهرة أو جمع المال، وبعدها إما أنه لا يعرف…
نصيحة طيبة وموفقة وهي مبنية على شرع الله لا على هوى النسوية
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @alramly. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@alramly edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“القناة الرسمية للشيخ علي بن مختار آل علي الرملي” (@alramly), 12,997 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alramly.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.