Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 40 days, net +107. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,022–5,163 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 15:37
5,145
-1
13 Sept 2026, 03:02
5,146
+2
9 Sept 2026, 13:19
5,144
-3
3 Sept 2026, 19:41
5,147
+8
31 Aug 2026, 21:05
5,139
+3
28 Aug 2026, 17:47
5,136
+25
25 Aug 2026, 21:56
5,111
+39
23 Aug 2026, 07:12
5,072
+19
19 Aug 2026, 18:05
5,053
+1
16 Aug 2026, 20:58
5,052
+4
13 Aug 2026, 16:27
5,048
+5
10 Aug 2026, 12:52
5,043
+1
7 Aug 2026, 20:23
5,042
+4
7 Aug 2026, 05:31
5,038
first reading
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 24 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
14m 03s
Average length
3m 31s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
762 reactions across 24 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 89.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
683
89.6%
👍
37
4.86%
😢
22
2.89%
🔥
6
0.787%
😍
6
0.787%
🫡
4
0.525%
👏
3
0.394%
🙏
1
0.131%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 762 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
مؤامرة !
كل ما وقع ويقع وسيقع تستطيع نسبته إلى المؤامرة ..
فارق كبير بين تخطيط الأعداء للشيء، وبين استثمارهم له، بسبب التقصير الواقع من الداعي والمجاهد ..
نسبة كل شيء للأعداء، والاعتقاد بأن كل ما يجري هو من المؤامرة علينا، حتى لو كان من صميم فعلنا وصف للمنافقين لا المؤمنين يحسبون كل صيحة عليهم !
هذه الشريحة تعاني من خلل كبير في فهم حقائق الدين وضبط الموازنة بينهما !
من لا يتقن نسبة الموازنات بين الحقائق ستتضخم ل…
س: ما السبب في مسارعة الصحابة -رضي الله عنهم- في الاستجابة لأمر الله؟ وكيف نقتدي بهم؟
ج: المحبة العظيمة للدين.. الصحابة كانوا يستشعرون بأنهم مؤتمنون على الإسلام..
ومن يعظم لديه الحب يسهل عليه البذل ويهون في نظره ما يكبر عند غيره !
الصحابة كانوا يعدون الاستجابة للأمر فوزا وإن كان فيه قتلهم !
كما قالها أحد عظمائهم لمّا طعن في ظهره وخرج الرمح من صدره ومسح الدم بوجهه !
الصحابة كانوا يعيشون للإسلام وبالإسلام فلم يكن لد…
📢 ندعوكم للمشاركة في دورة:
فَبِهُدَاهُمُ اقْتَدِهْ
الأنبياءُ صفوةُ الخلقِ، وأئمةُ الهدى، ومصابيحُ الدُّجى؛ أمر اللهُ نبيَّه باقتفاء آثارهم فقال: ﴿فَبِهُدَاهُمُ اقْتَدِهْ﴾ ، نقف في هذه الدورة على مواضع الأسوة منهم: إيمانٌ لا يخالطه شكٌّ، ودعوةٌ بالحكمة وصبرٍ على الأذى، وإصلاحٌ لا يُبتغى عليه أجرٌ، وعلمٌ يُطلَب فيُعمَل به، وسَمْتٌ يُهتدى بهديه.
📆 نبدأ رحلتنا يوم الأربعاء ٢٢ صفر.
📍 للمشاركة في الدورة انضم للقناة
شار…
لذة لا ثمن لها
من لذات الحياة قراءة سيرة ابن هشام والعيش مع خير الأنام بأبي وأمي عليه الصلاة والسلام..
الشخص بعد هذا الكتاب لن يكون حاله وقلبه وحبه وإيمانه كما كان قبله بشرط القراءة مع المعايشة للأحداث وليس من أجل الفراغ وختم الكتاب..
عجيبة هذه السيرة كلما قرأتها تشعر بقوة مواقفها وأحداثها وتميز وفرادة وعظمة صاحبها -عليه الصلاة والسلام- حتى كأنك لم تقرأها قبل ذلك !
بادر وجاهد في إدخال هذا الكتاب العظيم في حياتك..…
فهم الإسلام ..
إن أردت تعميق فهمك للإسلام والإصابة في تنزيل أحكامه:
فلا تعزل النص القرآني والحديث النبوي عن طبيعة المرحلة التي نزل بها .. ولا عن سياقه من السورة .. ولا عن بقية النصوص المتعلقة به ..
بقدر إتقانك وفهمك لهذه الثلاثة مع فهم طبيعة الأشياء يكون عمق إدراكك لما جاء به الإسلام من شرائع وأحكام ومنهج ونظام ..
طبيعة الأشياء:
السياسة لابد من فيها من الكيد والمكر .. الحرب لابد فيها من الخداع .. المرأة تغلبها ال…
والله لأحدثهموه !
قال محمد بن إسحاق: وكان - فيما بلغني - عن أم هانىء بنت أبي طالب رضي الله عنها واسمها هند في مسرى رسول الله، أنها كانت تقول: ما أسرى برسول الله إلا وهو في بيتي، نائم عندي تلك الليلة في بيتي، فصلى العشاء الآخرة، ثم نام ونمنا، فلما كان قبيل الفجر، أهبنا رسول الله فلما صلى الصبح، وصلينا معه، قال:
"يا أم هانىء لقد صليت معكم العشاء الآخرة كما رأيت بهذا الوادي. ثم جئت بيت المقدس فصليت فيه، ثم قد صليت صلاة…
تأخر القلب!
قال الله تعالى:
"أَلَمْ يَأْنِ لِلَّذِينَ آمَنُوا أَن تَخْشَعَ قُلُوبُهُمْ لِذِكْرِ اللَّهِ وَمَا نَزَلَ مِنَ الْحَقِّ وَلَا يَكُونُوا كَالَّذِينَ أُوتُوا الْكِتَابَ مِن قَبْلُ فَطَالَ عَلَيْهِمُ الْأَمَدُ فَقَسَتْ قُلُوبُهُمْ ۖ وَكَثِيرٌ مِّنْهُمْ فَاسِقُونَ"
قال عبد الله بن مسعود:
ما كان بين إسلامنا وبين أن عاتبنا الله بهذه الآية:
" ألم يأن للذين آمنوا أن تخشع قلوبهم لذكر الله " إلا أربع سنين.
وقال ا…
❤37😢3
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @alsiraalnbwei. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
المصطفى من الفوائد والسير @turaath_ah · 32,203 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 September 2026
برنامج "أين الطريق؟"| القناة الرسمية @WhereIsTheRoad · 27,485 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 September 2026
تسجيلات دروس رِفقة || @rifqahrecordings · 28,469 Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 9 September 2026
صوتيات د. خالد أبوشادي 🔊 @khaledabushadii · 35,612 Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“السيرة النبوية | أحمد الهاجري” (@alsiraalnbwei), 5,145 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alsiraalnbwei.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.