Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for amantonio

Channel

amantonio

@amantonio

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

77,315subscribers

-91 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001169993190
TypeChannel
Username@amantonio
DescriptionЧат: https://t.me/amantonioChat
Created13 January 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/amantonio

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

77,31277,42177,366.56 August 2026 — 77,406 subscribers6 August 2026 — 77,406 subscribers7 August 2026 — 77,415 subscribers8 August 2026 — 77,416 subscribers9 August 2026 — 77,411 subscribers10 August 2026 — 77,406 subscribers12 August 2026 — 77,410 subscribers13 August 2026 — 77,408 subscribers15 August 2026 — 77,412 subscribers16 August 2026 — 77,421 subscribers17 August 2026 — 77,415 subscribers18 August 2026 — 77,404 subscribers19 August 2026 — 77,387 subscribers20 August 2026 — 77,364 subscribers21 August 2026 — 77,395 subscribers23 August 2026 — 77,399 subscribers24 August 2026 — 77,384 subscribers25 August 2026 — 77,376 subscribers27 August 2026 — 77,373 subscribers28 August 2026 — 77,370 subscribers29 August 2026 — 77,364 subscribers29 August 2026 — 77,356 subscribers30 August 2026 — 77,349 subscribers31 August 2026 — 77,338 subscribers1 September 2026 — 77,333 subscribers3 September 2026 — 77,312 subscribers4 September 2026 — 77,322 subscribers7 September 2026 — 77,315 subscribers77,3156 August 20267 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 32 days, net -91. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 77,296–77,437 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 01:5677,315-7
4 Sept 2026, 10:3977,322+10
3 Sept 2026, 00:4377,312-21
1 Sept 2026, 19:5477,333-5
31 Aug 2026, 21:5477,338-11
30 Aug 2026, 19:4877,349-7
29 Aug 2026, 23:1777,356-8
29 Aug 2026, 02:4977,364-6
28 Aug 2026, 02:3877,370-3
27 Aug 2026, 02:0377,373-3
25 Aug 2026, 22:5477,376-8
24 Aug 2026, 21:3877,384-15
23 Aug 2026, 07:0477,399+4
21 Aug 2026, 19:0377,395+31
20 Aug 2026, 18:0777,364-23
19 Aug 2026, 19:5877,387-17
18 Aug 2026, 18:4877,404-11
17 Aug 2026, 19:3477,415-6
16 Aug 2026, 15:5277,421+9
15 Aug 2026, 02:1577,412first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 71 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.3%
avg views ÷ 77,315 subscribers
Avg views / post
28,800
1 post measured
Reaction rate
4.30%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held20 (17 December 202519 August 2026)
Views total28,800
Reactions total1,239
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Sept 2026, 18:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
283
Videos
56
Links
141

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
7m 15s
Average length
3m 38s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

34,186 reactions across 20 posts, in 41 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12,08135.3%
🔥5,22015.3%
👍5,19715.2%
😱3,66110.7%
😢2,1016.15%
💯9032.64%
🤯8962.62%
🙏8082.36%
🙈6321.85%
👏4871.42%
🤬3711.09%
😭3651.07%
💔2670.781%
🎉2000.585%
😁1550.453%
🤔1170.342%
❤‍🔥1150.336%
🎄1020.298%
🤡930.272%
🤪700.205%
21 further kinds3451.01%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34,186 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 December 2025 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
319
across the posts below
Posts paid on
19
of 20 we hold a reading for · 95%
Most on one post
61
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @amantonio. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 December 2025 to 19 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 18:56 UTC≈28,800 views1,239 reactions3 Starsread 9 September 2026

Недавно были опубликованы результаты рандомизированного исследования, показавшего, что лекарство от гриппа Тамифлю в 2 раза повышает риск смерти. То, что Тамифлю убивает больше людей, чем спасает, известно уже 15 лет. Просто поскольку рандомизированных исследований не было, а производитель отказывался публиковать данные, доказательная медицина в лице ВОЗ, CDC и FDA могла утверждать, что Тамифлю - эффективный и безоп

👍602😱331158🤬43🔥40💯21🙏19💔14

17 May 2026, 10:53 UTC≈43,700 views2,089 reactions1 Starread 9 September 2026

Я практически не пью алкоголь. Напился я всего один раз - лет в 17, в клубе с друзьями. Было весело, но на следующий день я чувствовал себя не очень хорошо, и желания повторять этот опыт у меня больше не возникло. Могу выпить пару глотков вина на мероприятии, но не более. Почему наша цивилизация выбрала именно алкоголь в качестве ультимативного наркотика для расслабления и социализации при наличии более безопасных ал

👍1,140550🔥160💯75🤔56😁49👏22🙏13

3 May 2026, 13:13 UTC≈51,200 views2,278 reactions1 Starread 9 September 2026

В 2014 году в католическом приюте для незамужних матерей в Туаме (Ирландия) обнаружили братскую могилу, где были захоронены сотни детей. С 1930-х по 1970-е годы фармацевтическая компания Burroughs Wellcome (ныне GSK) проводила на этих детях испытания комбинированных вакцин, не информируя их матерей. Об этих исследованиях стало известно лишь в 1990-е годы. Католические монахини утверждали, что в 2013 году Комиссия п

😱1,220🤯429🤬247😭184💔6952😨35🙏33

26 Mar 2026, 11:37 UTC≈54,800 views1,412 reactionsread 9 September 2026

J.B. Handley приводит в своей книге показания под присягой доктора Ричарда И. Келли, директора Клинической лаборатории масс-спектрометрии Института Кеннеди Кригера и доцента кафедры педиатрии Медицинской школы Университета Джонса Хопкинса: АДВОКАТ: Согласны ли вы с утверждением, что вакцины не вызывают аутизм? ДОКТОР КЕЛЛИ: Нет. АДВОКАТ: Принято ли в медицинском сообществе мнение, что вакцины не вызывают аутизм?

🔥816254👍190🤔46😁23👏22💯22🤡17

19 Mar 2026, 12:04 UTC≈56,100 views1,265 reactions1 Starread 9 September 2026

В ноябре 2025 года в Испании была зафиксирована вспышка африканской чумы свиней (АЧС) среди диких кабанов в районе Барселоны. АЧС приводит к 100% летальности зараженного скота. Впервые вне Африки вирус был обнаружен в Лиссабоне в 1957 году, после чего циркулировал на Пиренейском полуострове около 40 лет и был окончательно ликвидирован лишь к 1995 году. Так случайно получилось, что первые случаи АЧС в 2025 году, спус

🙈573😱227👍12894🔥56🤡54😢52🤣30

18 Mar 2026, 15:25 UTC≈42,700 views1,147 reactions3 Starsread 9 September 2026

Новости с прививочного фронта - ХII 1. Американская академия педиатрии (AAP) подала иск против Роберта Кеннеди и HHS. Среди прочего AAP утверждает, что перевод вакцинации из категории рутинной в формат «совместного принятия решений с родителями» требует от врачей слишком много времени, за которое они не получают оплаты. На этой неделе федеральный судья Брайан Мерфи приостановил пересмотр детского календаря вакцинац

😢729217👍63😡49🙏26😱25🔥15🗿8

11 Mar 2026, 15:22 UTC≈50,700 views1,653 reactions4 Starsread 9 September 2026
Photo

Небезызвестный и не очень честный любитель фармы Crémieux опубликовал в твиттере таблицу исследований, с утверждением, что антиваксеры врут, и что почти все вакцины из календаря были протестированы с использованием плацебо. Я проанализировал исследования, которые он приводит. Он их явно не читал, или читал и обманывает сознательно. Ниже привожу перевод моего комментария на русский. (Я редко пишу в твиттере, посколь

877🔥332👍207😱69😢61👏34💯25🥴18

4 Mar 2026, 15:27 UTC≈50,200 views1,067 reactions1 Starread 9 September 2026
Photo

Поскольку вакцины - это святой Грааль и главный ключ к сверхдоходам всей медицинской отрасли, часто публикуются обсервационные исследования, которые демонстрируют, что вакцины якобы эффективны не только от той болезни, против которой они были разработаны, но и от других заболеваний. - Вакцина против гриппа защищает от инфаркта! - Вакцина против ротавируса защищает от диабета 1-го типа! - Вакцина против коклюша защищ

👍571149🔥148🤪70😁51🙈39👏18🤣7

3 Mar 2026, 08:28 UTC≈81,900 views1,534 reactions2 Starsread 9 September 2026
Video

Роберт Кеннеди объясняет, почему всей медицинской системе - врачам, фармацевтическим и страховым компаниям - выгодно, чтобы вы болели. Никому кроме вас и ваших близких не выгодно, чтобы вы были здоровы.

721💯578👍132🔥61🙏20😢13🤔4👎2

25 Feb 2026, 06:54 UTC≈57,800 views595 reactions50 Starsread 9 September 2026

Разбираемся с Оффитом. Часть 18. VAERS и VSD «Фанатизм всегда является компенсацией подавленного сомнения.» Карл Юнг Глава 10 (окончание) Формальдегид Посвятив алюминию лишь пару страниц, Оффит переходит к формальдегиду. Он приводит пять исследований, которые, по его утверждению, опровергают тезис "формальдегид в составе вакцин вызывает рак". При этом одно из этих исследований обнаружило, что формальдегид являет

363👍145🔥36🙏24👏10🤯8❤‍🔥4👨‍💻2

19 Feb 2026, 09:45 UTC≈76,900 views2,551 reactions51 Starsread 9 September 2026
Photo

Эмми, 11-летняя дочь флористки Лоры Маривен, умерла от рака в 2022 году. Французский фонд компенсаций жертвам пестицидов признал её смерть связанной с внутриутробным воздействием пестицидов во время беременности матери. Флористка Мадлен Кинг, долгое время страдавшая от постоянных недомоганий, в какой-то момент пришла к выводу, что её проблемы связаны с пестицидами в цветах. Она стала использовать защитное снаряжение

😱1,640🤯418191😭76😢58👍49🔥41💔27

29 Jan 2026, 08:57 UTC≈69,800 views1,497 reactions54 Starsread 9 September 2026
Video

Свидетельство офицера полиции о связи СВДС с вакцинацией

👍689292😢187🔥103🙏78😱54💔40💯27

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @amantonio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“amantonio” (@amantonio), 77,315 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/amantonio.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.