Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 44 days, net -1,281. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,667–26,339 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 15:19
24,860
-187
16 Sept 2026, 09:19
25,047
-97
14 Sept 2026, 16:56
25,144
-20
13 Sept 2026, 06:01
25,164
-21
11 Sept 2026, 09:01
25,185
-6
8 Sept 2026, 18:20
25,191
-30
3 Sept 2026, 10:25
25,221
+10
2 Sept 2026, 06:57
25,211
-36
1 Sept 2026, 06:17
25,247
-26
31 Aug 2026, 03:03
25,273
-32
30 Aug 2026, 05:54
25,305
-13
29 Aug 2026, 06:23
25,318
-8
28 Aug 2026, 04:48
25,326
-7
27 Aug 2026, 02:53
25,333
-253
25 Aug 2026, 23:18
25,586
-18
24 Aug 2026, 22:08
25,604
-19
23 Aug 2026, 10:08
25,623
-15
22 Aug 2026, 00:45
25,638
-34
20 Aug 2026, 15:53
25,672
-13
19 Aug 2026, 12:23
25,685
first reading
Engagement
44 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.11%
avg views ÷ 24,860 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,520
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.72%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 44 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
44 (27 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
16,710
Reactions total
288
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 10:34 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 43s
Average length
52s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,198 reactions across 41 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5348081912495748602
410
34.2%
❤
301
25.1%
🤩
153
12.8%
👍
126
10.5%
👏
103
8.60%
custom 5348562317472706421
66
5.51%
custom 5449829520234292042
39
3.26%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,251 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вдохновленные беговыми моделями, PUMA Fade Nitro LS созданы для повседневной жизни. Амортизация обеспечивает лёгкость и упругую отдачу, а технология PWRFRAME поддерживает стопу и добавляет стабильности каждому шагу.
Выбирай свою расцветку на сайте и в сети магазинов AMAZING RED.
Итоги беговой активации за август подведены! Победители получат по паре PUMA Deviate NITRO 4 🏆
Турнирная таблица на сентябрь обновлена, продолжаем фиксировать новые рекорды в магазине AMAZING RED в ТЦ «Авиапарк»🏃♂️
Напоминаем, что посмотреть результаты можно онлайн — собрали правила, итоги месяца и другую полезную информацию в одном месте.
Энергия 2000-х в PUMA Homura OG+.
Силуэт впервые появился на пике эры Y2K и стал частью экспериментального этапа в дизайне PUMA, которой прослеживается в архивной линейке Complete.
Японский иероглиф, он же символ пламени, на язычке и стельке отсылает к названию модели и характеру той эпохи.
Ищи свою расцветку на сайте и в магазинах сети AMAZING RED.
20 000 бонусов скоро сгорят 🔥
Успей потратить их на покупки в AMAZING RED до 31.08 включительно.
Бонусы действуют на товары из новой коллекции и не суммируются с другими акциями.
Для учебы и после, а также на спорт — собрали все, что пригодится в новом сезоне.
Уже на сайте и в магазинах сети AMAZING RED.
Напоминаем, что до 31.08 включительно действуют 20 000 бонусов, которыми можно оплатить до 20% суммы при покупке вещей из новой коллекции.
AMAZING RED x 52 в Москве 🦅
29 августа AMAZING RED снова станет частью фестиваля 52 Day.
Ищи наш корнер, где будет:
- поп-ап с продажами лимитированной коллаборации AMAZING RED x 52: джерси, сумки и носки;
- конкурс на жим и подтягивания: всем участникам начисляем бонусные баллы, а за лучший результат подарим джерси от AMAZING RED.
Увидимся в субботу в клубе "Атмосфера". Вход по билетам.
Собрали разные модели сумок PUMA для него и для неё: компактные и вместительные, из текстиля и кожи, на каждый день и для тренировок.
Выбирай ту, которая подходит именно тебе, на сайте и в магазинах сети AMAZING RED.
Икона PUMA с 1968 года — PUMA Suede в новом прочтении.
Мягкий замшевый верх, лаконичные детали и гибкая подошва Vibram с рельефным протектором для уверенного сцепления и долговечности.
Классический силуэт, готовый к современному ритму города. Уже на сайте и в магазинах сети AMAZING RED.
Расслабленные силуэты, природные оттенки — Сыч в тотал-образе премиальной линейки PUMA.
В основе — свитшот T7 Relaxed Polo Crew Neck, футболка SELECT Essentials Tee и кроссовки Suede Vibram.
Другие знаковые модели бренда ищи в магазинах и на сайте AMAZING RED.
Напоминаем, что только до 31 августа для всех клиентов, зарегистрированных в программе лояльности, мы начислили 20 000 бонусов.
4-е место на The International 2026 🇨🇳
Спасибо BETBOOM TEAM за борьбу и всем, кто был рядом с командой на этом пути.
❤24👏11custom 534808191249574860210👍3🤩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @amazingredstore. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 148%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Классика в замше или новое прочтение в коже — какой вариант PUMA Suede тебе ближе?
замша59%
кожа43%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 28 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@amazingredstore named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@basektpoooint named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AMAZING RED” (@amazingredstore), 24,860 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/amazingredstore.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.