Channel
@amiralek_digest
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,187subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003117606499 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @amiralek_digest |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/amiralek_digest |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 02:38 | 1,187 | -2 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 10:40 | 1,189 | -4 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 04:35 | 1,193 | -2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 15:34 | 1,195 | +10 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:04 | 1,185 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:08 | 1,188 | -7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:25 | 1,195 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 02:38 | 1,197 | -4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:28 | 1,201 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:35 | 1,203 | +5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:38 | 1,198 | +9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 1,189 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:33 | 1,189 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
61 reactions across 11 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 61 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 61 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 May 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Amiralek’s Curated Digest pinned «The limit is not Intelligence Most ppl r looking at super-intelligence as a binary, either we'll get there or not But, maybe the correct mental model is that it won't hit every domain simultaneously/equally. the best framework to predict the rate of progress…»
The limit is not Intelligence Most ppl r looking at super-intelligence as a binary, either we'll get there or not But, maybe the correct mental model is that it won't hit every domain simultaneously/equally. the best framework to predict the rate of progress I've ever seen is this tweet by Max not all intelligence is equally verifiable tier 1: programmatically verifiable coding, math, games, cybersec, chip desig…
👍4
Amiralek’s Curated Digest pinned a file
The New Trillion-dollar Question few weeks ago I posted Zitron's thesis: the AI bubble bursts wen the market starts rewarding the first hyperscaler that cuts capex July might be the start of that test: 1) Meta said it'll sell its excess AI compute to others (one of the biggest compute buyers on earth now has spare capacity) 2) google burned more cash than it made last quarter (first time since it IPO'd in 2004). I…
👍5
Amiralek’s Curated Digest pinned «look, I am somewhat of a mathematician myself now several posts blew up last week: Levant dropped a counterexample that nulls the Jacobian conjecture (open since 1939) with Claude Fable 5 while the world cup final was on then Shouqiao ran GPT-5.6 Sol…»
look, I am somewhat of a mathematician myself now several posts blew up last week: Levant dropped a counterexample that nulls the Jacobian conjecture (open since 1939) with Claude Fable 5 while the world cup final was on then Shouqiao ran GPT-5.6 Sol for a few days and took down 6 open Erdős problems published the prompts + proofs + Lean formalizations the workflow doesn’t even need deep math knowledge & couple o…
👍6
Amiralek’s Curated Digest pinned «LLMs r a shitty biz been mostly focused on AI agents/dev stuff lately, but for a change let's talk about AI economics last week there were 2 viral clips on CNBC: one was Ed Zitron the other was Alex Karp Zitron is probably the biggest AI bear on Wall…»
LLMs r a shitty biz been mostly focused on AI agents/dev stuff lately, but for a change let's talk about AI economics last week there were 2 viral clips on CNBC: one was Ed Zitron the other was Alex Karp Zitron is probably the biggest AI bear on Wall Street rn, & his thesis actually makes sense his core point is that LLMs r very useful, but offer a shitty biz model that OpenAI / Anthropic r not normal software c…
👍5
Amiralek’s Curated Digest pinned «Unknown Unknowns Thariq put together this article that is pointing to a very delicate architectural/PM issue https://x.com/trq212/article/2073100352921215386 Right now, many of these AI models r more savvy than us at lots of domains (makes sense cause their…»
Unknown Unknowns Thariq put together this article that is pointing to a very delicate architectural/PM issue https://x.com/trq212/article/2073100352921215386 Right now, many of these AI models r more savvy than us at lots of domains (makes sense cause their understanding is at least at the average knowledge lvl of the internet) Wen v prompt them, it's like v r trying to manage a junior employee who is smarter than…
👍4
Amiralek’s Curated Digest pinned «The Agentic Diet I recently discovered Trendshift: https://trendshift.io/weekly/2026/25 & I think it’s a pretty useful way to c what devs care about, week over week not because GitHub stars r perfect they’re not but because trending repos r often early building…»
The Agentic Diet I recently discovered Trendshift: https://trendshift.io/weekly/2026/25 & I think it’s a pretty useful way to c what devs care about, week over week not because GitHub stars r perfect they’re not but because trending repos r often early building blocks of where software is heading & rn, the signal is very clear: agentic coding is moving from more to less this week's standing is: #1 Ponytail #2 H…
👍5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @amiralek_digest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Amiralek’s Curated Digest” (@amiralek_digest), 1,187 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/amiralek_digest.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.