Elon Musk on ego to ability ratio, internalizing responsibility, and keeping the feedback loop to reality intact. https://x.com/jaynitx/status/2084667963433697440?s=20

Channel
Somo Crypto & Ai Reads
@somoreads
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,282subscribers
-34 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002233495123 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @somoreads |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/somoreads |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 01:19 | 2,282 | -5 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 23:00 | 2,287 | -2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 22:40 | 2,289 | -4 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 00:01 | 2,293 | -3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:33 | 2,296 | -6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:08 | 2,302 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:56 | 2,303 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:32 | 2,305 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 2,308 | -5 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:08 | 2,313 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:17 | 2,312 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:25 | 2,314 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:20 | 2,315 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:33 | 2,316 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
39 reactions across 14 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 26 | 66.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 13 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Career compounding: find the most competent room that will let you in, become painfully useful there, then let trust and proximity create the next room. https://x.com/spakhm/status/2085049411332087891?s=46
❤1
Somo Crypto & Ai Reads pinned a photo
Aggressive Over Asking Most people still ask AI for substitution: write this, summarize that, make this faster. The edge is moving up the ladder: delegation, recursion, orchestration. What you ask for is finally catching up to what it can do. https://x.com/somonaut/status/2084758908015661410?s=20
❤🔥6
Multiverse Markets Prediction markets price whether a world happens. Multiverse markets let traders trade inside that world before it happens. A normal asset price is often a blend of futures that cannot all come true. A biotech stock before an FDA decision, ETH before a major policy shock, a token before a vote. The screen shows one price, but the trade is really hiding multiple worlds. • Prediction markets give …
❤1❤🔥1
The limit is not Intelligence Most ppl r looking at super-intelligence as a binary, either we'll get there or not But, maybe the correct mental model is that it won't hit every domain simultaneously/equally. the best framework to predict the rate of progress I've ever seen is this tweet by Max not all intelligence is equally verifiable tier 1: programmatically verifiable coding, math, games, cybersec, chip desig…
❤4
I've been building a few agent skills. Some of them might be useful if you use Claude, Cursor, Codex, or any skill-compatible agent. The idea is simple: instead of writing the same long prompt every time, you install a skill once and the agent knows how to handle that type of work properly. Here's what I've made: 1. no-slop For writing that doesn't smell like AI. It catches generic AI texture, fake polish, weak rh…
❤5
Skillmaxxing is probably the only way to get out of the system from now on.
❤3
Senate has 5 days to pass the Crypto Clarity Act before leaving for summer recess. Source
❤2
Everything you do has to be rockstar shit'
❤🔥4
Michael Saylor's Strategy authorizes plans to sell up to $5 billion in Bitcoin Source
https://x.com/cburniske/status/2083292223186276738?s=20
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @somoreads. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Somo Crypto & Ai Reads” (@somoreads), 2,282 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/somoreads.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.