Channel
@anamusslim
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
22,751subscribers
-205 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002316479280 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @anamusslim |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/anamusslim |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 05:16 | 22,751 | -18 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 20:39 | 22,769 | +12 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 23:39 | 22,757 | +167 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:39 | 22,590 | +102 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 16:21 | 22,488 | +73 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 04:37 | 22,415 | -48 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 19:16 | 22,463 | -31 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 15:00 | 22,494 | -15 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:33 | 22,509 | -15 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:54 | 22,524 | -17 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:33 | 22,541 | -29 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:54 | 22,570 | -9 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:34 | 22,579 | -12 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:24 | 22,591 | -19 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 12:33 | 22,610 | -11 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:06 | 22,621 | -23 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 15:28 | 22,644 | -13 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:28 | 22,657 | -40 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:07 | 22,697 | -26 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:25 | 22,723 | first reading |
132 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 132 (2 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 86,091 |
| Reactions total | 1,800 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 12:11 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5,475 reactions across 132 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4,708 | 86.0% | |
| 🕊 | 127 | 2.32% | |
| 🥰 | 115 | 2.10% | |
| 💯 | 95 | 1.74% | |
| 🍓 | 92 | 1.68% | |
| 😢 | 79 | 1.44% | |
| 👌 | 53 | 0.968% | |
| 💘 | 50 | 0.913% | |
| 👍 | 48 | 0.877% | |
| 💔 | 41 | 0.749% | |
| ❤🔥 | 27 | 0.493% | |
| 😍 | 12 | 0.219% | |
| 🆒 | 9 | 0.164% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 0.091% | |
| 😘 | 4 | 0.073% | |
| 🤝 | 4 | 0.073% | |
| ✍ | 3 | 0.055% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 0.037% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.018% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 132 of the 132 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,475 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 132 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
يا أبا هُريرة ؛أتبكي على الدُّنيا لا والله ، دُنياكم هذهِ لا تُبكيني إنَّما أبكي مِنْ ثِقَلِ الحِملِ،وسوء الرفيق ، وَمِن قلَّةِ الزَّاد ، وُبعدِ الطَّريق ؛ أبكي خوفًا مِن أسقُط يوم القيامة مِن على الصراط ولا أدخُل الجنَّة..ودِدتُ أنِّي لَم أُخلق ". 📚- سير أعلام النبلاء (٥٢٥/٢).
❤17💯1🥰1😢1
Signed Enas AMR
استبدل «أنا آسف» بـ «شكرًا». بدل أن تقول : آسف على التأخير قل: «شكرًا لأنك انتظرتني». وبدل: «آسف على الإزعاج»... قل: «شكرًا لاهتمامك». هذا التحول البسيط لا يغير كلماتك فقط ... بل يغيّر شعور من أمامك، لأنك تستبدل الاعتذار المتكرر بالامتنان.
❤51💯6👍2🥰1
قال بعض السلف : كنَّا إِذا جِئنا للصَّلاة خَلعنا الدُّنيا مع نعالنا !"
❤34💘4😢2
أربعة أشياء لا تتركها في حياتك: 1- لا تترك الشكر فتُحرَم الزيادة ﴿لَئِنْ شَكَرْتُمْ لَأَزِيدَنَّكُمْ﴾ 2- ولا تترك ذكر الله فتُحرَم ذكر الله لك ﴿فَاذْكُرُونِي أَذْكُرْكُمْ﴾ 3- ولا تترك الدعاء فتُحرَم الاستجابة ﴿ادْعُونِي أَسْتَجِبْ لَكُمْ﴾ 4- ولا تترك الاستغفار فتُحرَم النجاة ﴿وَمَا كَانَ اللَّهُ مُعَذِّبَهُمْ وَهُمْ يَسْتَغْفِرُونَ﴾ ..
❤35💯2👌1🕊1😢1
ردد معي : اللهم سامحني إن غفلت ،اللهم سامحني إن قصرت اللهم سامحني إن نسيت ،اللهم لا تأخذني وأنا غافل اللهم لا تأخذني وأنا مقصر ،اللهم لا تأخذني وأنا ضعيف اللهم خذ بيدي إذا تعبت ،اللهم اجبر قلبي إذا انكسر اللهم قربني إليك إذا ابتعدت ،اللهم لا تحرمني لذة القرب منك اللهم لا تذقني مرارة البعد عنك اللهم اجعلني لك كما تحب وترضى اللهم طهّر قلبي واغفر ذنبي وثبتني على طاعتك يارب ذكر غيرك ولك الاجر ان شاء الله..
❤38🥰2👏1💯1
تطوير الذات قد يدمّر حياتك إذا فهمته بشكل خاطئ. ليس المطلوب أن تصبح نسخة أفضل منك كل يوم، ولا أن تستيقظ الخامسة صباحًا، ولا أن تقرأ كتابًا كل أسبوع، ولا أن تكون منتجًا طوال الوقت. أحيانًا يكون أكبر تطور لك أن تتوقف عن إجبار نفسك على حياة لا تشبهك. أن تقول «لا». أن ترتاح دون شعور بالذنب. أن تترك علاقة تستنزفك. أن تقبل أنك لست مضطرًا لإثبات قيمتك للجميع. تطوير الذات ليس أن تصبح شخصًا آخر. بل أن تتوقف عن خيانة نفسك... ح…
❤35👌2👍1💯1😍1
ستنتهي العلاقة الزوجية حين يبدأ كل طرف بالتركيز على «أنا» بدل «نحن». فالزواج ليس ساحة لإثبات من المخطئ ومن المصيب، ولا مساحة لحساب من قدّم أكثر ومن تنازل أكثر. الزواج الحقيقي أن يسأل كل طرف: ماذا نستطيع أن نفعل لنحمي علاقتنا؟ حين تصبح العلاقة مسابقة في تسجيل الأهداف، يبدأ البعد حتى لو بقي الطرفان تحت سقف واحد. فالزواج لا ينجح لأن شخصين يحبان بعضهما فقط، بل لأنهما يعرفان كيف يحافظان على «نحن».
❤27👍1💯1🕊1🆒1
حين يخدعك أحدهم، لا تُرهق نفسك في محاولة إثبات أنك كنت على حق. تقبّل ما حدث، سامح إن استطعت، ثم انسحب بهدوء. لكن بعد ذلك، لا تُعد فتح الأبواب نفسها لمن أثبت لك أنه لا يحترم حدودك. غيّر الأقفال... ليس للانتقام، بل لأن بعض الدروس لا تحتاج إلى فرصة ثانية.
❤36💯1😢1
«وَمَا تَوْفِيقِي إِلَّا بِاللَّهِ» قد تبذل كل ما تستطيع، وتخطط جيدًا، وتملك الخبرة والقدرة، ثم لا تسير الأمور كما أردت. وقد يحدث العكس؛ تذهب بإمكانات بسيطة، فيفتح الله لك أبوابًا لم تكن في حسابك. ربما لهذا نحتاج أن نفهم الفرق بين السعي والتوفيق. السعي منك، لكن أن تصل في الوقت المناسب، وأن تجد الشخص المناسب، وأن يُفتح لك الباب المناسب، فهذه أشياء لا تملكها. فكم من إنسان ظن أن نجاحه كان بسبب ذكائه وحده، حتى جاء موقف و…
❤25🥰4💔2😢1
سُبحانَكَ ربّي، تأتي رحمتُكَ في وقتٍ لا نُدركُه، فتسكنُ بها أرواحُنا، ويطمئنُ بها القلب♥️.
❤35🍓1👍1💯1🥰1
حكمة احفظها جيدًا تعلمك معنى الإكتفاء والقناعة : " إذا امتلكت شيئا جميلا، لا تبحث عن الأجمل فتخسر الإثنين معا "
❤40💯4❤🔥1🍓1🕊1🥰1😍1
قصة "الفلاح والحصان" الشهيرة (أو قصة الفلاح الصيني الحكيم) المعروضة في الصورة تحمل معاني عميقة حول الرضا والتسليم بحكمة القدر وعدم التسرع في الحكم على الأمور ببواطنها الظاهرة. ملخص أحداث القصة: • فقدان الحصان: ضاع حصان الفلاح الوحيد الذي يعينه على حرث أرضه، فجاء الجيران يواسونه على هذه "المصيبة"، فكان رده الهادئ: "من يدري إن كانت مصيبة؟" • عودة الحصان ومعه الخيول: عاد الحصان ومعه مجموعة من الخيول البرية، فجاء الجيران…
❤22💯1🕊1🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 132 posts we hold for @anamusslim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“طَليـقٌ” (@anamusslim), 22,751 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anamusslim.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.